Do you mind me venting?
I have just been put on a statin because my cholesterol is too high. Apparently my doctor says, at 54, I am at a high risk for heart attack and stroke.
Nice. This, in spite of the fact I have no history of heart disease in my family, I have never smoked, I have exercised semi-regularly and have always watched my weight.
Okay, maybe I haven’t been watching what I eat. I like my steaks and prime rib like everybody else. Butter on popcorn, if you please. And perhaps, on occasion, a beer or two, too many.
And okay, while never an exercise demon I was always a fairly active guy. Rode my bike to work. In the late 90’s I took up walking for health, and to lose a few pounds. Then in 2002 I took up running. I ran a half-marathon in under two hours. And I trained for a full marathon (although I never completed the actual race). I got myself down to my high school weight of 129.
But for the past five years I haven’t done a lot, due to work commitments. Is that the reason for my current troubles? Can five years of inactivity cancel out 40 years of fairly active living?
I guess…
So now I’m on low-dose Aspirin once a day, to thin the blood out. And now, as of last night, I’m on a statin to reduce my bad cholesterol.
Overall, statins are considered good things. And not all statins are created equal. Thankfully, I’m not on Zocor, or Vytorin. I’m on another one. But at 10mg, I’m on the highest dose possible. “Pretty high-octane stuff,” my pharmacist tells me.
Suddenly, I’m a member of a group I write about. People who ingest all manner of drugs to keep their health in check at the behest of their doctor. Yes, there are always side effects. That’s a given—thanks in part to the mantra of the FDA that suggests a drug is okay to put on the market if the benefits outweigh the risks.
Apparently, in my case, the benefit certainly outweighs the risks. If I don’t get my cholesterol down, I’m in line for a major stroke or heart attack.
But what are the risks?
Muscle pain, I was told—affecting about 10 percent of the population who use a statin. The single-page summary that came with the drug basically didn’t go into greater detail than that.
Okay, I’m a journalist, right? So I dig out the label, tucked inside with the medicine that is supposed to explain all the bad side effects.
Apparently, along with muscle pain, tenderness or weakness, I could encounter brown urine (nice), difficulty breathing or swallowing, swelling of the tongue, or hives. Those are the serious side effects. The more rudimentary complaints may amount to stomach pain, dizziness (I already have that, thanks in part to partial blockages in the carotid arteries in my neck), headache, and even constipation.
So let’s look on LawyersandSettlements.com, shall we? On statins. And specifically, Crestor (which is what I’m taking).
Just key in the word ‘statins’ in the search window off the landing page, and the first thing you come to is ‘Statins Side Effects, Rhabdomylosis, Cardiomyopathy, Statin Lawsuit.”
Oh, I feel better already.
Click on the link (as if you haven’t already) and you land on the Statins page, which reminds you that Rhabdomyolysis is more than just muscle pain, folks. It’s a serious condition that sees muscle tissue broken down and entering the bloodstream. It can be fatal.
Nice.
Then there’s Cardiomyopathy, which is the weakening of the heart muscle that could lead to a heart attack.
What? Am I not taking this stuff to prevent a heart attack?
Oh, look—here’s a link to the statin I’m now taking…Crestor.
Here’s a fetching article by LawyersandSettlements.com writer Heidi Turner back in May that puts a focus on cardiomyopathy, and new research that is scaring the bejeebers out of me. Jennifer Graney is a nurse who has researched statin side effects, Turner writes.
“The issue is that statins consistently lower the coenzyme Q12 levels and create an increase in heart failure,” Graney says. “Anyone who takes it is at risk of cardiomyopathy, which is an enlargement of the heart that can lead to heart failure. We were aware that myopathies—general muscle problems—are related to statins but we’re starting to figure out that cardiomyopathies are also linked to statins.”
Another study, from back in 2005, concluded, “statin-related side effects, including statin cardiomyopathy, are far more common than previously published and are reversible with the combination of statin discontinuation and supplemental CoQ10.”
Here’s the thing—nowhere in the rather involved label information that came with my medication (that most people don’t read anyway) does it make any mention of cardiomyopathy or rhabdomyolysis. No mention that it might be a risk, or even the fact that studies are ongoing and those patients should proceed at their own risk.
No wonder people sue drug manufacturers. All my doctor mentioned was the potential for muscle pain. He said Crestor was “a good drug.” The pharmacist mentioned muscle pain. And in the labeling information, ‘muscle pain that you can’t explain’ is the first item on a rather short list of what are identified as ‘Serious Side Effects.’
