Settlement Archive

White Guy Nets $3.25M Verdict in Racial Discrimination Case

August 16th, 2013. By AbiK

Racial discrimination is something we’ve come to associate with minority groups—it’s rare that you see an item in the press about a non-minority being the victim of such discrimination, outside of say the occasional affirmative action case related to college admissions.

But, what if someone from the majority is actually part of the minority in a work situation? That’s what happened in a recent court case involving the city of Los Angeles.

In James Duffy v. City of Los Angeles, Duffy, a 63-year old Caucasian man who’d been working for the City’s Department of Recreation and Parks as a gardener for 19 years, alleged racial discrimination against his Hispanic foreman and coworkers. According to court documents, Duffy’s foreman, Abel Perez, allegedly began discriminating against Duffy upon becoming his foreman back in 2004.

Duffy claimed he was forced to retire after several discriminatory events took place—including some harassing incidents that happened after Duffy had suffered an on-the-job head injury, resulting in short-term memory problems. According to the filing, Duffy stated he’d complained to his supervisors several times but to no avail.

Some of the alleged discriminatory actions included Perez once stating “I hate white people.” Perez would also allegedly tell Duffy he hadn’t been given certain assignments when he had or that he failed to complete assignments he had never actually been given.

The complaint also stated the city of Los Angeles engaged in intentional racial discrimination by maintaining a “systematic and continuous policy and goal of firing and demoting Caucasian employees”—and that the city took no action after Duffy had made numerous complaints about the harassment he was enduring.

The case, James Duffy v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, Central , BC454369, went before a jury and a verdict was returned in favor of Duffy. The $3,255,000 verdict was unanimous on claims of disability and racial harassment, retaliation and discrimination by the City of Los Angeles and three of Duffy’s supervisors. The verdict comprised $380,000 in economic damages and $2,875,000 in non-economic damages.

Tags: Abel Perez, City of Los Angeles, Disability Discrimination, James Duffy, racial discrimination
Posted in Discrimination, lawsuits, Settlement | 16 Comments »

Asbestos News Roundup: 8.15.13 – 6 States with Highest Rate of Mesothelioma

August 15th, 2013. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map

6 States with Highest Rate of Mesothelioma Include States with Major Shipyards

US Navy Veterans have some of the highest incidence of mesothelioma, or asbestos related lung cancers of all Americans. This is because during the 1950’s, 1960’s, 1970’s, and 1980’s asbestos was used on most parts of all US Navy ships, especially in engine rooms, ammunition magazines, repair rooms, fuel storage areas, and or electronics areas.

Currently, there are over 20 million US Navy veterans, many of whom will have worked at Navy shipyards across the US. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the six states that see the highest rate of individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma include Maine, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington. Both Washington, and Maine have major shipyards. Other states with major shipyards include California, Virginia, Louisiana, Alabama, Maryland, and Texas.

Sadly, US Navy veterans aren’t the only group of people at high risk for asbestos disease stemming from workplace exposure. Aside from shipyards, power plants, manufacturing factories, chemical plants, oil refineries, steel mills, mines, smelters, aerospace manufacturing facilities, demolition construction work sites, railroads repair yards, automotive manufacturing facilities, or auto brake repair shops, also posed or pose significant risks for asbestos exposure, particularly for people working in these areas during the 1950s through to the end of the 1980s.

Asbestos Lawsuits

Jefferson County, TX: Three people have filed an asbestos lawsuit naming four defendant companies as responsible for the diagnosis of asbestos related disease in one of the plaintiffs.

The defendants named in the complaint are Atlantic Richfield Co., Beazer East Inc., Certainteed Corp. and Guard-Line Inc. Audrey J. Hawkins, Terri Banken and Gina Daigle claim Floyd Hawkins was diagnosed with lung cancer as a result of ongoing asbestos exposure through the course of his work, specifically through large amounts of asbestos in products manufactured, sold, designed, supplied, distributed, mined, milled, relabeled, resold, processed, applied or installed by the defendants.

Floyd Hawkins’s disease resulted from inhaling, ingesting or otherwise absorbing asbestos fibers while at work, the plaintiffs claim in their suit. They further allege that Mr. Hawkins was not at any time during his work, aware or made aware of the hazards of asbestos exposure.

