Is ‘Jesus Heals’ False Advertising When He Doesn’t?

May 7th, 2012. By AbiK

Cruising down I-95 a while back there was a billboard that simply said, “Jesus Saves”. No idea who sponsored it, though one would imagine it was a Christian organization of some sort. Regardless, as with most billboards, it was advertising something. In this case, Jesus. The come-on of course being that if you “buy” Jesus, He’ll seal the transaction by saving you (or your soul). But, what if He doesn’t? Is that false advertising?

Well, a recent Australian billboard took things a bit further by saying, “Jesus Heals Cancer” (see picture, photo by Paul Taylor, nzherald). The billboard also reportedly had a tally of those whom Jesus had apparently healed—a total of six cancer survivors. Glory be to God.

However, not everyone was happy with the Jesus Heals billboard—including an Australian family whose 3 year old son is undergoing treatment for leukemia. Their beef? The sign read like a factual statement—not a message of hope, and therefore, it’s misleading—and offensive.

Amen.

And one can only wonder had the 3 year old been old enough to read, how would mommy and daddy be expected to explain why Jesus hadn’t healed him yet? Were they not ‘good enough’ Christians (assuming, of course, that they’re Christians)? Why was he being ostracized from the healthy and the cleansed?

After the Australian Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received a total of nine such complaints, it launched an investigation into the matter. The result? The ASA deemed that while the sponsor of the ad did not have any intention to offend, it clearly did not display the ‘”due sense of social responsibility required” and therefore breached the code of ethics.’ (nzherald.co.nz)

Unfortunately, most of us know someone who—even with ‘taking the narrow path’ in life—has succumbed to cancer. And most practicing Christians certainly believe that while God is omnipotent, there is only so much He can, or will, do—leaving us mere mortals to find solace in platitudes like “God must have needed him/her in heaven”. What else is there to say, after all?

The billboard in Australia was the work of the Equippers Church—their tagline: “Equipping People for Life through Faith in Jesus Christ”. Here’s an excerpt from one of their web pages (boldface added by author):

Equippers exists to create an environment where young and old of every culture can easily connect and discover the purpose of their existence. We value the different cultures that make up our community, however we also believe in the importance in having the same spirit in all our expressions. We encourage everyone to put the culture of the Kingdom ahead of their own cultural expectations, as we become united in the same purpose, the cause of Christ.

We believe that the Bible is inspired by God—that it is accurate authoritative and applicable to every part of our lives. Our desire is to communicate the message of God’s word without compromise in a relevant, life-giving way.

Draw your own conclusions from the above, but one word comes to mind: fundamentalist. To round out your picture of the Equippers Church, a few applicable keywords might be: Christian contemporary music, missions, ministries, Hallelujah Project, Shout Conference. You get the vibe. Unfortunately, the vibe tends to call for drinking the proverbial kool-aid and encouraging others to partaketh of the cup as well. Even if it means buying a billboard to proselytize the weak into thinking they’ll be ‘healed’.

To their credit, they do practice what they preach and do so with apparent conviction—case in point, here’s an example from Senior Pastor Kathy Monk’s twitter stream:

Choose to do life with Jesus, the other alternative is ridiculous, stupid & deadly…#JustDoIt

Deadly? Stupid?

Wouldn’t that be a nice message for a cancer patient right now—yes, Jesus heals cancer—but wait there’s more!—an addendum that didn’t make it onto the billboard: to NOT follow Jesus is deadly! And guess what? If you don’t follow Him, you’re stupid, too! Christianity at it’s most ‘Christian’ there, right? Thankfully not the Christianity I grew up with (for the record, I’m Christian born and bred.)

So yes, clearer minds prevailed on this one. The sign was apparently updated to read: “Jesus Heals every Sickness & Every Disease – Matthew 4:23”. Which, from a false advertising perspective is just fine. After all, when you’re trying to promote what’s in essence a best-selling book and its book club, what better to use than a pull quote?

Asbestos News Roundup: 5.3.12 – Construction Worker Asbestos

May 4th, 2012. By LucyC

A roundup of recent asbestos-related news and information that you should be aware of. An ongoing list of reported asbestos hot spots in the US from the Asbestos News Roundup archive appears on our asbestos map.

