Employers should realize by now that they cannot misclassify employees as exempt in an attempt to avoid overtime compensation. Several stock and security workers filed a lawsuit against the retailer Scoop NY, claiming they were promoted to manager positions but the content of their work did not change significantly with these promotions. In fact the only difference was that as managers and assistant managers, they were given a salary instead of the hourly wages they had initially been paid. And they were putting in a lot of unpaid overtime. "They used me," said a former employee. "That was just a name, to say I was a manager." As well, they were seldom given breaks during frequent 12-hour days.
And in January, 2009, Khan aka Dominic Kudo a general manager at one of 1,200 Panda Express restaurants filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of all managers nationwide to recover unpaid overtime. Khan alleges Panda Express deliberately schemed to misclassify its workers as "exempt" employees, so as to avoid paying overtime for the long hours of non-managerial, non-exempt tasks that it required its general managers to work.
READ MORE OVERTIME LEGAL NEWS
When will employers learn they can't get away with misclassifying their employees to cut costs? Perhaps the 250 new field investigators added to the Department of Labor's (DOL) Wage and Hour Division will help. According to the DOL, wage-and-hour labor litigation continues to increase exponentially. Federal class actions brought under the FLSA outnumbered all other types of private class actions in employment-related cases, to the tune of $252.7 million paid out in settlements in 2008.
It might be a good time for employers to review their overtime pay policy and double-check the FLSA exempt employees' status.