LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft
The Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft has been linked to life-threatening complications in patients who were given Medtronic off-label. Medtronic bone graft complications include swelling of the airways, which can cause difficulty breathing, speaking and swallowing. Medtronic Infuse has also been linked to retrograde ejaculation which can lead to male sterility. A number of Medtronic lawsuits allege the manufacturer illegally promoted the Medtronic bone product for off-label uses.
March 28, 2013: Lawyers for plaintiffs in the Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft litigation believe that injuries received from this product, dating back to as early as 2003, may still be able to file a claim. As with all litigation, the attorneys state that such claims will likely face a vigorous statute of limitations defense but they are working with clients to help protect their potential claims, and anyone who believes they have been injured should seek the advice of competent counsel.
The Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft is used during surgery to stimulate bone growth and replace damaged spinal disks. It was marketed and sold as one of the alternatives to harvesting a bone graft from the hip. The Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft is not approved for any other uses but it has been used off-label in cervical spine (neck) procedures.
In 2002 the FDA granted Medtronic approval for its Infuse Bone Graft, but for limited use in the lumbar spine, or lower back, and for some oral and dental procedures. Specifically, the agency approved the Infuse Bone Graft to treat degenerative disc disease and open fractures on the tibia. The FDA also approved Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft for use in sinus augmentation and localized alveolar ridge augmentation.
Medtronic, however, allegedly encouraged physicians to use its Infuse bone stimulator off-label in the cervical spine, which helped generate sales of more than $3 billion for the manufacturer. As of September of 2008, about 680,000 units of Infuse Bone Grafts had been used in the US, according to Medtronic.
The Medtronic bone graft contains recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein (rhBMP), which is a genetically engineered version of a protein that is naturally released by the body. Use of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein initiates bone growth in specific areas of the spine, giving surgeons some control over where the bone re-growth occurs.
The Medtronic Infuse bone growth stimulator in the cervical spine has been associated with many serious problems, including:
In the wake of at least 38 reports of complications, In July 2008, the FDA issued a warning concerning off-label Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft use, stating that risks were associated with the use of the bone graft on the cervical spine. The agency's warning stated," that the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP in the cervical spine have not been demonstrated and these products are not approved by FDA for this use."
The reports included patients who experienced difficulty swallowing, breathing and speaking, caused by a "compression of the airway and/or neurological structures in the neck." Many of the patients required emergency treatment, which included tracheotomies, anti-inflammatory medications, feeding tubes and second surgeries.
The Wall Street Journal (09/08/08) reported that FDA records showed approximately 200 adverse events where patients experienced serious complications after the bone graft was used off-label.
According to reports, some doctors who used the bone graft system or who wrote favorable reports about the product may have been paid by Medtronic. The Wall Street Journal also said that Medtronic paid approximately $800,000 over three years to a surgeon who was accused of fabricating a study that reported positive results for the Infuse Bone Graft.
The doctor involved, Timothy R. Kuklo, allegedly based the study on "falsified information" and forged the signatures of supposed co-authors. Medtronic said the payments were related to the doctor's work developing products and speaking at company events.
Meanwhile, the FDA was reportedly concerned about Medtronic off-label use of the Infuse Bone Graft before the product was even approved, according to The Wall Street Journal. At the time, Dr. Scott Boden, speaking to an FDA advisory committee, said the discussion of off-label use should not be a focus of the meeting. Dr. Boden allegedly received more than $100,000 a year from Medtronic.
In June 2011, the US Senate Finance Committee announced it is investigating surgeons who were paid consultants for Medtronic. Committee members Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) sent Medtronic a letter to demand that key financial records, communications and documents be turned over to the Committee.
The inquiry, which will look into whether those surgeons failed to report complications associated with the Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft, was announced because a soon-to-be-published study suggests that the bone graft product was linked to complications during clinical trials but those complications were not properly reported. Some of those complications reportedly include swelling in the neck and throat, abnormal bone growth and sterility.
In July 2011 The Spine Journal published a number of articles regarding the risks associated with Medtronic' Infuse Bone Graft, including the following:
At least three lawsuits were filed against Medtronic by former employees, who alleged the company gave doctors incentives to use Infuse Bone Graft and other Medtronic spine products. Two of the cases were settled without Medtronic admitting wrongdoing.