Construction Worker Asbestos Disease Risk

It seems that that by far the majority of asbestos lawsuits we see involve construction work, in some capacity. Many of the materials used in the construction industry contained, or in some cases still contain asbestos. In fact, by the mid-20th century asbestos was being used in fire retardant coatings, concrete, bricks, pipes and fireplace cement, heat, fire, and acid resistant gaskets, pipe insulation, ceiling insulation, fireproof drywall, flooring, roofing, lawn furniture, and drywall joint compound.

Unfortunately, In the 1960/70s the general public was not aware of the dangers of asbestos, and so millions of men and women likely worked on or around construction asbestos without any protection.

It would not be uncommon for people to work with asbestos-containing products, either installing or removing them, which would send asbestos fibers into the air. The fibers are inhaled, and settle on people’s clothing—and that’s how asbestos disease begins. People who become ill from asbestos are usually exposed to it on a regular basis, hence the hundreds of asbestos contruction lawsuits we are seeing now.

Asbestos Lawsuits

A total of 18 new asbestos lawsuits were recently filed in St. Louis Circuit Court. Last week we highlighted several, and this week we bring you a few more.

Madison County, IL: David L. and Judith Hall of Colorado allege David L. Hall developed mesothelioma after his work as a mechanic, a construction worker, and a home remodeler, in Colorado, Kansas and Washington during the 1960s and 1970s.

Nolan and Essie Madere have filed an asbestos lawsuit as a result of Nolan Madere having developed lung cancer after his work as an airborne paratrooper from 1947 until 1952, as a laborer at Shell Oil Company from 1954 until 1965 and as a maintenance mechanic at Kaiser Aluminum from 1965 until 1992.

Lawrence Hull claims he developed mesothelioma after his work as a laborer, bond office clerk, teacher and clerk at various locations throughout North Dakota, California, Oregon and Idaho from 1941 until 1995. (madisonrecord.com)

Asbestos Settlements

San Francisco, CA: A $4.5 million punitive damages award in an asbestos lawsuit will be allowed to stand—a California appeals court has ruled that it is not excessive, and that the conduct of ArvinMeritor, the defendant in the lawsuit, and successor of brake shoe manufacturer Rockwell, was “highly reprehensible.”

According to a report by Legal NewsLine, the brake shoes Rockwell made were fitted with asbestos-containing linings produced by other companies. ArvinMeritor did not dispute its liability for the acts of Rockwell.

“By the 1960s, ArvinMeritor knew that workers exposed to asbestos dust were at risk of developing asbestos-related diseases,” the judge presiding over the appeal wrote. “Indeed, in 1973 and again in 1975, it wrote letters to (Pneumo Abex) and other manufacturers complaining about the presence of asbestos dust in the brake linings it was receiving from them. Nonetheless, ArvinMeritor did not place any warnings on its products until the early 1980s, and continued to market asbestos-containing brakes until its inventory of them was exhausted sometime in the early 1990s.”

The justice noted that ArvinMeritor did not include a specific reference to cancer on its products until 1987. Gordon Bankhead, who filed the lawsuit, had worked at automotive maintenance facilities from 1965-1999. He died of mesothelioma in 2009.

A jury found ArvinMeritor 15 percent at fault for Bankhead’s death and suffering, putting it on the hook for $375,000 of a $2.5 million noneconomic damages award. The company was joint and severally liable for all of the $1.47 million in compensatory damages. A separate trial resulted in the $4.5 million punitive damages award. (Legal Newsline.com)

CarFax Consumer Fraud? You be the Judge

May 3rd, 2012. By AbiK

This kind of thing can really tick a person off—when a website does a bait and switch with you. Check out CarFax—the ‘vehicle history reports’ website. Folks go to CarFax with pretty much one purpose in mind—to look up a car’s VIN number (the Vehicle Identification Number) in order to find out the car’s repair history—or what problems that particular car might have. Here’s the CarFax homepage:

You’ll note—how can you not?—the khaki-clad Car Fox inviting you to do a “Free Vehicle Search”. Talk about a wolf (ok, a fox) in sheep’s clothing. No asterisks. No disclaimers. Just a couple of fields that you can input either a car’s VIN number or the license plate number and state where it’s registered and…bingo!…you should get some car info. For free, right?

