Insomuch as we are conditioned, in this day and age, to being picky about what we put IN our bodies, we may be falling down in the area of what we put ON our bodies.
Specifically, makeup.
Some women use makeup sparingly. Others don’t use it at all. Then there’s the gal who paints it on so thick, marauding mosquitoes would ultimately fail to find skin to penetrate.
Beauty has as many definitions, as there are individuals. However, beyond the vanity—or lack thereof—that serves as the foundation for makeup use, are the questions about what’s in the stuff.
A Canadian advocacy group known as Environmental Defense (ED) wondered just that. ED tested 49 common items used as makeup in search for the presence and levels of eight heavy metals, including lead and arsenic.
The result? All 49 products tested contained an average of four of the eight metals they were looking for. That’s the average: some had more, others less. But all products were found to contain at least two.
It’s not that manufacturers are deliberately putting heavy metals into makeup. What appears to be happening, however, is that impurities naturally occurring in the basic ingredients used in producing various forms of makeup are finding their way into the finished product.
The tested products were found, overall, to contain trace amounts of heavy metals that fell well below the impurity limits proposed by Health Canada.
But not all…
One of the lip glosses tested contained 110 parts-per-million (ppm) of lead, well above the 10 ppm limit proposed by Health Canada. The same lip gloss also was found to contain 70 ppm of arsenic, compared with a proposed limit of 3 ppm deemed safe for use.
Doctors and health care advocates claim that such high levels of heavy metals could be vastly reduced if manufacturers were motivated.
So, what would motivate them? Defective product lawsuits? What’s the long-term impact of makeup use? And what about those who habitually apply their foundation with a trowel? What is such exposure doing to them?
Does anyone look at the labels, to see what’s in this stuff? Are the labels even up-to-date?
Where is your makeup made? China? The latter republic has a reputation for putting lead into your kid’s toys. Is it in your makeup, too?
Those who never give their makeup a passing thought, need to hear the story of actor Buddy Ebsen, who was the original Tin Man in The Wizard of Oz (shown above in picture).
Ebsen, a young song-and-dance man at the time, assumed the role of the Tin Man after switching places with Ray Bolger—who had originally been cast as the Tin Man but was moved to the role of the Scarecrow instead.
Ebsen recorded the soundtrack and rehearsed all the scenes before filming started in full costume. Strangely, the young and energetic Ebsen began experiencing cramps and shortness of breath, and he was hospitalized.
It was determined that the cause of his illness was the aluminum dust used in his silver make-up. Inhaling the dust into his lungs caused the problem, and he was never able to go back to the role. His replacement, Jack Haley, went on to fame as the beloved Tin Man in the iconic movie—but only after producers switched to a paste makeup so the actor wouldn’t inhale the aluminum dust, as Ebsen had done.
Ebsen would later say that he suffered from lung issues the rest of his life, following his allergic reaction to inhaling aluminum dust when he was in his twenties.
So…what’s in your makeup? Is it safe? Or is it harming you over the long-term? What are the manufacturers doing about it? What’s their responsibility?
Food for thought, the next time you’re putting on your face…
Do you mind me venting?
I have just been put on a statin because my cholesterol is too high. Apparently my doctor says, at 54, I am at a high risk for heart attack and stroke.
Nice. This, in spite of the fact I have no history of heart disease in my family, I have never smoked, I have exercised semi-regularly and have always watched my weight.
Okay, maybe I haven’t been watching what I eat. I like my steaks and prime rib like everybody else. Butter on popcorn, if you please. And perhaps, on occasion, a beer or two, too many.
And okay, while never an exercise demon I was always a fairly active guy. Rode my bike to work. In the late 90’s I took up walking for health, and to lose a few pounds. Then in 2002 I took up running. I ran a half-marathon in under two hours. And I trained for a full marathon (although I never completed the actual race). I got myself down to my high school weight of 129.