According to the complaint, the defendants failed to adequately warn Floyd Hawkins of the serious health hazards related to asbestos exposure and failed to provide him with what would be considered adequate and safe working apparel.

Further, the defendants failed to provide Mr. Hawkins with a safe workplace and allowed dangerous conditions to exist, the complaint states. The defendants also allegedly were negligent in that they failed to test their products before they were released into the stream of commerce; failed to place warning labels on the asbestos products; failed to warn Floyd Hawkins on the proper way to handle asbestos products; failed to enforce a safety plan; and failed to follow government regulations. Because of his disease, Floyd Hawkins experienced physical pain, suffering and mental anguish; endured emotional distress and physical impairment; and incurred medical costs, the complaint says.

Floyd Hawkins children also claim that following the death of their father they suffered the loss of his care, maintenance, support, services, advice, counsel and reasonable contributions and suffered mental anguish. (setexasrecord.com)

Asbestos Settlements

Plaquemine, LA: A retired electrician who filed an asbestos lawsuit in Louisiana has been awarded by the jury hearing his case, nearly $6 million finding that his alleged asbestos exposures at a Dow Chemical facility was a factor in causing his mesothelioma.

At the end of the trial, which ran four weeks, the Louisiana 18th Judicial District Court for Iberville Parish jury held trial defendant Dow Chemical responsible under theories of negligence and unreasonably dangerous premises. Dow Chemical and Westgate, an electrical contractor and the plaintiff’s former employer, were the only defendants remaining at the time of the verdict. (Harrismartin.com)

 

Tags: Asbestos, asbestos lawsuit, Asbestos Mesothelioma
Posted in Asbestos Mesothelioma, lawsuits, Settlement | No Comments »

Asbestos News Roundup: 8.1.13 – US Asbestos Use on Rise in some Industries

August 1st, 2013. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map.

Asbestos Use in the US on the Rise in Some Industries

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO), the largest independent asbestos victims’ organization in the U.S., today announced that President and Co-Founder Linda Reinstein will testify about the dangers of asbestos before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW).

Ms. Reinstein will discuss the facts about the continued use of lethal asbestos in the U.S., with ports in the states of Louisiana, Texas, California and New Jersey still actively receiving and unloading asbestos shipments. Reinstein will also reference the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) report that states that U.S. asbestos consumption in 2012 was estimated to be 1,060 tons. In the past two years, the nation has seen an increase in asbestos consumption in the chlor-alkali industry specifically, even though viable and affordable asbestos substitutes exist.

Asbestos fibers are odorless, tasteless, indestructible, and can be nearly 700 times smaller than a human hair. All forms of asbestos can cause cancer and respiratory diseases.

Each year, an estimated 10,000 Americans die from asbestos-related disease: 3,000 from mesothelioma, 5,000 from lung cancer, and 2,000 from other cancers or respiratory diseases. Between 2000 and 2010, 43,464 Americans died from mesothelioma and asbestosis – just two of the leading asbestos-caused diseases. (ADAO)

Asbestos Lawsuits

Oakland, CA: A take-home or second hand asbestos lawsuit brought by the wife of a retired Bay Area ironworker will be allowed to move forward. Donald LeBoa worked for hundreds of days on the construction of the Bank of America high rise building in San Francisco in the late 1960’s. According to court documents, the project involved a continuous sweeping of dry oversprayed fireproofing in the building, which caused large amounts of asbestos-containing dust to become airborne.

The asbestos in the air fell on everyone in the area, including Mr. LeBoa, whose work clothes became covered with asbestos dust, according to court documents. Mr. LeBoa wore his work clothes home every day and his wife washed them. Mrs. LeBoa shook out the dust from her husband’s clothes before putting them in the washing machine with the rest of the laundry.

Mrs. LeBoa was diagnosed in 2012 with mesothelioma, a fatal cancer. According to court documents, the asbestos on her husband’s work clothes allegedly caused Mrs. LeBoa’s mesothelioma.

The sweeping work that created the asbestos dust that fell onto Mr. LeBoa’s work clothes was performed by a company called Cahill. According to court documents, Cahill allegedly did not try to control the asbestos dust in the building nor did Cahill warn anyone of its risks.