Nobody mentioned the potential for the disintegration of my muscles into my bloodstream. Nowhere does it mention that my heart may enlarge and I might keel over simply because I needed to get my cholesterol in check.
Somebody mentioned something about my liver…
Maybe it’s inconclusive. Maybe the health regulator isn’t ready to lower the hammer on the Crestor manufacturer by ordering more detailed labeling about those two potential side effects.
Still, I feel like I’m being led down the garden path, here. And if I die tomorrow from cardiomyopathy because I’m taking Crestor for my cholesterol, I’ll sue the bastards (okay, I’ll leave that to my family). All I was told was muscle pain. The rest, I’ve found out on my own.
Somebody should have said something.
I’ve always maintained that America relies too much on drugs—something which the drug companies are just fine with, thank you. But they’re out to make money first and foremost—I doubt whether my overall health comes anywhere near where the profit-loss statement sits on the radar. I’ve always questioned the motivation, when a drug company puts a new drug out, or a doctor prescribes a new drug. What’s really going on, here?
I told my doctor early on that I wanted to control my cholesterol through diet and exercise, rather than taking a drug, Apparently, I’m too far gone for that. At least for the moment.
So I’ll take the damn things as long as I need to, then I’ll cut them loose.
In the meantime, I’ll let you know how I make out. Hopefully, I’ll be fine—and the statin will work for me like the medical advocates say that it will.
That said, if I wind up going for a wild ride along the adverse reaction freeway, you’ll be hearing from me too.
If you want to see the actual list of statin AEs (adverse effects) see this study from 2009:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC28499…
now for the worst news, the long term effect of CO-Q10 depletion can be mitochondrial dysfunction that does not go away when you quit statins. I can attest to the horrors that come with that. Then when you learn that cholesterol is NOT the devil that the drug companies would have you believe you begin to see the pure evil in this situation. All cause mortality is lowest at a TC level of 272, well above "recommendations"…what a fraud.. I suggest you visit the following site for the truth!
http://www.spacedoc.com/
put together by a retired physician, former astronaut, and space medicine researcher who is, like me and many, many others a STATIN VICTIM…..read some of the posts on his forums and I suspect you will stop the statin right away!
You should look into Dr. William Davis' blogs and sites, called "The heart scan blog" and Track Your Plack.
He helps people reverse heart disease and arterial plaque, often without drugs (he's a cardiologist): http://www.trackyourplaque.com/blog/ and scroll down for his posts. He is often able to get people off statins. Also, look into a supplement called Sytrinol, clinnically tested to help lower LDL and triglycerides by 30%.
Steve
A study done on people over 70 concluded that the higher their cholesterol, the greater their longevity. Hmmm…. I just renewed my term life insurance for 20 years (at age 57) and the upper limit of cholesterol for the "take and physical and blood work to get a discount price" was 260. I will believe actuaries before a drug company for reasons that should be self-evident. Longevity in women is not extended by statins. Only HDLs of 55+, which can be accomplished with inexpensive niacin (a B vitamin), have been correlated with longevity in women. By the way, only Lp(a) is correlated with plaque problems, so high LDLs is not an indicator for statin use; it's an indication that one needs to test further for Lp(a). Have you also noticed the increase in gout? Cholesterol is used to patch inflamed blood vessels when there is inadequate vitamin C and amino acids to repair them. (By the way, acid preventers decrease the body's ability to break down protein for digestion, putting people with heart disease in the double whammy.) Lowering cholesterol is like shooting Firemen at the seen of a fire. Causation and correlation are two very different things when it comes to good research, particularly when it relates to cholesterol and heart disease. Imagine what enzymes and vitamin C might do, along with adequate B vitamins and minerals for energy production–unfortunately, many make the wrong choice because insurance covers their prescriptions. Eventually, they find out that good health is priceless!
Please read "Statins, Side Effects and the MisGuided War on Cholesterol" by Dr.David Graveline. Cholesterol is not the cause of heart disease or heart attacks. Look at one of the side effects of statins – heart failure. There is a good reason. I had heart failure and after having an LVAD implant, began a search and program for cardiomyopathy cures. Fifteen months after the implant, I have the LVAD removed as my heart had healed. I have a lot of information on the journey and path, if interested, please contact me at . Thanks
diagnosed cardiomyopathy recently with lower EF-heart function. taking atorvastitin-lipitor for many years. please share your experience.
I have rhabdomyolysis. I would be interested in exchanging letters from anyone else with this terrible disease. I live in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and have never met anyone else with this.
Please someone, anyone answer.
Nancy