LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
Reverse Mortgage Lawsuit
Some reverse mortgage lenders are accused of using deceptive and aggressive tactics to lure senior homeowners into taking out a reverse mortgage. Among the complaints about information on reverse mortgages seniors say they are given are allegations that seniors were not informed of the risks associated with reverse mortgages and were told there was no risk of a reverse mortgage default leading to foreclosure. In truth, there is a possibility of defaulting, and many seniors have had their homes foreclosed when they were unable to pay the reverse mortgage.
A reverse mortgage allows senior homeowners (over the age of 62) to borrow a certain amount of money against the value of their home without having to make any interest or principal payments. The mortgage is only due when the homeowner dies, sells the house or moves out. Accrued interest is added to the loan balance.
But, interest rates are typically higher than on traditional mortgages and the interest compounds, meaning by the time the homeowner has to pay back the reverse mortgage, he or she could owe more than double what was initially loaned. Furthermore, homeowners are still responsible for paying the insurance and taxes.
In some cases, older spouses have been put on the deed for the reverse mortgage and the younger spouses told their names could be added later. When their name wasn't added and their older spouse passed away, the lenders came looking for repayment and threatened foreclosure if they did not get it.
In addition to how quickly the interest compounds, there are concerns with how aggressive lenders are in marketing to seniors. Complaints include lenders marketing to seniors who cannot afford the fees, not explaining the risks associated with reverse mortgages and deceptive sales tactics. Some lenders have been accused of marketing reverse mortgages as free money. Others reportedly told seniors there was no risk of losing their home.
Some reverse mortgage lawsuits have been filed against lenders, alleging their tactics are illegal. In 2011, lawsuits were reportedly filed against Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae, alleging they used illegal means to foreclose on homes that were subject to reverse mortgages. According to the lawsuits, the people who took out the reverse mortgage paid insurance that guaranteed when the borrower died, heirs would have the opportunity to buy the home at its appraised value, not at the value of the full mortgage balance, if home prices fell. Despite this, some lenders are accused of forcing heirs to pay the full mortgage balance, not the appraised value of the home. When the heirs refused, they lenders allegedly pushed the home into foreclosure.
Published on Oct-19-12
FREE REVERSE MORTGAGE LAWSUIT EVALUATION
Send your Reverse Mortgage claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
Reverse Mortgage
But, interest rates are typically higher than on traditional mortgages and the interest compounds, meaning by the time the homeowner has to pay back the reverse mortgage, he or she could owe more than double what was initially loaned. Furthermore, homeowners are still responsible for paying the insurance and taxes.
In some cases, older spouses have been put on the deed for the reverse mortgage and the younger spouses told their names could be added later. When their name wasn't added and their older spouse passed away, the lenders came looking for repayment and threatened foreclosure if they did not get it.
Information on Reverse Mortgage
Reverse Mortgage Attorney
Reverse Mortgage Lawsuit Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your Reverse Mortgage Lawsuit complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.Published on Oct-19-12
REVERSE MORTGAGE LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
Reverse Mortgage Lenders Allegedly Prey on Seniors
October 26, 2012
For some seniors, the money offered through a reverse mortgage can be a lifesaver. People living on a fixed income might not have enough money to make ends meet in the case of illness or injury, so money obtained from a reverse mortgage lender can seem like the ideal solution. Unfortunately, some reverse mortgage lenders are accused of unethical tactics, including misleading seniors about the risks associated with a reverse mortgage so they experience a reverse mortgage default and their home is foreclosed. READ MORE
READ MORE Mortgage Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Consumer Banking Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Financial Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Consumer Banking Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Financial Settlements and Legal News
READER COMMENTS
mark stone
on
MICHAEL
on
Ms. Colbert for Mrs. Bailey
on
New Lender constantly without notifying Homeowner interferes with Homeowners Role of Responsibility regarding payment's of Property Taxes and acquiring Homeowners Insurance. Contract vaguely and inappropriately states "PAY IN A TIMELY MANNER" [adopting HUDs' terminology to Lender's Only, not homeowner's].
For years now, Lender quickly jumped ahead of Mrs. Bailey to pay gross property taxes once posted without notifying her in advance & asking if she will be paying her own p-taxes. Also without awaiting for her rightful 'Senior Citizen Exemptions' to be processed and applied to reduce gross p-tax total.
In addition, Lender also would somehow cause Insurer's to falsely cancel insurance policies she acquired and then quickly order up a policy through their own 'Affiliated-Insurers' and pay the Annual Premiums on it on her behalf.
