A number of lawsuits were filed as class actions against General Motors (GM) in state and federal courts across the United States involving "Dex-Cool" extended-life engine coolant. Among other things, the lawsuits alleged that Dex-Cool in certain vehicles caused problems with the vehicles' engines or cooling systems, and that certain engine components, such as the nylon/silicone lower intake manifold gaskets equipped in certain vehicles, were defective.
GM denied any wrongdoing but has agreed to a class action settlement of the lawsuits. The company argued that Dex-Cool protected engines for a longer period than traditional coolants, caused less wear on certain engine parts than traditional coolants, and provided environmental benefits. GM further argued that alleged problems with the vehicles' engines or cooling systems were caused by owners not following the maintenance instructions for their vehicles or other factors.
Gibbs explains that this settlement reflects five years of hard work on the part of the court and the lawyers. And of course, the outcome is that the money goes back into the pockets of countless people that had to get their cars fixed. GM will reimburse class members up to a specified amount for certain repair costs they paid during the first seven years or 150,000 miles of vehicle ownership or lease, whichever is earlier.
"Our goal was to provide some type of reimbursement so we have largely achieved our goal," says Gibbs. "The settlement reimburses people for repairs that they had to make on their vehicles. Most will recover about $400; others from $400-$800; while others will receive anywhere from $50-$100, depending upon how old their vehicle was at the time of repair."
Regarding the impact this settlement has on future defective products, Gibbs wonders if tort reform has eroded consumer rights to such a large degree that it will be unusual to see meaningful recoveries in consumer protection cases like the one we achieved in the Dex-Cool litigation.
"Although the claims period hasn't opened yet, people can check out our website".
We have posted information about the settlements and ultimately our site will link to a settlement website where people can file claims. At this point the California court has given preliminary approval to the settlement, a court in Missouri will consider preliminary approval on Friday and the courts will hear final approval in late August and early September.
READER COMMENTS
RIchard Busche
on
Barbara Covello
on
I am the sole owner of a 2003 Pontiac Grand Am, GM serviced and repairs were $2500 for a head gasket/coolant flush and they never test drove it to check for "air bubbles" before giving it back to me.
One year later the bolt for rocker arm is stripped! Only could have happened during repair work. Mechanic refuses to compensate. Says "junk it" or replace entire cylinder head. For Shame GM. Time for a second class action suit!
Sheri Wolf Branch
on
Lee Williams
on
PS: Please help
john
on
Steve
on
Jack Higdon
on
Jessica L Williams
on
Jessica L Williams
on
antonio viola
on
wilma quenzer
on
James Harris
on
Thanking You
James Harris