Personal Injury Archive

FDA Taking Baby Steps on BPA

January 21st, 2010. By Hunter West

Last week the US Food and Drug Administration did an about-face on its stance with regard to bisphenol-A (BPA), saying Friday that it has had “some concern about the potential effects of BPA on the brain, behavior and prostate gland of fetuses, infants and children,” and would join other federal health agencies in studying the chemical in both animals and humans. 

This, in contrast to its report of 2008, when the agency deemed the chemical safe. 

Not that the FDA is saying that BPA is unsafe. Far from it. “If we thought it was unsafe, we would be taking strong regulatory action,” said Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, the principal deputy commissioner of the drug agency, at a news briefing late last week. 

However, it is a hint—baby steps here—that the FDA is taking a harder line on issues than it appeared to take previous to the Obama Administration. Needless to say safety advocates are buoyed by the change of position, short of being overjoyed given their entrenched view that the FDA has not gone far enough. 

The chemical industry from whence the BPA originates, is also not happy with the news. 

Hardly surprising, as both camps line up and defend their respective positions—the chemical industry saying that the FDA’s concerns are unfounded, while the safety advocates say the FDA hasn’t gone far enough. Then there’s the FDA, trying to come up in the middle and be fair to everybody. 

But at least they’re looking. Rather than remain cocooned in a kind of Pleasantville (the movie, with apologies to any real ‘Pleasantvilles’ out there), outfitted with blinders and assuming that everybody, everywhere will be doing Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: BPA, FDA
Posted in Personal Injury | No Comments »

Abuse is Abuse, Regardless of Gender

January 14th, 2010. By Hunter West

In late 2009 an upscale New York restaurant was hit with a lawsuit by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for alleged harassment against male employees by other male employees. The alleged abuse includes attempts to grab buttocks and genitals, pushing one’s body against another in a sexually suggestive fashion and the verbalization of crude, lewd and obscene comments. 

In Arizona, another EEOC lawsuit charged that male employees in the kitchen at a food preparation facility abused other male employees—including allegations of simulated rape. That incident resulted in the payout of a settlement benefitting the allegedly harassed workers.

It used to be that harassment was all about abuse against women—which is serious, of course. But equally serious is abuse against men. And it’s about time. 

Abuse, is abuse regardless of which gender is involved. And it’s a relief to see that men are now having the balls to admit to being harassed, either by male or female and are standing up for their rights. 

Thus, the courts should reflect just what is going on out there. And what is going on out there, along with harassment against women, is harassment against men. 

Face it, men have been abused for years. But the man never came forward. Doing so would be ‘unmanly,’ an Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: Abuse, Sexual Harassment
Posted in Personal Injury | 3 Comments »

You can sue Tobacco, but it may cost you

January 13th, 2010. By AbiK

If you’ve been keeping up with the news on smoking lawsuits, you’ll know that Florida is the hotbed for action right now. Ever since the Florida Supreme Court threw out a $145 billion judgement against Philip Morris et al in 2006, the road has been opened up for smokers to file individual lawsuits against the tobacco company.

And so they have. But there’s a twist here.

Just yesterday, we learned that ex-smoker Jerome Cohen dropped his lawsuit against Philip Morris. Any time someone—a former smoker—drops their lawsuit against a tobacco company you begin to wonder why. Well, in this instance, Cohen’s lawyer, Philip Gerson, was quoted in the Associated Press as saying that Cohen’s health was the issue—he has lung cancer.

But other reports bring up another little-known—or little publicized—issue: in Florida, if a plaintiff refuses a settlement offer, continues on with their case and loses—or, according to smokersinfo.net, wins a judgement of at least 25 percent less than the defendant’s original offer, the defendant may seek attorney fees and costs from the plaintiff.

And that can be mucho dinero. Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris, said in a statement earlier in the week that two other Florida smokers recently had to cough up $100,000 and $30,000 respectively—to Philip Morris—upon losing their cases.

Hard to imagine, but true. And that may well give pause to some indivduals who might otherwise file a lawsuit against Philip Morris.

I tend to look at the consequences of smoking as a mixed responsibility thing—that is, if you started smoking prior to Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: Florida, Philip Morris, tobacco
Posted in Personal Injury | 24 Comments »

Pole-Dancing Workout Leads to Lawsuit

January 8th, 2010. By AbiK

I’m on the fence (vs. the pole) on this one. Here’s the low-down (via nydailynews):

• NY Dermatologist Sue Ann Wee is suing Crunch gym (that’s not her, or Crunch in the vid).
• She was taking a pole-dancing workout class.
• She had signed up for a free class (aka, this was apparently her first go at the pole)
• Wee’s suit claims she was left un-spotted (or unsupervised) while upside down on the pole.
• She alleges to have asked her instructor for help.
• She fell.
• She got injured.
• She was out of work for 6 months.

Now, all I know is this (and I feel like I’m channeling Oprah’s , “What I know for sure”):

• If I’m taking a pole-dancing workout class, at the very least I want the equivalent of those mats you see pole vaulters flying into under me. I know that I am not a professional pole dancer.
• If I’m thinking of maintaining a professional career image, I’m not thinking I’ll have my lawsuit involving a pole dance blasted all over the media (time to channel Seinfeld: “Not that there’s anything wrong with that” (i.e., pole dancing)).
• If I’m taking a first-at-bat exercise class of any sort, I’m going into it fully mindful of any potential limitations my body–or whatever it might encounter–might have.  I know I won’t be hanging upside-down from a pole between my legs, simulating some form of gyration or twist with the rest of my bod, and thinking, hey—next up: audition for Cirque du Soleil. I know hanging upside-down by my feet on the pole is an advanced pole dancing move (see the vid, from Polercise Tenerife).

Having said that, I am me and Sue Ann Wee is herself. We do not “know” the same things apparently. And, alas, Crunch gym is being sued. Not that they don’t have any responsibility in this—if the allegations are true, shame on them—particularly with a seemingly novice student. We’ll see where this one goes…

Tags: pole dance, sue ann wee
Posted in Personal Injury | No Comments »

Moose Takes Nose Dive into Diner

January 4th, 2010. By AbiK

When was the last time you stepped into a place that used taxidermy as art? It actually hasn’t been that long for me—just last week in fact at Thomas Edison’s house in West Orange, NJ. But before that, it was a college-aged roadtrip to a rinky-dink bar in the backwoods of Amish country—the sort of place loaded with baseball caps, beards, camouflage attire—and Red White & Blue on tap. And more animal heads on the walls than patrons on barstools—one assumes, even on a good night. 

And that’s the interesting thing about taxidermy—it’s equally high-end or low-brow—and, it’s pretty polarizing to boot. 

But now it’s the center of a NYC personal injury lawsuit. Not taxidermy in general, but one moose head in particular—or as has been reported in the NY Daily News, a caribou head. 

It seems that Raina Kumra was dining under the aforementioned head on October 4^th when she came head-to-head (forgive the pun) with it. Lucky for her it wasn’t antler-to-head. Be that as it may, she’s since sued the eatery, White Slab Palace, which is located at Delancey and Allen in NYC. What she’s suing for is an “unspecified amount”; what she’s suing for is, according to the suit, that she’s “lost cognitive skills and suffered chronic neck pain, fatigue, dizzy spells and anxiety from mounting medical expenses.” 

I can only imagine that Ms. Kumra was a tad bit embarrassed in the aftermath of the moose (er, caribou) lunging at her. And let’s face it, with a reported weight of 150 lbs. and an antler span of Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: moose head, Raina Kumra, restaurant
Posted in Personal Injury | No Comments »