Judge To Hearst Interns: Sorry, Sue for Yourself; No Class Action Lawsuit Here

May 14th, 2013. By AbiK

Was this any surprise? The one-time Hearst intern, Xuedan Wang, aka Diana Wang—who sued Hearst (Xuedan Wang v. The Hearst Corporation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 12cv793) claiming that she and other interns at the various Hearst magazines were unfairly misclassified—has not been granted the class action lawsuit status she was after.

Wang’s initial lawsuit claimed that her unpaid internship at Harper’s Bazaar violated the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York state labor laws. (For the record, the U.S. Labor Department states that unpaid internships must be educational and “for the benefit of the intern.”)

Now, forget about the fact that many of us have done internships and we completely “got” what we willingly signed up for: on-the-job training for zero (or very low) pay and a nice addition to a resume. What Wang’s complaint stated was that, “Unpaid interns are becoming the modern-day equivalent of entry-level employees, except that employers are not paying them for the many hours they work.” Earth to Wang et al, internships at top magazines in NYC—as well as at many other places—have always been about entry-level tasks being performed by unpaid wannabes. It’s a tit-for-tat arrangement—the company gets some help, the intern scores experience and a credential. No one promised glamour and prestige—or any pay.

So somewhere along the path from Baby Boomer, to Gen X, to Gen Y/Millennials, it would appear the definition of “intern” has changed. Here are some (non-legal) definitions from Merriam-Webster and TheFreeDictionary.com, respectively, as the word relates to labor:

• an advanced student or graduate usually in a professional field (as medicine or teaching) gaining supervised practical experience (as in a hospital or classroom)
• someone, as a student or recent graduate, working as an apprentice or trainee to gain practical experience in an occupation

Seems an intern gets “practical experience”. No mention of a paycheck. And, might I add, if a paycheck were what Wang et al were after, here’s a tip: apply for a job. (fyi, here’s Merriam’s definition of “job”: “a piece of work; especially : a small miscellaneous piece of work undertaken on order at a stated rate” —note the words “stated rate”).

But, of course, why pay your dues in a highly competitive industry when you can try to file a class action lawsuit because, unlike the millions of interns who preceded you, YOU are special? Btw, if that sounds jaded or sarcastic—note that according to a Facebook page dedicated to Wang’s intern class action lawsuit attempt, she “worked seven unpaid internships before she got fed up.” SEVEN folks. At that rate, it’s kind of hard to point the finger at anyone else but Wang—and it starts to look like maybe she needed some career coaching.

If you don’t think living a fashion intern’s “Groundhog Day” x7 reveals enough about Wang’s (insert “misguided”?) approach to breaking into the glam world of haute couture and ready-to-wear, check out these Wang quotes from a NY Magazine article, “The Norma Rae of Fashion Interns”, that ran when the class action was initially filed (apologies to the real Norma Rae, Crystal Lee Sutton)—the quotes hint at a sad naivete about not only working in fashion, but also about work in general:

“I’d been dreaming of standing in their offices for fifteen years,” she says. “I was so ready to give everything I had. I couldn’t imagine that the dream of mine was becoming real.”

“This was going to be my only ticket to the industry,” she says. “I didn’t have unlimited resources. I was going to make the time worthwhile. I was going to be remembered by people.”

“I was so uncomfortable and stressed out,” she says. “It was hard to get people to understand how an intern could be stressed out, but the editors constantly stressed that this was a real job and if this went wrong or if that happened, it would be my fault.

Kind of makes you think of that sad sack who’s putting all his hopes and dreams on that one Powerball lottery ticket…sure you gotta be in it to win it, but you also have to have a realistic view of your chances.

Regardless of all that, this is indeed, about a class action lawsuit and as such, it needed to go through the rigorous review for certification. And that means that from a legal perspective, in order for there to be a “class” established for the lawsuit, certain requirements need to be met: numerosity, commonality, typicality and adequacy of representation.