In December 2008 a Medtronic Infuse wrongful death lawsuit was filed on behalf of a California woman who went into a coma following surgery and died. The lawsuit claimed that Medtronic failed to warn about the risks associated with use of the device in the neck, and that Medtronic actively encouraged off-label uses, none of which have been approved by the FDA.
Another lawsuit claimed that the Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft was used during a cervical spine fusion, which caused the plaintiff severe swelling in the neck and throat. He underwent an emergency tracheotomy.
In July 2011 a California woman filed a lawsuit against Medtronic and Stryker Biotech, both medical device manufacturers, claiming that the companies fraudulently promoted their products for unapproved, off-label use, which was dangerous and resulted in her serious injuries. The plaintiff, 34-year-old April Cabana, was left with nerve compression and severe pain in her lower back and extremities after surgery using a Stryker product. She required a second surgery: her surgeon used Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft in order to fuse the bone, but the product had not been FDA approved for this procedure. According to the lawsuit, Medtronic illegally promoted it for a number of off-label procedures. The surgery made Ms. Cabana' condition worse.
In September 2011, a Florida woman, Jennifer English, filed a personal injury lawsuit against Medtronic. In August 2007, English was implanted with Medtronic's Infuse Bone Graft during a posterior-approach lumbar spine surgery, which was not FDA approved. The lawsuit claims that Infuse caused her to develop ectopic, or uncontrolled, bone growth in her spine, compressing nerves and leading to chronic and ongoing severe pain. It also alleges that Medtronic fraudulently misrepresented the risks and benefits of Infuse and improperly promoted and marketed Infuse for non-FDA approved uses.
Last updated on
FREE MEDTRONIC INFUSE BONE GRAFT LAWSUIT EVALUATION
Send your Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
Medtronic Bone Graft Lawsuit Update
Medtronic Bone Graft
In 2002 the FDA granted Medtronic approval for its Infuse Bone Graft, but for limited use in the lumbar spine, or lower back, and for some oral and dental procedures. Specifically, the agency approved the Infuse Bone Graft to treat degenerative disc disease and open fractures on the tibia. The FDA also approved Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft for use in sinus augmentation and localized alveolar ridge augmentation.
Medtronic, however, allegedly encouraged physicians to use its Infuse bone stimulator off-label in the cervical spine, which helped generate sales of more than $3 billion for the manufacturer. As of September of 2008, about 680,000 units of Infuse Bone Grafts had been used in the US, according to Medtronic.
The Medtronic bone graft contains recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein (rhBMP), which is a genetically engineered version of a protein that is naturally released by the body. Use of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein initiates bone growth in specific areas of the spine, giving surgeons some control over where the bone re-growth occurs.
Medtronic Complications with Bone Graft Cervical Spine Use
- Difficulty Breathing, Swallowing or Speaking
- Compression of the Airway
- Respiratory Depression
- Nerve Damage
- Death
FDA Warning on Medtronic Off-Label Use
The reports included patients who experienced difficulty swallowing, breathing and speaking, caused by a "compression of the airway and/or neurological structures in the neck." Many of the patients required emergency treatment, which included tracheotomies, anti-inflammatory medications, feeding tubes and second surgeries.
The Wall Street Journal (09/08/08) reported that FDA records showed approximately 200 adverse events where patients experienced serious complications after the bone graft was used off-label.
Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Study Conflict of Interest
The doctor involved, Timothy R. Kuklo, allegedly based the study on "falsified information" and forged the signatures of supposed co-authors. Medtronic said the payments were related to the doctor's work developing products and speaking at company events.
Meanwhile, the FDA was reportedly concerned about Medtronic off-label use of the Infuse Bone Graft before the product was even approved, according to The Wall Street Journal. At the time, Dr. Scott Boden, speaking to an FDA advisory committee, said the discussion of off-label use should not be a focus of the meeting. Dr. Boden allegedly received more than $100,000 a year from Medtronic.
Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Investigation
The inquiry, which will look into whether those surgeons failed to report complications associated with the Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft, was announced because a soon-to-be-published study suggests that the bone graft product was linked to complications during clinical trials but those complications were not properly reported. Some of those complications reportedly include swelling in the neck and throat, abnormal bone growth and sterility.
