One lawsuit, which seeks class action status, alleges that Sprint Fidelis Leads caused the death of at least five people. Plaintiffs seek five million dollars for each member of the class. One of the plaintiffs named in the lawsuit is Ted Carter, who has a Medtronic defibrillator implanted along with Sprint Fidelis Leads. The suit alleges that the lead presents "a serious ongoing health risk due to its defective design and manufacture." Plaintiffs further allege that Medtronic knew about the dangers associated with its leads but failed to warn consumers about those risks. They seek compensation for negligence, breach of implied warranty of merchandise and medical monitoring.
Meanwhile, a lawsuit seeking class action status was filed in Bismarck federal court against Medtronic. The suit alleges negligence and emotional distress and seeks restitution and medical monitoring. The plaintiff has not yet been harmed physically by her Sprint Fidelis Leads, but argues that having the leads inside her is like living with a "ticking time bomb."
Although many lawsuits against medical device companies are filed by people who have been in some way injured by defective devices, more lawsuits are springing up in which patients have potentially defective devices implanted that have not yet malfunctioned. The lawsuits reflect the enormous stress and anxiety that these patients face—they know they have a device that could potentially malfunction at any time without warning, causing life-threatening injury. That in itself can cause a lot of stress for patients. They worry and wonder when and if their device will malfunction and what impact the malfunction will have on their lives.
In the case of Sprint Fidelis Leads, the device could malfunction in one of two ways: It can either fail to deliver a necessary, life-saving shock or it can prompt the defibrillator to administer a series of painful and life-threatening shocks when they are not needed.
Furthermore, patients cannot have the leads removed because explanting the devices is considered a risky surgery. The most they can do is have the leads capped and have other leads put in. However, this also requires further surgery and there are only so many routes that doctors can take to implant leads, as [one patient] knows well.
READ MORE LEGAL NEWS
Many lawsuits have been filed against Medtronic on behalf of patients who have already been injured by defective Sprint Fidelis Leads and those who have not been injured but are concerned that they may be in the future. Some patients who have not yet had their Sprint Fidelis Leads fracture will likely experience such an event in the future. As many as 2.3 percent of leads may fracture within 30 months of implantation; how that number increases beyond 30 months is not yet known.
READER COMMENTS
Laura Bailey
on