According to Reuters, the judge who presided over the employment misclassification filing, U.S. District Judge Harold Baer, found that the “former interns failed to meet the bar set out in the Supreme Court’s landmark 2011 case Dukes v. Wal-Mart to constitute a class action. Specifically, Baer found that the interns did not meet the standards of commonality and predominance needed to be considered a class.”

How so?

Baer explained in his decision, “Here, while a close question, the commonality requirement is not satisfied because plaintiffs cannot show anything more than a uniform policy of unpaid internship.” That included the fact that the interns in the proposed class worked for different magazines and performed different tasks. Reuters reports that Baer also denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on whether they met the definition of an employee.

So what now?

Well, Wang et al can now try to sue Hearst individually—not as a class. Though it’s unlikely that many will choose to do so as the interns were seeking minimum wage—and the cost to litigate such a case for a net return of minimum wage minus attorney fees is probably just not worth going to the mat for…

Asbestos News Roundup: 5.9.13 – Second-Hand Asbestos Risk

May 9th, 2013. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map.

Family Members at Risk for Asbestos Disease

The recent case of John Mays, below, who died from mesothelioma, highlights how asbestos dust represents a danger not just to those who worked in heavy industry, but also to their family members who were in daily contact with them.

The lawsuit filed on behalf of the estate of the late John Mays, claims he suffered secondary asbestos exposure through his father who was a laborer. Recently, we also reported on the case of a 78-year old women succumbed to asbestos mesothelioma which she developed as a result of having breathed in second-hand asbestos fibers as she shook out the work clothes of her husband and son, who worked at a power station.

There are many cases of family members developing asbestos disease as a result of secondary asbestos exposure—secondary exposure caused, for example, by wives beating their husband’s dusty overalls as they hung on a washing line, or shaking them off in a doorway before putting them in a washing machine. Their husbands worked in industries such as mining, ship-building, construction, plumbing and electrical.

Children and even grandchildren have also been put at risk, running up to a returning parent to give them a hug as they return from work, or sitting on their knee as they wear their dusty work clothes. The risk of loved ones being accidentally exposed is unfortunate and just adds to the tragic legacy of asbestos. But as this latest case shows, it is something that family members need to be made aware of.

Asbestos Lawsuits

Schenectady, NY: An asbestos lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Norman Westover in the New York Supreme Court’s 4th Judicial District in Schenectady to recover damages for Mr. Westover’s lung cancer, which, according to the lawsuit, was allegedly caused by asbestos exposure.

According to the filed complaint, Mr. Westover was allegedly exposed to dangerous asbestos fibers on a daily basis during his twenty-plus-year career at the International Paper mill located in Ticonderoga, NY. International Paper purchased the pulp mill, which had been operating on the western shores of Lake Champlain near the Vermont border since the late 19th century, in 1926. In the late 1960s, International Paper began decommissioning the original mill and, in 1971, opened a new mill at the location which is still operating today. The mill produces 850 tons of paper a day, employs approximately 600 workers and contracts with 650 loggers and truckers in New York and Vermont.

International Paper was formed in 1898 upon the merger of 18 paper mills in the northeast. The company was responsible for supplying 60% of the newsprint in the country. International Paper’s Hudson River Mill, located in nearby Corinth, where the Sacandaga River joins the Hudson, was a major pioneer in the development of the modern paper industry. In the early 20th century, the Hudson River Mill was one of International Paper’s largest plants and served both as the company’s principal office and a place where paper workers helped shape the direction of the industry’s early labor movement.

As per the asbestos lawsuit papers, during his tenure at International Paper, Mr. Westover worked in both the original and new mill and he held a variety of positions that allegedly exposed him to asbestos fibers used in connection with mill machinery, including, but not limited to, cutters, dryers, rollers, boilers, pumps, and valves. Mr. Westover was also allegedly exposed to asbestos that was used in an abundance to insulate component parts of the original and new mill and the related piping and wiring. (digitaljournal.com)

St. Clair, IL: An asbestos lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Neda Flake-Mays, who is special administrator of the estate of John Mays, alleging 60 defendant companies caused Mays to develop lung cancer after his exposure to asbestos-containing products throughout his career.

