New research suggests that timely follow-up care is not always forthcoming—even in spite of the availability of advanced, computerized medical-record systems that feature alerts as a way to further guarantee timely response.
Not so, according to the authors of a study appearing late last month in the Archives of Internal Medicine.
"Our findings suggest that an electronic medical record that facilitates transmission and availability of critical imaging results to the health care provider through either automated notification or direct access of primary report does not eliminate the problem of missed test results even when one or more health care providers read the results," write the authors of a study in the Sept. 28 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.
According to a news release from the American Medical Association, researchers established alert notifications to let doctors know about abnormal test results at a Department of Veterans Affairs facility. They checked to see whether the doctors followed up with the patients.
Doctors failed to follow up in a timely fashion on nearly 8 percent of the alerts that showed signs of possible problems.
According to the authors, communication breakdowns are blamed in cases when doctors don't follow-up on abnormal test results. In some cases, all the doctors involved in a patient's care don't receive information about a lung mass, for example.
READ MORE MRI HEALTH RISK LEGAL NEWS
The authors of the study are calling for more effective systems to ensure doctors pay better attention to abnormal test results. Taking that recommendation one step further, it's important for doctors to have a thorough working knowledge of a patient's pre-existing deficiencies, such as weak or diseased kidneys, before prescribing a gadolinium-based contrasting agent for MRI. In such cases, kidney dialysis immediately following the MRI is prudent.