In July 2011 The Spine Journal published a number of articles regarding the risks associated with Medtronic' Infuse Bone Graft, including the following:
- Medtronic' failure to accurately report the side effects from its clinical trials;
- Medtronic' failure to report that many of the authors who studied and promoted its product had significant financial ties to the company;
- that Infuse Bone Graft can cause severe problems with nerves and spinal cords;
- and that off-label use of Infuse Bone Graft can lead to severe side effects.
Medtronic Lawsuits
In December 2008 a Medtronic Infuse wrongful death lawsuit was filed on behalf of a California woman who went into a coma following surgery and died. The lawsuit claimed that Medtronic failed to warn about the risks associated with use of the device in the neck, and that Medtronic actively encouraged off-label uses, none of which have been approved by the FDA.
Another lawsuit claimed that the Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft was used during a cervical spine fusion, which caused the plaintiff severe swelling in the neck and throat. He underwent an emergency tracheotomy.
In July 2011 a California woman filed a lawsuit against Medtronic and Stryker Biotech, both medical device manufacturers, claiming that the companies fraudulently promoted their products for unapproved, off-label use, which was dangerous and resulted in her serious injuries. The plaintiff, 34-year-old April Cabana, was left with nerve compression and severe pain in her lower back and extremities after surgery using a Stryker product. She required a second surgery: her surgeon used Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft in order to fuse the bone, but the product had not been FDA approved for this procedure. According to the lawsuit, Medtronic illegally promoted it for a number of off-label procedures. The surgery made Ms. Cabana' condition worse.
In September 2011, a Florida woman, Jennifer English, filed a personal injury lawsuit against Medtronic. In August 2007, English was implanted with Medtronic's Infuse Bone Graft during a posterior-approach lumbar spine surgery, which was not FDA approved. The lawsuit claims that Infuse caused her to develop ectopic, or uncontrolled, bone growth in her spine, compressing nerves and leading to chronic and ongoing severe pain. It also alleges that Medtronic fraudulently misrepresented the risks and benefits of Infuse and improperly promoted and marketed Infuse for non-FDA approved uses.
Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered illness, or damages resulting from the use of a Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft, please click the link below to send your complaint to a lawyer to evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.Last updated on
MEDTRONIC INFUSE BONE GRAFT LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
Medtronic Double-Dipping?
Medtronic Meddling Leads to Class-Action Lawsuit
Medtronic Lawsuit Plaintiffs Earn Relief from Special Appeals Court
March 23, 2015
Scott had no idea that his difficulty swallowing could be linked to a Medtronic Infuse bone graft. He was only aware of Medtronic complications when bone began to grow outside of the graft. Ironically, Medtronic is now selling a device to help with swallowing complications! It’s hard to swallow, but could Medtronic be double-dipping? READ MORE
Medtronic Meddling Leads to Class-Action Lawsuit
December 1, 2014
Allen, a Medtronic Infuse bone graft victim, is reading with great interest a Medtronic class-action lawsuit filed by its investors, claiming that Medtronic intentionally misled them and charging the CEO in a cover-up. READ MORE
Medtronic Lawsuit Plaintiffs Earn Relief from Special Appeals Court
November 8, 2014
The plaintiffs in a Medtronic lawsuit may have faced stormy seas when a trial court dismissed various claims against the manufacturer of the Medtronic Infuse bone graft. However, when a Special Appeals Court reviewed the case within the framework of the Medical Device Amendments Act of 1976 (MDA) and the various nuances of the framework that governs whether or not state obligations are preempted by federal oversight, the plaintiffs found some relief. READ MORE
READ MORE Drugs/Medical Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READER COMMENTS
Gena coley smith
on
I need help with holding someone accountable. I have to be in pain, and endure the side affects for te he rest of my life! It effects my life with my grandkids. I wish I could do more with them. My quality of .I've stinks now. Living off of disability, verses, holding a job on Master level pay STINKS!
PLEASE HELP! OR POINT ME IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. WHEN THESE LAW SUITS HAPPENED I WAS IN AND OUT THE HOSPITAL. SOMETIMES MONTHS AT A TIME. I SHOULD HAVE BEE. NOTIFIED.