According to the lawsuit, Mays worked as a bulldozer driver at Job Corps Cooking from 1963 until 1965, as flooring maker at E.L. Bruce from 1965 until 1967, as a wood paneling maker at Evans Products from 1967 until 1969 and as a chemical mixer and operator at Humko Chemical from 1969 until 1991. The complaint also claims Mays suffered secondary asbestos exposure through his father who was a laborer at Nikki Brothers.

Flake-Mays lawsuit claims the defendants should have known of the harmful effects of asbestos, but failed to exercise reasonable care and caution for the plaintiffs’ or their deceased relative’s safety.

As a result of his asbestos-related diseases, the lawsuit states Mays became disabled and disfigured, incurred medical costs and suffered great physical pain and mental anguish. Further, Mays became prevented from pursuing his normal course of employment and, as a result, lost large sums of money that would have accrued to him.

In her 10-count complaint, Flake-Mays is seeking a judgment of more than $150,000, economic damages of more than $200,000, punitive and exemplary damages of more than $50,000, compensatory damages of more than $100,000, punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish the defendants, plus costs and other relief the court deems just.

With Golf Cart Accidents on the Rise, how Stupid can you be in a Golf Cart?

May 6th, 2013. By AbiK

Apparently pretty stupid!

Given a top speed of around 15 miles per hour, golf carts aren’t exactly the speed racers that come to mind when you think about potentially dangerous accidents. But it’s that very image that can also create a false sense of safety for those who operate and/or ride in a golf cart.

Not all that long ago golf carts were simply that: carts used for playing golf. And they conjured up a speed demon image right up there with Fred Flintstone’s footmobile–only swapping out foot calluses for golf cleats. But with an increase in planned communities—particularly in Florida, California, Arizona, or Peachtree City, GA—as well as an increase in use on corporate and college campuses—golf carts have become more prevalent. And who ever imagined the day that homes would be built with custom golf cart garages?

Well, the increase in popularity has seemingly given way to an increase in golf cart injuries, too. According to an article in  Herald Tribune Golf (June, 2012), the American Journal of Preventive Medicine reported that injuries from being hit by or falling off of golf carts spiked 132 percent from 1990 to 2006. That translated to nearly 150,000 people, ranging in age from 2 months to 96 years, getting hurt in golf cart accidents over that time period.

Why the increase?

Let’s start with the fact that the golf cart is the new town cruiser—less work than a taking a bicycle; less of a pain than taking a car. But, unlike a car, in some states—Alabama, California, Iowa, Kansas, Rhode Island, and Vermont—the minimum age to sit behind the golf cart wheel is thirteen. In Florida, it’s fourteen. The rest of the states put the minimum age to drive a golf cart at fifteen. That’s not to say that a teen can’t be a responsible driver. But one only needs to take a look at the above video to understand how teen stupidity can contribute to a golf cart accident.

On the flip side, there’s no maximum driving age. Of course, it’s not like every state has an age limit—or even just a vision test—for older car drivers either. But it’s a safe bet that some elderly drivers should not be putting the pedal to the metal regardless of vehicle size or speed.

Unfortunately, golf cart accidents can lead to some pretty serious injuries—including death. A sharp turn, for example, can cause passengers to fall out leading to spinal injury, fracture or concussion. But even seemingly harmless behavior like hanging a leg out over the side of the golf cart or forgetting to put the brake in the locked position when getting out of the golf cart can lead to injury as well. And it goes without saying that once alcohol and/or drugs are involved, stupidity usually follows…

So now that golf cart season is actually all seasons, golf cart safety needs to become an all-season concern as well.

 

 

Asbestos News Roundup: 5.2.13 – Navy Vets and Asbestos Risk

May 2nd, 2013. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map.

US Navy Veterans at Risk for Asbestos

US Navy Veterans are at high risk for asbestos-related disease, due to their asbestos exposure while working on navy ships undergoing refits, for example. But because asbestos-related disease can take up to 30 years or more to manifest, it is often detected long after men have left the Navy.