Mrs. LeBoa sought compensation from Cahill, along with other defendants, in a take-home exposure asbestos lawsuit (LeBoa v. Alta Building Material Co., et al., Alameda County Superior Court, No. RG13667129) for its role in causing her harm. According to court documents, Cahill asked the court to dismiss the case, arguing that a person exposed to deadly dust tracked into her home should have no right to file a lawsuit. Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee disagreed with Cahill and allowed Mrs. LeBoa’s case to move forward. The judge’s order explained, “Cahill has not made a sufficient legal argument to induce this court to establish a new rule of law and grant it summary judgment under that new rule.”

According to court documents, trial for this take-home exposure asbestos lawsuit begins on August 13, 2013 against Cahill and the other defendants. (prweb.com)

Asbestos Settlements

Buffalo, NY: An upstate New York jury has awarded $3 million in an asbestos gasket and packing case against Crane Co., finding the defendant 35 percent liable for the decedent’s asbestos mesothelioma.

The New York Supreme Court for Erie County jury reached the verdict on July 31 after two days of deliberations. Judge Jeremiah J. Moriarty III presided over the two-week trial.

In its verdict, the jury awarded $2.5 million to decedent Lee Holdsworth and $500,000 to his widow. An additional $67,700 was issued for Holdsworth’s medical bills. (Harrismartin.com)

Asbestos Law

Boston, MA: The state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has fined a Haverhill company $3,000 by for its failure to follow proper asbestos-removal procedures at a job site in Fitchburg last summer.

According to a recent press release, during an August 2012 inspection of the former Fitchburg Gas and Electric power plant site, at 115 Sawyer Passway, Fitchburg, DEP inspectors observed workers from Absolute Environmental Contractors, Inc., improperly handling and disposing of asbestos-insulated pipes.

According to the DEP, the pipes were placed in an open-top, roll-off container without being adequately wetted or sealed in leak-tight, labeled containers, as required by law.

State regulations require removal contractors to wet asbestos-containing materials thoroughly during all phases of removal, handling and packaging for disposal in order to minimize the potential for asbestos fibers to become airborne and reduce the chance of exposure for workers and the public.

Absolute Environmental Contractors is licensed by the state Department of Labor Standards to be an asbestos contractor.

“Licensed asbestos contractors are most certainly aware of the required asbestos-removal procedures and must strictly follow all work practices prescribed by the MassDEP asbestos regulations,” said Lee Dillard Adams, director of the DEP Central Regional Office in Worcester. “The cost of noncompliance includes payment of penalties and escalated cleanup, decontamination and monitoring costs.” (sentinelandenterprise)

 

Tags: Asbestos, asbestos lawsuit, Asbestos Mesothelioma
Posted in Asbestos Mesothelioma, lawsuits, Settlement | No Comments »

Asbestos News Roundup: 7.25.13 – Ford Cited for Worker Asbestos Exposure

July 25th, 2013. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map.

US Navy Veterans at Risk for Asbestos

US Navy Veterans are at high risk for asbestos-related disease, due to their asbestos exposure while working on navy ships undergoing refits, for example. But because asbestos-related disease can take up to 30 years or more to manifest, it is often detected long after men have left the Navy.

The states with the most US Navy Veterans include California, Florida, New York, Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Arizona, Massachusetts, Washington, Maine, Oregon, Arizona, Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Montana, Kansas, North Dakota, Hawaii, Nebraska, and Mississippi.

US Navy Veterans are not the only group of workers at high risk for asbestos exposure. Men and women who worked in power plants, manufacturing factories, chemical plants, oil refineries, mines, smelters, aerospace manufacturing facilities, demolition construction work sites, railroads, automotive manufacturing facilities, or auto brake shops may also have been exposed to high levels of asbestos.

Asbestos Law – Ford Cited for Exposing Workers to Asbestos

Detroit, MI: Ford Motor Co exposes its workers to asbestos, according to a report by The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Earlier this week, the federal agency cited Ford for eight violations covering asbestos exposure at a stamping plant in Buffalo, N.Y.

Ford could face up to $41,800 in fines for failing to protect workers from asbestos-containing material at the plant, according to OSHA.

Among the violations is the exposure of a pipefitter to asbestos-containing material in the insulation of a steam line he was working on. Additionally, none of the workers who were exposed to asbestos-containing materials wore respiratory protection.

OHSA also reported that the workers’ area was not properly organized to limit the amount of employees working in the area, asbestos-contained areas were not properly cordoned off, and airborne levels of the hazardous mineral were not properly monitored.

