LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
FDA Warns Against Laparoscopic Power Morcellation
Read our Laparoscopic Power Morcellation FAQ
Were you looking for Operating Room Equipment Injury Lawsuits lawsuits?
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a safety communication warning against the use of laparoscopic power morcellation for laparoscopic uterine surgery, including hysterectomy or myomectomy (uterine fibroid removal). Of concern are reports of the spread of unsuspected cancerous tissue specifically, uterine sarcoma during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Laparoscopic power morcellation lawsuits have now been filed by women alleging they were harmed by the use of a power morcellator during laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Laparoscopic uterine surgery via power morcellator has been marketed as a non-invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy. The surgery is used in women who are undergoing a hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Power morcellation is a procedure that uses a medical device to break the uterine tissue into smaller pieces so it can be removed through a small incision in the patient's abdomen. Uterine fibroids are typically non-cancerous growths in the uterus that do not generally cause health problems but can cause pelvic pressure, pain and prolonged menstrual bleeding.
Power Morcellation has been used as a replacement for traditional surgery because the smaller incision puts the patient at less risk of blood loss and infection and generally has a shorter recovery time.
In 2014 the FDA issued a safety communication on power morcellators and recommended that manufacturers add a boxed warning to device labels. The agency also warned that the "vast majority" of women undergoing removal of the uterus (hysterectomy) or fibroids (myomectomy) should not have surgery that involves the use of a power morcellator.
However, a Feb. 2017 report issued by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed that the FDA already knew of the potential risk for laparoscopic power morcellators to spread cancer 22 years before issuing its 2014 warning.
According the GAO report, the FDA "was aware of the potential for power morcellators to spread tissue (cancerous and noncancerous) when the agency cleared the first device in 1991" but believed there was a low risk of unsuspected cancers that could spread.
In July 2014, Johnson & Johnson sent a letter to medical care providers as part of that company's worldwide voluntary market withdrawal of all Ethicon Morcellation Devices. In its letter, Johnson & Johnson noted, "the risk-benefit assessment associated with the use of these devices in hysterectomy and myomectomy procedures for removing fibroids remains uncertain."
Lawsuits have now been filed against the makers of some power morcellation devices, alleging women were harmed by the use of the devices. The lawsuits allege the use of a morcellator device resulted in an aggressive cancer—leiomyosarcoma—spreading throughout the patient's body. The lawsuit alleges that Ethicon—a division of Johnson & Johnson—knew or should have known about the risk of a morcellation device spreading cancer in the patient's body, but failed to warn about that risk.
Last updated on
FREE LAPAROSCOPIC POWER MORCELLATION LAWSUIT EVALUATION
Send your Laparoscopic Power Morcellation claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
Laparoscopic Power Morcellation
Power Morcellation has been used as a replacement for traditional surgery because the smaller incision puts the patient at less risk of blood loss and infection and generally has a shorter recovery time.
FDA Power Morcellation Warning
However, a Feb. 2017 report issued by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed that the FDA already knew of the potential risk for laparoscopic power morcellators to spread cancer 22 years before issuing its 2014 warning.
According the GAO report, the FDA "was aware of the potential for power morcellators to spread tissue (cancerous and noncancerous) when the agency cleared the first device in 1991" but believed there was a low risk of unsuspected cancers that could spread.
Power Morcellation Devices:
- Ethicon Gynecare Morcellex Tissue Morcellator
- Morcellex Sigma Tissue Morcellator System
- Gynecare X-Tract Tissue Morcellator
In July 2014, Johnson & Johnson sent a letter to medical care providers as part of that company's worldwide voluntary market withdrawal of all Ethicon Morcellation Devices. In its letter, Johnson & Johnson noted, "the risk-benefit assessment associated with the use of these devices in hysterectomy and myomectomy procedures for removing fibroids remains uncertain."
Power Morcellation Lawsuits
Power Morcellation Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.Last updated on
LAPAROSCOPIC POWER MORCELLATION LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
Don't Use Ultrasonic Aspirators to Remove Uterine Fibroids FDA States
Power Morcellation Cancer Warning One Year Too Late for Doctor
:Washington, DC: Dr. Amy Reed, a physician and mother of six had surgery for uterine fibroids with a power morcelletor one year before the FDA first warned about the risk of power morcellators spreading cancer. Dr. Reed died from cancer in May—she was 44 years old.
The power morcellator had scattered malignant cancer cells inside Dr. Reed’s abdomen during surgery, which left her with advanced, Stage 4 cancer. After her surgery, a biopsy found that she had leiomyosarcoma, an aggressive type of cancer, and only then was she and her husband, surgeon Dr. Noorchashm told that a power morcellator was used to slice up her uterus, reported the New York Times (May 24, 2017).
Horrifically ironic, Dr. Reed and Dr. Noorchashm advocated against the power morcellation procedure for four years, which led to theFDA warning in 2014 against the use of laparoscopic morcellators to treat uterine fibroids. One year later, the agency was looking into whether on not Johnson & Johnson – the largest manufacturer of the device—knew about the risk of spreading cancer before pulling its power morcellator off the market. But other manufacturers did not follow suit. The power morcellator is a big seller for several medical device companies: according to the FDA, at least 50,000 women in the US undergo a hysterectomy — removal of the uterus—every year.
Incredibly, the power morcellator was approved by the FDA’s 501(k) fast -track process, meaning it didn’t undergo any human clinical trials, despite that agency estimating that 1 in 350 U.S. women who undergo fibroid procedures each year have a form of cancer called uterine sarcoma.