But for the past five years I haven’t done a lot, due to work commitments. Is that the reason for my current troubles? Can five years of inactivity cancel out 40 years of fairly active living?
I guess…
So now I’m on low-dose Aspirin once a day, to thin the blood out. And now, as of last night, I’m on a statin to reduce my bad cholesterol.
Overall, statins are considered good things. And not all statins are created equal. Thankfully, I’m not on Zocor, or Vytorin. I’m on another one. But at 10mg, I’m on the highest dose Read the rest of this entry »
Wells Fargo—the fourth largest bank in the country in terms of assets—was assessed the largest fine ever issued by the US Federal Reserve (The Fed) for allegedly pushing borrowers into more expensive mortgages, and in so doing helping to foster the sub-prime mortgage mess.
These were borrowers with good credit and cash flow, and could have easily qualified for conventional mortgages at prime, according to a report yesterday in CNN Money.
Instead, they were allegedly nudged into mortgage products that would have proved more expensive in the end. Wells Fargo Financial, a subsidiary that closed last year, was also accused of pushing through loan applications that would otherwise not have qualified due to income restrictions. It is alleged that the income information was ‘doctored.’
We say ‘alleged,’ because even though Wells Fargo agreed to pay the largest fine ever handed out by The Fed—$85 million—the banking juggernaut was not required to admit to any wrongdoing.
In fact, Wells Fargo explained in a statement that the alleged wrongdoing occurred at the hands of a few ne’er do well former employees, and that such conduct is not within the mandate or policy of Wells Fargo.
That’s like parents claiming they are not responsible for the actions of their children.
Come on…
And what does that say about ethics in the banking industry?
I was doing a story on personal finance some years ago and a banking executive was very frank in her assessment of the lengths some banks will go to get loans on the books—in other words, generate business for the bank.
To paraphrase:
“If you come in looking to borrow, say, $15,000 to buy a new truck and the loans officer realizes that you have the cash flow that would accommodate $25,000—you’re going to be pushed to borrow that $25,000. It will be a polite push. But it will be a firm push, and a push just the same. All you want is fifteen grand.
“But the bank seems to know what’s better for you, than you do.”
That interview took place around 1991 or so—20 years ago.
So look what that policy got us into (and I’m not picking on Wells Fargo here, this applies to everyone…)
It was the banks that helped fuel the sub-prime mortgage meltdown by pushing people into more expensive mortgages beyond their comfort zones (or their financial contingencies). It was the banks or their agents that allegedly doctored income statements. The stories of individuals who qualified for a mortgage without the capacity to confirm their income at all are legend, and the stuff of modern financial folklore.
The bank is supposed to say, ‘whoa…wait a minute…you may not be in a position to afford that truck, or that big house. C’mon now, take a good hard look at your finances. You have to dial your expectations back a notch.’
But no. The opposite proved true. Or, at least in one case, the opposite is alleged to have proven true. Wells Fargo will pay $85 million in fines, plus compensate up to 10,000 borrowers to the tune of between $1,000 and $20,000 apiece.
They can afford it. Earlier this week Wells Fargo reported $3.9 billion in net income for Q2 from revenues totaling in excess of $20 billion.
An $85 million fine? Millions more to compensate victims?
That’s nuthin’…
What’s something, is that they didn’t have to admit they (allegedly) screwed up…
The Obama Administration has tried to beef up the FDA (US Food and Drug Administration). Give it more authority, and more autonomy.
But it’s too little, too late. And the law that the President signed in January, giving the FDA the power to mandate food recalls (it didn’t in the past???) has yet to be implemented and can’t be enforced until they figure out how.
Sorry, but I always thought the FDA was the prescription drug police, the overseer of our food chain and the watchdog over medical devices. Cross that watchdog and look out. Pushing the envelope and dissing the regulator might get you a warning if you’re lucky. Chances are, if you’re a pharmaceutical company, or a food supplier and you screw up—you WILL find yourself in the FDA slammer.
