Darvon is over 50 years old—long enough to do some serious damage. Reports of adverse events, such as destroying people’s lives, were pouring in since 1979—back in the day when Ralph Nader was banging on FDA’s door to ban the painkiller, when Darvon was cited in 589 overdose deaths in 23 US cities. Nader’s Health Research Group called Darvon the “deadliest prescription drug in the United States” and Sidney Wolfe, M.D., director of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, said “Propoxyphene [Darvon] has one of the worst benefit-to-risk ratios I have ever seen for a drug,” yet the FDA did nothing.
What took the feds so long to recall Darvon and its evil cousin Darvocet? Rather than a recall, FDA just required that the manufacturer conduct an “educational campaign” to limit Darvon’s use. As if that would do any good: pharmaceutical companies aren’t educators, they are profiteers. Why didn’t the FDA slap a black box warning on the drug in ’79? I wonder if any of those decision-makers have any pangs of guilt, knowing how many OD’s they could have prevented. And now Darvon side effects have become as serious as a heart attack.
It wasn’t until a recent study confirmed that Darvon and Darvocet were associated with heart problems that the meds were yanked from North America’s shelves (the UK and other countries were way ahead—the UK started withdrawing Darvon in 2005 and again in 2009).
I think that one reason the FDA sat on it laurels for so long was because up until a few years ago, most people were prescribed Darvon for depression and overdoses were regarded as accidental suicides. Nothing wrong with the drug, just the patient. Then it become popular as a pain killer; so popular that by 2009, 10 million people had been prescribed some form of Propoxyphene, either Darvon or Darvocet.
Guaranteed there will be a lot of lawsuits now. And perhaps those families who lost a loved one to an “accidental overdose” (like victims of the Fentanyl Patch) will also come forward.
Dear Sirs,
We want to add to this text that we have studied the painkilling substance propoxyphene (DXP) since 1993. Now FDA says that ONE NEW STUDY made them stop Darvon. We have informed FDA about our research since 1999-2000, they know about our 9-10 scientific articles about the substance, we also wrote two doctorial dissertations (2000 and 2001) in Sweden.
Our research was behind the decision in UK, Sweden and The European Union (EU) to stop the drug. Go to this link,
http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/3/159.2.full
Our references are nrs 21-26
Ulf Jonasson, Doctor of Public Health
Birgitta Jonasson, PhD
Search Jonasson+Propoxyphene
Go to YouTube, Darvon, Distalgeic and Co-Proxamol. The worst drugs ever
youtube.com/watch?v=q92lL4kM-JE
PS. We have been in contact some yeaes ago. You know we started our research 1993
I took Darvocet for quite a few years.
Hi Sue, did you experience any negative side effects from taking Darvocet?
While on Darvocet I was very depressed and was taking up to 3 times recommended dosage. I wanted to kill myself but everytime I tried my family would walk in the room before I could take a handful of pills.
Hi Chris, We've been hearing a lot of similar stories about Darvocet since both Darvon & Darvocet were officially pulled off the market. I'm not sure why you were taking up to 3x the recommended dosage–were you told to do that? Regardless, even with the recommended dosages, there were clearly some bad Darvocet side effects. Given that and given your experience, it may be worth it to submit a claim for a lawyer who specializes in Darvocet lawsuits to review–you can do that (for free) by filling out the form here and submitting it.
My dad took one dose of Darvocet in 1976. Within a half hour he was hallucinating and went into a coma. He died a few days later, the death certificate said congestive heart failure. The drug was just recently pulled from the market and proven to cause these kinds of deaths, is it too late to file a law suit in California where he died?
Hi Janice, I'm sorry to hear about the story of your father–and considering the time that has since passed, and the fact that the memory of what he had taken (Darvocet) and that of the subsequent chain of events are still vividly with you, it was undoubtedly a very unexpected and emotionally upsetting time. I saw you also submitted a claim–and that's exactly the thing to do to find out if perhaps you might be able to file a Darvocet lawsuit. Only a lawyer who specializes in Darvon and Darvocet litigation can best review your details and make a determination as to whether you might have a lawsuit.