The states with the most US Navy Veterans include California, Florida, New York, Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Arizona, Massachusetts, Washington, Maine, Oregon, Arizona, Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Montana, Kansas, North Dakota, Hawaii, Nebraska, and Mississippi.

US Navy Veterans are not the only group of workers at high risk for asbestos exposure. Men and women who worked in power plants, manufacturing factories, chemical plants, oil refineries, mines, smelters, aerospace manufacturing facilities, demolition construction work sites, railroads, automotive manufacturing facilities, or auto brake shops may also have been exposed to high levels of asbestos.

Asbestos Lawsuits

New Orleans, LA: several corporations are facing an asbestos mesothelioma lawsuit filed by a woman from St. Tammany Parish who alleges each company contributed to her contraction of the asbestos-related disease.

Sharon Laurent filed her asbestos lawsuit against CRS Limited, Eagle Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC and Taylor Seidenbach in the Orleans Parish Central District Court.

Laurent alleges that due to her household exposure to asbestos containing products manufactured by the defendants she contracted mesothelioma.

The defendants are accused of lack of warning or sufficient and timely warning of the hazards of their products would present on the course of the normal and intended use, lack of safety instructions to eliminate or reduce the health risk associated with the use of their products and failing to inspect products to assure sufficiency and adequacy of warnings and safety precautions.

An unspecified amount is sought for all medical expenses, loss earnings, mental suffering, physical pain and suffering and loss of quality of life. (LAreceord.com)

Asbestos Clean Up

Columbia, MO: Residents of an apartment building in Columbia, who lost everything in a fire that all but consumed the building, have now learned that the fire, clean-up and subsequent rains have triggered a safe level of asbestos in the building to become toxic, said Melissa DeCicco, the marketing manager for Mills Apartments, the St. Louis-based company that owns the complex.

DeCicco said the asbestos has made it dangerous for residents to take back most of their possessions. “Anything of sentimental value, the contractor will try and get back in and have them cleaned for free, but those are the only things that we can really get out,” she said.

None of the residents of the 66 apartments will be able to move back in for a long time, DeCicco said, though how long is unknown. She couldn’t say exactly how many residents were displaced. (columbiamissourian.com)

Asbestos News Roundup: 4.26.13 – Top Risk Jobs for Asbestos Exposure

April 26th, 2013. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map.

Asbestos Exposure—Who’s at Risk?

A $7.5 million asbestos lawsuit settlement was recently awarded to construction worker who developed a highly aggressive cancer after his exposure to asbestos. The plaintiff, who was not named, brought the lawsuit against several of the companies that manufactured the materials.

But construction workers aren’t the only people at high risk for asbestos disease. According to information posted by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), workers in the following areas can be exposed to asbestos:

• Brake repair mechanic

• Carpenter

• Demolition worker

• Dry wall finisher

• Electrician

• Insulation installer

• Miner

• Pipe or steam fitter

• Plumber

• Roofer

• Shipyard worker

• Vermiculite processing plant worker

• Welder

The ATSDR also states that outdoor workers, such as construction workers, landscapers, and excavators might be exposed to naturally occurring asbestos found above the ground through activities that crush asbestos-containing rock or stir up dust in soils that contain asbestos.

Asbestos Lawsuits

New Orleans, LA: Carol Phillips and the Estate of Robert Lee Phillips have filed an asbestos lawsuit against ABB Combustion Engineering Inc., Centerpoint Energy Inc., Associated Electric Cooperative Inc., Nebraska Public Power District, and City of Grand Island in St. John the Baptist District Court.

Mrs. Phillips alleges her husband died from asbestos exposure. He worked for the defendants for various times from 1956 until 1980, and, the lawsuit contends she was exposed, on numerous occasions, to asbestos or asbestos-containing products and inhaled great quantities of asbestos fibers. Phillips developed mesothelioma and subsequently died as a result of his alleged exposure, the lawsuit claims.

