In the study, researchers dug into the records and medical histories of workers who toiled at 4 textile plants, located in North Carolina that produced various products using chrysotile asbestos—the most commonly-used form of asbestos in the industrial age.
In a study that can only be described as exhaustive 5,770 workers were scrutinized over a 23-year period beginning with 1950 and ending with 1973.
The results are stunning. Slightly less than half of all the workers died during the study period. Of the more than 2500 workers who died prior to 1973, 277 of those workers succumbed to lung cancer—and the rate of lung cancer was an incredible 95 percent higher for the plant workers than that of the general population.
The risk for mesothelioma was also a lot higher. If the forgoing didn't stalk and catch the unsuspecting workers, there were plenty other risk factors associated with asbestos exposure. Among them, cancers of the larynx and rectum, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma.
It has long been held that the risk of asbestos cancer increases with the length of asbestos exposure over time. This study bears that out, finding that those workers who had been employed at the textile plant for 20 years or longer faced the highest risk for lung cancer.
As noted in previous studies as well as case histories, the risk of asbestos cancer was higher in association with elapsed time since asbestos exposure, given the view that it often takes decades for various asbestos cancer symptoms, including asbestos mesothelioma to appear.
What is significant about this study is the confidence researchers project with regard to the findings. This is telling because past studies, while never suggesting that asbestos doesn't cause cancer, nonetheless raised some questions with regard to the risks associated with different forms of asbestos. Amosite and crocidolite, for example are two lesser-used derivatives of asbestos while chrysotile is the most commonly used.
Previous research did not achieve a clear link between chrysotile asbestos and mesothelioma, according to Dana Loomis, PhD, Professor in the School of Community Health Sciences at the University of Nevada and the lead author of the current study.
This study leaves little doubt that chrysotile asbestos is a killer. "Our findings support the conclusion that chrysotile is carcinogenic to humans and that it should continue to be regulated like other forms of asbestos," Dr. Loomis says. "The data do not provide any support for proposals that chrysotile is safe for wider use. This conclusion is especially relevant for developing countries where strong regulations on asbestos have not been established."
The current study was able to prove, beyond any doubt the link between chrysotile asbestos fibers and mesothelioma, together with lung cancer thanks to the access researchers had to large numbers of exposed workers, plant exposure data and medicinal histories.
While asbestos has been banned outright in several countries around the world, the US is yet to take that final step. While asbestos is no longer used in the manufacture of most products, it is still common in certain industrial sectors, including the manufacture of brake linings and other automotive parts. Various times in recent history bills have floated through congress attempting a total ban on asbestos, but have always failed due to a still-strong pro-asbestos lobby.
READ MORE ASBESTOS LEGAL NEWS
Even with the use of asbestos in manufacturing on the decline, it's still out there—in the walls, above the ceilings and wrapped around the pipes of countless buildings. When asbestos removal is required, workers together with the greater public need to be protected from floating asbestos fibers.
In summary, the risk is still a concern and the science confirming that risk has never been more dramatic, or conclusive. That's where the legal system and your opportunity for potential compensation come in. If you, or a loved one have been touched by asbestos cancer or asbestos mesothelioma stemming from asbestos exposure—even going back decades—get in touch with an asbestos attorney right away.
You may have little time to lose.
READER COMMENTS
jim nashwinter
on
Ron
on
Bruce Wilkie
on
As a kid I frequently (near daily) played in the nearby fields. I ate wild strawberries found there as well as apples and pears. I fell in white mud. I swam in the river(after discharge stopped) downstream from there.
The plant is gone, the main field fenced off with hazardous area warning signs. The area around the old plant (torn down some time ago)still has an odor I recognize.
Coincidence I have multiple myeloma? Coincidence a neighbor of my Dad has multiple myeloma...she's my age and lives in house she grew up in which is even more in line with prevailing winds and the old smoke stacks.
Robert Miller
on
Joseph salter
on
God Bless and I hope to hear from someone
Joe
Geneva Williams
on
I have Multiple Myeloma and I cannot find anybody that will help me.We would hang decorations between the large ceiling tiles with paper clips and string every holiday or some special day,Lots of times I had dust fall in my face,I had cancer in my right nostril.
Why does all the things I read,it doesn't mention that I have Multiple Myeloma (Bone Marrow Cancer) and it was caused by the Asbestos I was exposed to.
There wer 9 other employees that died from different types of cancer.Please will someone help me .I have suffered for 17 years ,I was in remission for four years but it came back.Sure,I know you will say It's too long ago.If I had been told the real truth,maybe I would not have suffered so much and my friends would not have died.Then I ask what caused their cancer?
I had writen one of the County Comissioners and told him about the Asbestos,The response I received was completely disregarding what I had told him.I wish i would have kept his e.mail.
Regina Goodwin
on