Violations are defined as “serious” when death or significant injury to workers is likely from a problem that Ford knew or should have known about, according to the agency.

Ford has 15 business days from when it received the citations to comply, meet with local OSHA officials, or contest the citations. The factory employs 537 workers, according to Ford. (autonews.com)

Asbestos Settlements

New York, NY: An 81-year-old Los Angeles man and his wife have been awarded a $1.525 million verdict in his asbestos-cancer lawsuit this July.

In May of 2012, Marty Marteney, a successful architect whose father was an immigrant to the United States from Mexico, was diagnosed with asbestos mesothelioma. After a three week trial, a Los Angeles jury returned a verdict on July 1 in favor of Marteney, giving him a judgment against Union Carbide Corporation and Elementis Chemicals, Inc.

According to the attorneys representing the Marteneys, Mr. Marteney’s disease stemmed from his exposure to workers who used asbestos-containing construction products and automotive parts. Union Carbide was a supplier of asbestos fiber and Elementis was the distributor of Union Carbide’s asbestos on the West Coast.

Marteney’s asbestos exposure goes back to his childhood, when his father took him out of school and made him work in his father’s auto shop, where he handled these toxic materials without any knowledge of their danger.

Without an education and with no knowledge of his asbestos exposure, Marteney enlisted in the armed forces, started a family, and later became an apprentice architect.

Eventually Mr. Marteney returned to school and built a career as a well-respected architect, designing homes for the rich and famous in Beverly Hills. Unknowingly, this hard work exposed him to asbestos-containing construction products that would later cause the cancer that would ruin his well-deserved retirement.

Mr. Marteney is currently undergoing treatment for his mesothelioma. Marteney lives in San Marino, California, with his wife. (watchlist.com)

New York, NY: An asbestos verdict of $190 million has been awarded in a lawsuit brought by five men who were exposed to asbestos-tainted products and equipment during their jobs as steamfitters, plumbers, and construction workers.

A panel of New York Supreme Court jurors found the two defendant companies had acted negligently and recklessly, then rendering a verdict worth a total of $190 million, the largest consolidated asbestos verdict in New York history. It is believed that the $60 million individual amounts two of the men received are the largest individual sums awarded in a New York asbestos case.

Daniel Blouin, an attorney with Weitz & Luxenberg, the firm representing the plaintiffs, said he and his team tackled the case by telling the jury a story of five men who worked honest jobs for decades only to be repaid with immense suffering. “We wanted to show the jury the sorrow our clients were and are going through,” Blouin said. “And not just physically but psychologically. Once you are exposed to asbestos and develop mesothelioma, you know your fate. It’s an unbearably heavy burden.”

Lawyers for the plaintiffs told the jury there wasn’t an amount they could give the men that would be unreasonable. The defendants in this case subjected thousands of men and women to a terribly toxic substance. It is likely the companies took a calculated risk in doing so. That isn’t a debt that can be repaid, the attorneys said.

The jury, returning a verdict at 4 p.m. on July 23, found both defendants—boiler companies Cleaver Brooks and Burnham—negligent in having failed to warn about the dangers of the asbestos used in connection with their equipment. The verdict said both companies had acted with reckless disregard for human life.

All five of the plaintiffs were tradesmen from the tri-state area.

One man, from Toms River, NJ, worked in the 50s and 60s as a pipefitter in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. He was exposed to asbestos daily while fitting pipes into the salt-water distilling units aboard aircraft carriers like the USS Constellation and USS Independence.

Another, from Oyster Bay, NY, worked for nearly 30 years as a plumber, handling dozens of different types of products contaminated with asbestos.

A third, of Middle Village, NY, was also exposed to asbestos working as a plumber in Brooklyn, Queens, and Rockland Co.

Another man, from Howard Beach, NY, was exposed to asbestos on the job as a painter and construction worker. He was involved with the removal and demolition of boilers containing asbestos-laden parts.

The final client, from Kent, CT, also worked with boilers and boiler parts in the course of his job as a steamfitter.

All five men developed mesothelioma as a result of asbestos exposure. Three have died of complications related to the disease.