Eliza polatis
on
Sheron tribble
on
Sharon M Smith
on
Kathleen Turner
on
pain
on
This has destroyed my life just not sure how much more I can take, a friend or rather someone I met on chronic pain site just got offered 6800.00 and attorneys are taking 1/2 that, Not sure about everyone else but I've been on this roll a coaster 250 years so family and friends left along time ago. its draining and no one will hire us.
hanging by a thread
randy
on
Anonymous
on
Scott
on
Ricky Nelson
on
Pissed off & Disgusted
on
Kat
on
Melody Heather
on
Carmen
on
speak on behalf of everyone that is seriously injured from the medtronic bonegraft HELP US TO GET JUSTICE we are suffering much to long.
Tammy Vedros
on
Anonymous
on
I remember waking up in recovery thinking it was a miracle--as I had no pain previously associated with the herniated disc--the new and only pain initially was incision related--my stomach and my back had multiple stiches from my belly button down to my groin--But almost two weeks to the day of surgery--I set in with the most horrific pain I ever dreamed possible to bear by a human--plus severe swelling in my hips, legs and feet ! I called the surgeons and they ordered me to come in for x-rays thinking something may have moved or shifted--but that was the beginning of cover-up. The swelling and new-found pain was the beginning stages of me rejecting the Infuse compounds.
I have since found out that the two surgeons who pushed this on me were actually part of the "Ghost Writing Team" of doctors that were paid to alter--falsify and edit test subject data to assist in the FDA approval of the infuse device. Anyway--Since November of 2014 to current day 2/4/15--I have been in the hospital four times--two different hospitals and four different doctors have diagnosed me with Severe Pain Induced Hypertension--like Stroke--Heart Attack hypertension--and under closely monitored conditions--my blood pressure is too low if my pain is under control and being administered blood pressure medication. All blood pressure medication had to be discontinued as long as my pain was being controlled. Recently I have been told that there is ectopic--like way too much and unwanted bone growth going on--where my vertebrae now looks like a 2X4 in one solid piece from my hips to the middle of my shoulder blades--yes one solid block of white bone ! And I get worse every day ! Also recently I have discovered--that the two surgeons that performed my surgery--once thought they were paid NINE Million dollars by Medtronic for their research duties--to just days ago--I have found out that the two surgeons (MONSTERS) were paid 23 Million Dollars for their ghost writing and editing skills.
Also, the two surgeons just happened to own the hospital where this night mare surgery took place--and I worried about records mysteriously disappearing--August of 2014 I marched into the hospital demanding my Operation Chart Report--and Mystically one of the surgeon's names had been removed or redacted from the hospital surgical report ! But Guess What ? I have a bill from him that my insurance paid to him (over $10,000) for his assistance in my surgery ! That my suffering friends--is the kind of stuff that put Al Capone away for good ! And I would love to see much the same for these "so-called" doctors ! good luck to all of you--but there isn't much hope for me !
Anonymous
on
Missouri
on
Anonymous
on
Illinois
on
Wisconsin
on
Kentucky
on
Georgia
on
South Carolina
on
Anonymous
on
Anonymous
on
Georgia
on
Anonymous
on
Had low back fused, lumbar L3-S1 fused w/Infuse BMP by force, because of the disc replacements that were put in between L4-5 & L5-S1 shifted, causing the L5 vertebra to shatter. The lumbar fusion was done as an emergency due to fear of the bone cutting through spinal cord. None of that makes dealing w/the pain any easier, it's constant & really exhausting. Never able to sleep & tired of the pain meds constantly have to take. Never know when legs will give out when walking or on stairs, can't walk, sit or stand for very long w/o unbelievable pain. Have stomach & bowel problems that seem to be getting worse as time goes by, now afraid of trouble at incision site because of severe pain in that area to extent clothing hurts touching it.
Texas
on
Florida
on
Minnesota
on
California
on
in left arm and hand. While holding anything, even paper, in my left hand it will fall to the floor without my feeling it.
Is it possible Actifuse is as bad as Infuse?
California
on
Missouri
on
Florida
on
California
on
California
on