The mother, Miranda Garcia, was 39 weeks pregnant when she was admitted to Reading Hospital in late September 2018. According to the lawsuit, the obstetrical care team acted with gross and reckless negligence. Before the delivery, the hospital failed to identify and respond to an intra-amniotic infection (called chorioamnionitis) that Garcia contracted. They did not provide antibiotics despite evidence of infection and failed to perform an emergency caesarean section when the electronic monitors showed that the baby, known as D.O., had a ‘non-reassuring fetal heat pattern’ which carried with it a risk of oxygen deprivation. Court documents state that monitors indicated signs of fetal distress, and this should have resulted in an earlier delivery to avoid oxygen deprivation. Instead, Reading’s labor and delivery team, led by defendant obstetrician Dominic Cammarano, used forceps and a vacuum extractor in an attempt to deliver him.
That decision caused D.O. to sustain Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), a type of brain damage caused by a lack of oxygen to the brain before or shortly after birth. Further, after D.O.’s birth, the medical team failed to provide the infant with therapeutic hypothermia--a type of treatment to lower the body temperature that tries to reduce injury and long-term problems.
But the hospital and many doctors named in the suit said the allegations are conclusory. The hospital argued that Garcia had not shown evidence of the alleged infection and that the clinical circumstances of the case did not indicate that therapeutic hypothermia was appropriate. As well, D.O.’s umbilical cord blood gas at birth had been normal. According to Law.com, the defendant’s pretrial memo stated, “Normal cord blood gasses rule out hypoxia-ischemia in the period just before birth and rule out the impact of labor related events.”
READ MORE BIRTH INJURY AND BIRTH DEFECT LEGAL NEWS
Tower Health, which operates Reading Hospital, said in a statement: "We value and respect the privacy of the family involved in this lawsuit. To avoid a protracted public trial and the potential distress it could cause all parties, a resolution was reached without any admission of fault or liability by any healthcare providers at Reading Hospital. Consistent with our longstanding policy, we do not comment on the specifics of litigation."