They fall all over themselves to make sure you have a good time. But they might not be doing the one thing that would pretty near guarantee you one:
Cleaning the public restrooms. And the problem with a gastrointestinal outbreak on a cruise ship is that you’re often thousands of miles in the middle of nowhere.
Make no mistake—compared to other bathrooms of the world, cruise ship bathrooms appear to be sparkling. I’ve been in them. So have you. And compared to the bathroom at the airport, or at the restaurant where you had dinner before your flight to meet the ship, cruise ship rest rooms appear to be so clean you could eat off the floor.
Well, almost. But not quite.
The problem is the pesky norovirus, which is a tough old bird that survives on just about anything for weeks at room temperature. And you know those alcohol-based hand sanitizers Read the rest of this entry »
There are some jobs that should be held to a higher standard. Like holding public office, or serving as a priest, or acting as someone’s surgeon. Maybe you’re about to amputate a limb…and the patient assumes you know the correct one to remove.
Well, as experience has taught us—not always.
Here’s a couple of examples of ‘oopsies’ that are unforgivable. Imagine if this happened to you…
Kerry Higuera was three months into her pregnancy when she started to bleed. Fearing a miscarriage, she headed to her local emergency room. It seemed the prudent thing to do.
According to CNN she was put in a room that February morning last year in Arizona and was told to wait until a nurse came by to get her.
Soon enough a nurse poked her head in and said, “Kerry?” Kerry said yes, she was Kerry. Well, off they go to the CT scan room. “Is this really what I need to have done,” asks a reluctant Kerry, assuming that radiating her abdomen containing a three-month-old fetus can’t be healthy. The answer was yes. “This is what the doctor wants…”
You can imagine Kerry’s panic when, soon after having the CT scan on her abdomen Higuera was visited by the emergency room physician, two radiologists and someone representing the Read the rest of this entry »
In light of the recent release of the results from the ARBITER 6-HALTS trial regarding Zetia and Niaspan, there may be questions about what drug studies are and why they are important. This week, Pleading Ignorance examines drug studies: what they do, what they don’t do and what you should know about them.
The names of the drug studies are impressive, aren’t they? Names like ARIBITER 6-HALTS, ENHANCE, RECORD and so on. The fancy thing is that all the letters in the names mean something (an acronym!)—but no one ever remembers what the heck they mean, save of course the folks conducting the test. So the catchy name is fine for the rest of us. (By the way, ARBITER 6 HALTS stands for “Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6–HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies“—say that fast 6 times). Once you’re beyond the name though, it’s important to know at what point in time the study is being done—after all, the studies are designed to show something. The timing in which the drug is tested will clue you in to what information the researchers are looking for.
Drug studies that are done before the drug is approved by the FDA (known as clinical trials), are done to prove…
If the studies are done after the drug is approved, they may be done to… Read the rest of this entry »
Actually I can. You know how drug advertisements look in magazines—it can be like 3 pages of text (aka “product disclosure”) that runs on and on and interrupts whatever you’re reading. Heaven help you if you’re reading Reader’s Digest where 3 pages suddenly becomes 5 due to the smaller format. And if you do take a moment to glance at the ad, you’ve got to be thinking that something that takes that much explaining maybe shouldn’t be taken at all. Be that as it may, enter the brave new world of online advertising…
Well, there’s just no room online to be putting all that junk. Those tightly designed banner ads would become full-page ads with all the disclosure notices included and I guarantee that after coming face to face with a few “impressions” of those, you’ll never click on that website again.
And don’t the drug companies know it. But they need to be pushing their wares online—that’s where all the “growth” is these days. So now, get this—the drug industry’s big guys like Eli Lilly and Pfizer are turning to the FDA for guidance on how to push their goods online. Why? The current FDA guidelines for advertising in traditional print media (magazines, newspapers) or t.v. require all that disclosure information is shown prominently. But there aren’t really any guidelines set for new media—so everyone’s playing by the rules of traditional media, and clearly that’s not good.
Not good for who? Big pharma, but also the bigger online media companies. See the online Read the rest of this entry »
So you caught the news recently that Merck’s Gardasil was approved by the FDA for use in boys ages 9 to 26. No one really expects much from this news—ie, doctors aren’t expected to be offering it to their male patients (or their parents as the case may be). But I find it interesting none the less.
First, the background…Gardasil is the vaccine that’s supposed immunize young girls (ages 9 – 26) from the HPV virus—aka, human papillomavirus, the sexually transmitted one that can lead to cervical cancer. There’s a lot of heated debate on Gardasil in girls–we’ve blogged on it as well–and the New York Times recently reported that in order to be effectively immunized with Gardasil, it requires a series of three injections, each costing $130 (translation, around $400; translation, it ain’t cheap).
But now let’s just take a look at that NYT report again. I read on through the whole article…la Read the rest of this entry »