The trial (Index Nos. 190008/12, 190026/12, 190200/12, 190183/12, 190184/12) was held in New York Supreme Court before Judge Joan Madden. (pr.com/press-release)

Tags: Asbestos, asbestos lawsuit, Asbestos Mesothelioma
Posted in Asbestos Mesothelioma, Emerging Issues, lawsuits, Settlement | No Comments »

Asbestos News Roundup: 4.11.13 – Surgeon General’s Asbestos Statement

April 11th, 2013. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map.

No Safe Level of Asbestos Exposure – Surgeon General Issues Statement

On April 1, 2013, as part of National Asbestos Awareness Week, the US Surgeon General, Dr. Regina Benjamin, issued a statement concerning asbestos exposure. In short, the message is that there is no safe level of asbestos exposure.

In fact, the statement notes “that anyone who disturbs asbestos is at risk. However, it is of special concern for construction, insulation, and demolition workers, pipefitters, boilermakers and others who might disturb asbestos found in old buildings or equipment as part of their work. The hazard is also very real to home handymen, first-responders, and community volunteers.”

Veterans who served in any of the following occupations may have also been exposed to asbestos: mining, milling, shipyard work, insulation work, demolition of old buildings, carpentry and construction, manufacturing and installation of products such as flooring and roofing.

Additionally, veterans who served in Iraq and other countries in that region could have been exposed to asbestos when older buildings were damaged and the contaminant released into the air.

The Surgeon General’s statement explains that asbestos exposure can happen from activity that disturbs asbestos, making the asbestos fibers airborne. Inhaling these fibers leads to asbestos-related diseases. Three of the major health effects associated with asbestos exposure are lung cancer; mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer that is found in the thin lining of the lungs, chest, abdomen and heart; and asbestosis, a serious progressive, long-term, non-cancer disease of the lungs. Specifically:

Asbestosis – Scarring of lung tissue that causes breathing problems, usually in workers exposed to asbestos in workplaces before the Federal government began regulating asbestos use (mid-1970s).

Pleural plaques – Scarring in the inner surface of the ribcage and area surrounding the lungs that can cause breathing problems, though usually not as serious as asbestosis. People living in areas with high environmental levels of asbestos, as well as workers, can develop pleural plaques.

Cancer – The two types of cancer caused by exposure to asbestos are lung cancer and mesothelioma, a cancer of the thin lining surrounding the lung (pleural membrane) or abdominal cavity (the peritoneum). Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer usually caused by asbestos exposure.

Asbestos Lawsuits

Charleston, WV: Wayne Junior Rider, who was diagnosed with an asbestos related lung injury on January 28, 2012, has filed an asbestos lawsuit naming 55 companies he alleges are responsible for his illness.

In his lawsuit, Rider claims the defendants exposed him to asbestos and/or asbestos-containing products during his employment at various work sites in and around West Virginia from 1944 until 1980.

Rider is suing the defendants based upon the theories of negligence, contaminated buildings, breach of expressed/implied warranty, strict liability, intentional tort, conspiracy, misrepresentation and post-sale duty to warn.

Certain defendants are also being sued as premises owners and as Rider’s employers for deliberate intent/intentional tort, according to the lawsuit.

The 55 defendants in the suit include: 3M Company; A.C.F. Industries; A.W. Chesterton Company; Aurora Pump Company; Borg-Warner Corporation; Brand Insulations, Inc.; Buffalo Pumps, Inc.; CBS Corporation; Certainteed Corporation; and Cleaver-Brooks Company, Inc. (wvrecord.com)

Jefferson County, TX: Ann Skelton, the recent widow of Robert Skelton, has filed an asbestos lawsuit naming E.I. DuPont De Nemours as the defendant. In her lawsuit, Skelton claims the company exposed her late husband to asbestos throughout the course of his career, and that exposure subsequently led to the illness which caused his death.

According to the lawsuit, DuPont employed Robert at its Beaumont Works facility, where he was exposed to asbestos containing products.

The lawsuit alleges that as a result, he developed lung cancer, “from which he died a painful and terrible death on February 6, 2013.”

The defendant is accused of using benzene products without warning workers of the health risks and failing to take proper safety precautions. Skelton alleges the defendant acted with malice, entitling her to exemplary damages. (setexasrecord.com)

Tags: Asbestos, asbestos lawsuit, Asbestos Settlement, asbestosis, mesothelioma
Posted in Asbestos Mesothelioma, lawsuits, Settlement | No Comments »