Asbestos News Roundup: 6.13.13 – Family Asbestos Exposure

June 13th, 2013. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map.

Asbestos Disease A Family Affair

The recent case of an 82-year old woman recently diagnosed with asbestos mesothelioma has highlighted how asbestos dust represented a danger not just to those who worked in heavy industry, but also to their wives and children.

Mrs. Grigg was exposed to asbestos in the course of shaking out and washing her husband’s work clothing. Mrs. Grigg’s then husband was an insulator for a company that used Owens-Illinois, Inc. Kaylo brand insulation products from 1950-1958.

Mrs. Griggs’ case, sadly, is not an isolated incident. There are many cases of family members developing asbestos disease as a result of secondary asbestos exposure, for example, by wives beating their husband’s dusty overalls as they hung on a washing line, or shaking them off in a doorway before putting them in a washing machine. Their husbands worked in industries such as mining, ship-building, construction, plumbing and electrical.

Children and even grandchildren have also been put at risk, running up to a returning parent to give them a hug as they return from work, or sitting on their knee as they wear their dusty work clothes. The risk of loved ones being accidentally exposed is unfortunate and just adds to the tragic legacy of asbestos. But as this latest case shows, it is something that family members need to be made aware of.

Asbestos Lawsuits

Pittsburgh, PA: 72-year old Michael A. Hrycko, and is wife Joyce Hrycko have filed an asbestos civil suit against various companies engaged in the manufacture and distribution of products containing the fiber.

In their lawsuit, the Hrycko’s claim that Michael Hrycko was advised by doctors at Grandview Hospital in February 2012 that he has malignant mesothelioma, a type of cancer usually associated with asbestos exposure.

Hrycko worked as a machinist at various companies between 1960 and 2007. According to the lawsuit, it was during this period that Mr. Hrycko was exposed to asbestos-containing materials and asbestos dust and fibers which led to his eventual mesothelioma diagnosis.

The lawsuit states the asbestos mesothelioma is causing the plaintiff to experience “physical symptoms, impairment and disability.”

The defendants named in the asbestos lawsuit are: CBS Corp., Industrial Holdings Corp., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Plastics Engineering Co., Saint-Gobain Abrasives Inc., and Union Carbide Corp. (pennsylvaniarecord.com)

Asbestos Settlements

Oakland, CA: On June 5, 2013, an Oakland jury completed its award to plaintiffs Rose-Marie and Martin Grigg of a total of $27,342,500 in damages stemming from Mrs. Grigg’s asbestos-caused mesothelioma (Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG12629580). Mrs. Grigg, now 82, was exposed to asbestos in the course of shaking out and washing her husband’s work clothing. Mrs. Grigg’s then husband was an insulator for a company that used Owens-Illinois, Inc. Kaylo brand insulation products from 1950-1958.

Evidence introduced during trial showed that Owens-Illinois, Inc. knew that asbestos exposure could cause death as early as the 1930s and that test results on Kaylo showed that exposure to the asbestos in the product could cause fatal disease.

According to court documents, Owens-Illinois nonetheless advertised Kaylo as “non-toxic” and did not state that the product contained asbestos. Kaylo was packaged in boxes without warning about the health hazards associated with asbestos exposure.

The jury found that Owens-Illinois, Inc. manufactured a defective product, failed to adequately warn Mrs. Grigg, was negligent, and intentionally failed to disclose information about Kaylo-related health hazards to Mrs. Grigg. The jury also found that Owens-Illinois, Inc. acted with malice, oppression or fraud toward Mrs. Grigg.

The jury awarded Mrs. Grigg $12,000,000 in damages for her pain and suffering, Mr. Grigg $4,000,000 in damages for his loss of consortium, and $342,500 in economic damages. The jury also levied an $11,000,000 punitive damages verdict against Owens-Illinois, Inc. (prweb.com)

Asbestos Law

Falls City, NB: Vision 20-20, a Nebraska company, has been fined $25,000 for illegally disposing of asbestos. in an effort to save money. The company pled guilty to the illegal asbestos dumping, claiming it was an effort to save money.

According to a report by the Associated Press, In October 2010 Vision 20-20 hired an asbestos removal firm to work on a building scheduled for demolition. The asbestos abatement company was paid $24,000 for services to the roof, but additional work remained on floor tiles and flooring underneath the tiles. The company returned to the demolition site several months later to continue the work only to find the building had been demolished.

State officials determined Vision 20-20 illegally removed the asbestos and demolished the building in order to save $14,000.(SFGate.com)

 

Tags: Asbestos, asbestos lawsuit, Asbestos Mesothelioma

This was posted on Thursday, June 13th, 2013 at 3:17 pm and is filed under Asbestos Mesothelioma . Feel free to respond, or trackback. Read our comments policy.