After going public about the power morcellator’s hazards and calling for a complete ban of the device, Dr. Reed and her husband were ostracized both by the hospital where she had the surgery and many gynecologists who favored the device. According to The Times, when Dr. Reed returned to Brigham and Women’s for a medical procedure, she and Dr. Noorchashm “were stunned to find that the hospital had assigned a guard to inspect their bags and escort them at all times, for security reasons. Dr. Noorchashm called a lawyer. A judge put a stop to the escort, issuing a restraining order against the hospital.”
This action by the hospital and the gynecology profession begs the question: are they receiving perks from power morcellation manufacturers? It wouldn’t be the first time that doctors were bribed by drug companies to increase sales, and even sit on their advisory committees…
READ MORE
Olympus Settles Four Power Morcellator Lawsuits
October 31, 2017
Washington, DC: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has provided the medical community with guidance on the use of ultrasonic surgical aspirators. Specifically, the agency is advising companies that make the devices to label them as contraindicated for the removal of uterine fibroids. The non-binding guidance from the agency serves to strengthen its recent warnings about the use of power morcellators to remove uterine fibroids. READ MORE
Power Morcellation Cancer Warning One Year Too Late for Doctor
July 10, 2017
:Washington, DC: Dr. Amy Reed, a physician and mother of six had surgery for uterine fibroids with a power morcelletor one year before the FDA first warned about the risk of power morcellators spreading cancer. Dr. Reed died from cancer in May—she was 44 years old.
The power morcellator had scattered malignant cancer cells inside Dr. Reed’s abdomen during surgery, which left her with advanced, Stage 4 cancer. After her surgery, a biopsy found that she had leiomyosarcoma, an aggressive type of cancer, and only then was she and her husband, surgeon Dr. Noorchashm told that a power morcellator was used to slice up her uterus, reported the New York Times (May 24, 2017).
Horrifically ironic, Dr. Reed and Dr. Noorchashm advocated against the power morcellation procedure for four years, which led to the
Incredibly, the power morcellator was approved by the FDA’s 501(k) fast -track process, meaning it didn’t undergo any human clinical trials, despite that agency estimating that 1 in 350 U.S. women who undergo fibroid procedures each year have a form of cancer called uterine sarcoma.
After going public about the power morcellator’s hazards and calling for a complete ban of the device, Dr. Reed and her husband were ostracized both by the hospital where she had the surgery and many gynecologists who favored the device. According to The Times, when Dr. Reed returned to Brigham and Women’s for a medical procedure, she and Dr. Noorchashm “were stunned to find that the hospital had assigned a guard to inspect their bags and escort them at all times, for security reasons. Dr. Noorchashm called a lawyer. A judge put a stop to the escort, issuing a restraining order against the hospital.”
This action by the hospital and the gynecology profession begs the question: are they receiving perks from power morcellation manufacturers? It wouldn’t be the first time that doctors were bribed by drug companies to increase sales, and even sit on their advisory committees…
READ MORE
Olympus Settles Four Power Morcellator Lawsuits
June 18, 2017
Upper Saucon Township, PA: Olympus Corp. of the Americas has settled four lawsuits for injuries and one death allegedly related to the company's power morcellator surgical device, according to The Morning Call. READ MORE
MORE LAPAROSCOPIC POWER MORCELLATION LEGAL NEWS
- Power Morcellation Suits Wrap Up but Doctors Still Like Procedure
- Power Morcellators Fast-Tracked Through FDA 510(k) Clearance
- Regulatory Concern Mounting Over Power Morcellators, Adverse Events Reports
- Damning Report on FDA Approval of Power Morcellators Released
READ MORE Operating Room Equipment Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Drugs/Medical Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Malpractice Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Drugs/Medical Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Malpractice Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READER COMMENTS
Zineta Osmanovic
on
Celeste
on
Elisabeth Durant
on
Britt Moise
on
Anonymous
on
Super tampons and pads would not be efficient. Adult diapers along with towels padded underneath them were the only thing that would control the bleeding. Sudden gushes of blood would unpredictably happen on a weekly basis. I no longer could stand and do my job which was a successful well-paid high end hairstylist. One month from surgery I had an ultrasound that showed 2 fibroid tumors. I didn't know what was happening the surgeon just told me a hysterectomy would solve the problem. The problem was I wanted children I went in for a simple procedure with no chance of ending in a hysterectomy. I wanted a life like everybody else I wanted to get married I wanted to have a family. I wanted my life back so bad but it ended and changed forever. I went on trying to wait till something came out maybe something new surgery some type of hope so that I could have a family. The bleeding got worse the tissue continued to come out of my vagina and it got more painful. Finally I lost everything and lived in my car. I was so weak I could hardly stand I had to sit in the shower I couldn't lift a small box even. I didn't really have air in my lungs from the lack of blood in my body. By the time I finally gave in to any chance of ever having a family and had a hysterectomy a fibroid mass the size of a large melon was removed from my uterus. At least 5 large lemon size fibroid tumors that the mor morcelator had caused. The tool had spun the seeds that are inside fibroids around my uterus. The fibroid seeds are lime wart seeds and spreed. The tool had planted the seeds like a well for garden. The fibroids grew they were so well seeded. Life was never the same and is much different today then before that day of surgery. No woman should have to go through this. I was born with the ability to have a child family and that was taken from me in a few moments with a tool that should have never been made.