Bank Faces $10 Million Fine Linked to Overdraft Fees

Boston, MASantander Bank reportedly faces $10 million in fines after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found the company misled customers about its overdraft protection program. Banks and credit unions have faced increasing scrutiny in recent years over excessive overdraft fees and other unethical practices, and consumers have fought back, in some cases filing lawsuits against financial institutions for egregious activities.

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Santander Bank used aggressive tactics with its call campaigns to encourage customers to opt into its overdraft protection plan.

Customer service representatives operating on Santander's behalf were accused of not following the script provided by the financial institution and signing customers up for overdraft even when they had not authorized the change. Despite receiving complaints about their customer service representatives, Santander continued to use the same telemarketing vendor to increase overdraft opt-in.

Among the allegations made against Santander was enrolling consumers in the overdraft protection plan without authorization, telling consumers overdraft protection was free when it was not, using consumer requests for more information as approval for opting into the program, misrepresenting the fees associated with overdraft protection, and assuring customers the sales call was not actually a sales call (increasing the perception the overdraft protection was free).

On one call included in the CFPB's court documents, the representative responds to a question about costs associated with the program by saying, "There is no monthly or annual fee and even after you do over, um, overdraw your account, and then there's - that's the only time there's a fee of $35 and even if it takes you a while to pay it up, it's only that $35 that you'll ever have to pay. There's no other fees after that."

In fact, the CFPB argues, consumers are charged $35 per overdraft transaction, plus a one-time $35 fee if the account was still overdrawn six days later.

Additionally, the customer service representatives were accused of telling consumers they would be charged overdraft fees even if they did not enroll in overdraft protection or they would pay additional fees that were not charged to overdraft enrollees when in fact Santander did not charge additional fees to consumers who did not opt-in for overdraft protection.

"Santander tricked consumers into signing up for an overdraft service they didn't want and charged them fees," said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. "Santander's telemarketer used deceptive sales pitches to mislead customers into enrolling into overdraft service."

Changes to banking rules in 2010 made it illegal for banks to charge overdraft fees on ATM and one-time debit card transactions unless consumers opted-in for the service.

Santander was ordered by the CFPB to pay $10 million in fines. The financial firm will also have to validate all opt-ins that were approved through the vendor, not use a vender to telemarket overdraft programs, and increase its oversight of all third-party telemarketers.

The administrative proceeding is file number 2016-CFPB-0012.