Lender next waited 3-5 yrs of accumulation of such payments to DEMAND FULL 'ALL-AT-ONCE' REPAYMENT of taxes paid on her behalf!
When Mrs. Bailey tried to repay they refused to accept check claiming "No 'Repayment Plan' set up." She kept calling leaving callback number but never received a Repayment Plan. Lender continued their roguish practice on p-taxes and insurance.
Suddenly in past year Lender filed a filed a: 'Default of Judgement of Foreclosure' against her and said property.
Now Housing Counselor filed 'Answer and Appearance' in reply to Foreclosure Complaint docs citing all the above. Meanwhile, Mrs. Bailey received a breath of fresh air when IHDA's Illinois Hardest Hit Fund approved her application to ask them to pay the Lender putting her account back into good stead.
Yet, meanwhile her roof is about to cave in needing drastic repair and outside exposure to rodent animals as well. Yet Lender HAS NEVER OFFERED TO INFORM HER OF THEIR 'Property Preservation Division' which aides homeowners with major repairs!
Essentially IHDA decision HALTS foreclosure Default Claim.
CASE DISMISSED
Meanwhile, Civil Suit ensues against Lender:
Lender hired New Jersey company to check if home was abandoned. Instead, crew burglarized the property, throwing all container contents on the floors throughout the home and stealing major appliances & more! Lender claims company was not told to enter premises. Company was only to peer through non-draped windows to see if furniture was inside and then leave! HUMPH!
Betsy
on
Betsy
on
Frank W Schneider
on
Barbara Beardsley Brandt
on
jessica zowd
on
Tee jay
on
Debra Chase
on
Lori
on
Nancy Fookes
on
Nancy S
on
Since 2009 when my father died, my mother and I paid the bills and taxes on this property, and when Mom died in 2013, I have been the sole bill payer of the utilities and some of the taxes. I think my sister who changed the taxes in her name last year paid the balance, who knows!! I also got an insurance bill in my name and Mom's name in 2014-2015 and that was paid by someone and not me!!! Well well well, there's a snake in the grass in this mess!
Nancy S
Tania M. Lewis
on
My father ~ James E. Lewis ~ who owned only 5/7ths of his property, was granted a reverse mortgage in 2011. There were others who owned the remaining 2/7ths. None of them were qualified for the loan nor did they benefit.
They found out about the reverse mortgage after my father passed away on 2014. Needless to say, they're enraged.
As heir & administrator of my father's estate, I feel I owe my family some kind of solution to a 2 year painful probate process. As it stands now, title is clouded because there are 4 different estates we're dealing with.
Right now, we're going through a default judgment suit. However, the 2/7ths titeholders are not responsible for paying back this loan! They had nothing to do with it.
Basically, what they're asking is to have tbis loan dismissed, or at least, negotiate more money in the settlement.
For almost 2 years, I've been trying to find pro bono attorneys, or attorneys that will work on contingency. I've even looked into law clinics where law students can take on unique cases such as this. So far, I've had no luck.
In sum, Generation/Champion Mortgage should not profit from such a serious mistake (in neglecting due diligence concerning title).
Thank you.
Don
on
Sandra Eszlinger
on
Holli hysell
on
donna s dixon
on
John
on
Debbie Neel
on
We Received 1098 in our Father's name and social security number. I Called RMS the company the reverse mortgage is thru, they said they couldn't change the 1098 to our Trust name and assigned EIN #. SO THE TRUST CAN CLAIM 108 K IN INTEREST. Is this true.
IS THIS LEGAL?
Houston
on
Grass Valley
on
jeane petersen
on
catherine mcnally
on
Doris Avery
on
Say my husband and I, or just one of us, has a car accident , then perhaps it's our negligence [ God forbid ] we are only in our young 70's mind you...but, if that did happen and we didn't have enough ins. liability on our car or motorcycle polices and the injured parties sued us... how would that affect our reverse mortgage ?
I assumed that their/ Mortgage co. being the first lien holder nothing would come of it in that respect except they/ injured parties, would be entitled to whatever would be left over after our deaths and the house is sold...am I correct ? that's supposedly we couldn't afford to pay any judgement of the amt. over our policies. Is this interesting enough to answer me back ? or do I need an attorney to answer my questions ? thank you
New Jersey
on
New Jersey
on
lending. At 81 years old, she was unable to make that kind of decision. The foreclosure process is now accelerated to final judgement stage.
Anonymous
on