The asbestos lawsuit claims negligence and premises liability for failing to provide a safe place to work, failing to inspect, approve, and supervise the work of Philips and his co-workers, failing to provide adequate warnings, physical examinations, safety equipment, ventilation, and breathing apparatus to prevent Phillips from being harmed by exposure to asbestos, failing to comply with the applicable regulations regarding workplace exposure to asbestos, failing to provide adequate safety equipment, and failing to protect Phillips from any asbestos exposure, on the part of the defendants.

Mrs. Phillips is seeking an award of wrongful death and survival damages for physical pain and mental anguish, pain, medical expenses, physical impairment, total disability, loss of earning capacity and wages, expenses for domestic help and nursing care, loss of love and affection, loss of services, medical expenses, funeral expenses, attorney’s fees, interest, and court costs.

Los Angeles, CA: A construction worker who developed a highly aggressive cancer after his exposure to asbestos, has settled pre-trial for $7.5 million. The plaintiff brought his asbestos lawsuit against several of the companies that manufactured the asbestos-containing materials.

The plaintiff was a construction worker in the 1970s and ‘80s, helping install underground water and sewer lines beneath the Sacramento Valley city of Chico. His job involved working with pipes made from a concrete-asbestos compound, which he would cut with a gasoline-powered saw. The cutting generated an enormous amount of cement-asbestos dust, which left the plaintiff covered head to toe by the end of the day. The plaintiff was later diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma, an aggressive form of cancer, also rare except where attributable to asbestos exposure.

The plaintiff filed the lawsuit in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, seeking damages on a defective product liability action. The plaintiff sought recovery of medical expenses, lost wages, and non-economic recovery. The defendants named were several companies who manufactured, sold or delivered the asbestos-containing pipes the plaintiff worked with, including Parex USA, Westburne Supply, John K. Bice Co., Los Angeles Rubber, Hajoca Corp., Hanson Permanente Cement, Keenan, Properties, J-M Manufacturing, Certainteed Corp., Ferguson Enterprises, Grinnell Corp., Amcord, Ameron International and Calportland.

Asbestos Manufacturer Files for Bankruptcy

On Monday, April 22, 2013, Yarway Corporation filed a chapter 11 petition for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. According to papers filed by Yarway with the Bankruptcy Court, the company’s origins go back to 1908 when it started manufacturing pipe clamps, steam traps and valves. The company was privately owned until 1986, when it was sold to Keystone International, Inc. Keystone was purchased by Tyco International Ltd. in 1997.

According to its Declaration, Yarway “allegedly manufactured, distributed and/or sold asbestos-containing products, which ceased entirely by 1988.” The company stopped its manufacturing operations entirely in 2003 when it sold its manufacturing facility to an unrelated third party. Id. Even after the company sold off its manufacturing assets, it remained in existence in order to “defend, process and satisfy asbestos-related claims asserted against it.” These asbestos related claims are the basis for Yarway filing for bankruptcy.

Yarway contends that its bankruptcy filing is the result of the continued flow of asbestos-related claims due to human exposure to the company’s asbestos-containing products. The company places the asbestos claims in two primary categories: (1) claims stemming from exposure to Yarway’s gaskets and packing that was manufactured between the 1920s to the 1970; and (2) claims relating to the manufacture of joint packing consisting of Teflon and asbestos from the 1940s to the 1970s.

Yarway is faced with an enormous amount of asbestos-related litigation. The company contends that it was first named as a defendant in a lawsuit in 1991. In the last five years over 10,000 new asbestos-related claims have been asserted against the company. Since the beginning of Yarway’s fiscal year (October 1, 2012), Yarway has received over 1,000 new asbestos claims. In the past five years, Yarway has paid over $128 million in settlement costs for asbestos claims. That number reached $18 million for this fiscal year alone.

Yarway contends that in 2012 it settled the last of its insurance policies known to provide coverage for asbestos-related claims. The company believes it has no additional insurance coverage for future claims. By filing for bankruptcy, Yarway hopes to “negotiate, obtain approval of, and consummate a plan for reorganization that establishes an appropriately funded trust to provide for the fair and equitable payment of legitimate current and future Yarway asbestos claims …” (MondaqNews.com)