No, not right. Here’s what you get on the next screen:

Want any actual information about the car—it’ll cost you $34.99. See it’s a “vehicle” search—not a “vehicle information” search.

Now, I knew this already—trying to get a vehicle history report online for free is like trying to get blood from a stone. But at least on sites like Vin Central you get a portion of the history report and then there is a fee if you want the whole report. The key, however, is that Vin Central never says or implies upfront that you’ll get anything for free. So with Vin Central, you at least feel that the company hasn’t tried to bamboozle you.

But CarFax? When it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck…and this duck looks and walks like false advertising. And sadly, just a quick search on LawyersandSettlements.com shows that CarFax false advertising complaints are not new.

If you scroll to the very bottom of the CarFax homepage, to the list of links there, you’ll see “FREE SERVICES”. And yes, you can find out whether a car has been identified as a lemon or not. For free. You can also conduct a CarFax “Record Check”—which, ironically, is basically the same thing as the “Free Vehicle Search” above—you get a “search” but no “search results“. The Record Check tells you how many records have been found and then if you want to actually see those records, well, you need to hand over that $34.99. But at least you know you were only supposed to get a record check—not necessarily the records AND the information found in those records.

So is this CarFax consumer fraud? It certainly looks like a bait and switch to me, but you be the judge.

Monday Minute 4.30: Legal News, Lawsuit & Settlements You Might’ve Missed

May 1st, 2012. By AbiK

Lots in legal news headlines from the past week that you might’ve missed including our weekly Asbestos News column and Week Adjourned—the weekly wrap of top class action lawsuits and settlements.

This week we heard about the Bumble Bee Tuna class action lawsuit (over false advertising claims) as well as the Vita Coco false advertising settlement. Big news with type 2 diabetes drug Actos as well–is it time for round #2 with Actos lawsuits? Find more in our Monday Minute update…

 

Publix Unpaid Overtime Class Action: What is Chinese Overtime?

May 1st, 2012. By AbiK

Chinese what? Ok, you’ve probably heard of Chinese water torture. And Chinese New Year. And Chinese take-out (personal fave). But Chinese Overtime?

Yes, Chinese Overtime. If you’re in a job in which the work hours tend to fluctuate each week and you get overtime pay, then you may have heard it referred to as either variable workweek overtime pay or half-time overtime pay.

The department managers and assistment managers who make up the class in the Publix managers unpaid overtime class action lawsuit probably don’t care what the heck it’s called—they just believe they’re getting screwed out of pay. And, if you understand how Chinese overtime works, they’re kind of right.

So here goes: a Chinese overtime primer for those who haven’t had the pleasure of being paid this way…

In some jobs, the hours tend to fluctuate each week. Busier weeks call for longer hours; quiet weeks call for shorter hours. Many times when a job’s hours fluctuate, an employer will pay salaries based on a fixed salary for those fluctuating weeks. So the base salary—the straight-time pay—is the same each week even though the hours may in fact fluctuate.

The upside is that when there isn’t much work, the worker gets paid the set straight-time amount. Sort of a mini-coup for the worker, right?—work less, get paid the same.

The downside, however…well, let’s just say the Publix managers have been living more of the downside (allegedly) than the upside and that’s why they’ve filed the Publix class action lawsuit.

Here’s an example of how it would work–it’s tricky so try to hang with me. Say you’re paid $200 a week as your fixed salary. So regardless of whether you work 22 hours or you work 46 hours that week, you’re getting paid $200 for the week. However, if you worked the 46 hours, you’ve worked overtime and should get overtime pay. And this is where it gets tricky..

See, because you were ALREADY PAID straight time pay for those six hours according to how your pay is calculated (i.e., you get a fixed salary no matter how many hours you work), you won’t get time-and-a-half pay for your overtime hours. Those six hours are paid at only HALF your regular rate–which in management’s eyes is time-and-a-half because they’ve already paid you your fixed salary for those six overtime hours.

Nice deal, eh? Hell yeah for the employers–not so for the employees.