In our dreams…
It comes as no surprise that a recent government review of serious food recalls reveals that the FDA is dropping the ball on its responsibility for protecting the nation’s food supply.
And in so doing, protecting us.
According to a CNN report last week, the Department of Health and Human Safety Services (HHS) reviewed 17 Read the rest of this entry »
Say your doctor was on call all night the night before your scheduled 6 a.m. surgery. Would you still want to go under the knife?
It has long been debated that the effects of sleep deprivation can be just as harmful—and just as much an impairment—as that delivered from alcohol, or drugs. Bottom line: when we’re tired, we screw up.
You run off the road while driving, your reflexes are slower. Worse, when you try to counter the fog in your brain and the yawn on your face with copious amounts of caffeine or other stimulants, you have reflexes unsupported by studied thought—a pure reactive state, with little depth or substance from a sleep-deprived brain straining to carry on with the aid of chemicals in the place of rest.
So why is there not more dialog on this with regard to the medical profession and medical errors?
Recently, the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) published an editorial on the sleepy doctor syndrome. Not only did the CMAJ target the problem at the doctor and hospital level, it also called upon legislators to develop national standards in the regulated health care industry to protect patients from sleepy docs.
There is valid reason for this concern.
Beyond the temptation for some doctors to wear sleep deprivation as a badge of honor—or hospitals having to make do with fewer staff amidst the realities of a health care system under siege and shrinking health care dollars—are studies that paint an alarming picture of both where we are, and where we’re headed.
According to a story in the Montreal Gazette (5/25/11), studies have shown a near doubling in the rate of complications when surgeons operate with fewer than six hours of sleep—usually following a night on call.
Those complications have been found to include injuries to organs (a slip of the scalpel), and massive hemorrhaging. Such events can put a patient’s life in immediate danger, or affect their health over the long term.
The doctor, in contrast, goes home to a pillow and beyond feeling regret for the error, is not required to live with the consequences of that error for a lifetime. Unless, of course, a medical malpractice lawsuit is filed.
Mistakes happen, and to err is human nature. But in publishing its editorial, the CMAJ suggested that an already serious problem is about to get worse given the increasing complexities of the health care field. “Unprecedented” demands are placed on a doctor’s physical and cognitive health, as a result.
“Those of us who remain overconfident that we can continue to perform our duties properly with inadequate sleep should imagine the reaction if we were made to seek informed consent from each of our patients to accept treatment under these conditions,” state the authors, adding that working while sleep deprived is neither “normal nor acceptable.”
The authors also point out that—in Canada at least—limits on how long a resident, intern or medical student can go without sleep are not extended to practicing doctors, who often work without supervision and are often older and thus even more susceptible to the effects of lack of sleep.
Such situations are ripe for malpractice lawsuits—and doctors, together with the hospitals that employ them, need to be cognizant of that fact. Errors are unavoidable—but they can me managed and mitigated.
There are already efforts underway in other areas of the health care system. Increasing the use of checks and balances—akin to the checklist in the airline cockpit—helps ensure that the surgeon is operating on the correct patient and is performing the correct procedure in, or on the requisite are of the patient’s body.
Similar-looking labels on drug containers are being changed to avoid confusion in the pharmacy. Lawsuits, together with media scrutiny and public outrage, have helped to motivate the powers that be into action.
What of sleepy docs? Will a spate of lawsuits prompt the health care industry to action beyond mere debate? Lawsuits might be business for the lawyers, and monetary settlements necessary for the affected plaintiffs. But most would prefer to have been spared amputation of the wrong leg, or a scalpel nick that brought on a lifetime of pain or complication, all because the doctor yawned at the wrong time, or wasn’t in total control of his movements just because he was so bloody tired.
Maybe you can collect garbage on a few hours sleep. But I, for one, don’t want anyone going near me with a knife if they might be tired and sleep deprived.
Don’t be a hero. Sign out, go to bed, and let someone else do it. And somebody, somewhere needs to come up with a system that guarantees that.