LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
Cormet Hip Resurfacing System Risks
Washington, DC: Stryker Orthopaedics, the company that distributes the Corin Group's Cormet Hip Resurfacing System in the US, said in July that it will no longer be distributing the product as "distribution of a hip resurfacing device no longer fits within Stryker's long-term product strategy."
The Cormet Hip Resurfacing System was approved by the FDA in 2007. The system uses metal on metal, a strategy that has proven problematic for patients since coming to market. The system caps the femoral head with a metal head, which is then fitted into a metal cup placed within the hip socket.
While the Cormet Hip Resurfacing System is designed to mimic the functions of the biologic hip, and works in the same way, friction caused by the two metal surfaces rubbing against each other poses risk for cobalt poisoning, metallosis, and flaking. If metal debris is generated from the rubbing of the false joint, it puts the entire hip replacement at risk and can cause loosening, dislocation and risk for fracture.
Hip resurfacing was introduced in the late 1990s as an alternative to the more conventional total hip replacement. It is mainly designed for middle-aged patients who are physically active and expected to outlive the l 15-20 year lifespan of a full hip replacement. However, a British study by The Royal College of Surgeons (September 2008) found about 4 percent of the 2,360 women who underwent resurfacing in England had to have a second operation to repair the same hip within three years. Those women who received traditional hip replacements had a re-operation rate of less than 1.6 percent. Hip replacement lawyers predict that hundreds or even thousands of patients are now facing hip revision surgery, or multiple revision surgeries.
Published on Sep-8-11
The Cormet Hip Resurfacing System was approved by the FDA in 2007. The system uses metal on metal, a strategy that has proven problematic for patients since coming to market. The system caps the femoral head with a metal head, which is then fitted into a metal cup placed within the hip socket.
While the Cormet Hip Resurfacing System is designed to mimic the functions of the biologic hip, and works in the same way, friction caused by the two metal surfaces rubbing against each other poses risk for cobalt poisoning, metallosis, and flaking. If metal debris is generated from the rubbing of the false joint, it puts the entire hip replacement at risk and can cause loosening, dislocation and risk for fracture.
Hip resurfacing was introduced in the late 1990s as an alternative to the more conventional total hip replacement. It is mainly designed for middle-aged patients who are physically active and expected to outlive the l 15-20 year lifespan of a full hip replacement. However, a British study by The Royal College of Surgeons (September 2008) found about 4 percent of the 2,360 women who underwent resurfacing in England had to have a second operation to repair the same hip within three years. Those women who received traditional hip replacements had a re-operation rate of less than 1.6 percent. Hip replacement lawyers predict that hundreds or even thousands of patients are now facing hip revision surgery, or multiple revision surgeries.
Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered illness or adverse health in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.Published on Sep-8-11
LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
Medical Device Lawsuit Pitted One Manufacturer Against Another
October 20, 2012
It is somewhat ironic that a company itself having faced allegations of defective medical devices, has litigated against a rival citing an allegedly defective product. Given the spike in complaints over hip & knee replacement implant failure, such an allegation is nothing new, save for the twist that saw the complaint stem from a competitor. READ MORE
READ MORE Defective Hip Implant Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Defective Products Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Drugs/Medical Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Defective Products Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Drugs/Medical Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READER COMMENTS
Ray Kelly
on
michael gorsky
on
Carla Marchant
on
Gregory Dugay
on
Then he neglected to sew my gluteus medius back to it's attachment at the hip so it formed a little ball of pain down near my trochanter. When I went to see him about it, he said that it was normal!
I'm struggling to decide who is more negligent, ... Corin Co. or my surgeon, Rick Gehlert at UNM Hospital in Albuquerque. We leads me to think that the deeper is that Capitalism simply brings the worst out in people.
Anonymous
on
In April of 2011, after many injections into the hip and an MRI that showed "atrophy" of the muscles surrounding the area, I decided to seek a second opinion. The new doctor listened to my symptoms and told me that I needed to have the MoM hip removed as it was causing the issue, which I agreed.
I continue to live in pain due to the damage caused by the metal and have been declined by a dozen or so lawyers because this product had 'pre-market approval'. I need someone to help me find a lawyer who is willing to take on this case as I am not the only person who has suffered from this product and we should have rights even though the FDA gave it the thumbs up!