In 2015, a lawsuit was filed against GrubHub alleging delivery drivers were misclassified as independent contractors. The claim is similar to those that were made against Lyft and Uber: that drivers are treated like employees but classified as independent contractors to avoid offering proper benefits and protections.
For drivers who claim they are employees, there could be a lot at stake. Not only are independent contractors not offered minimum wage, overtime and benefits, they are often responsible for their own costs of doing business, including vehicle maintenance, gas and parking charges.
GrubHub contracts drivers to deliver food from restaurants who do not hire their own delivery drivers. But those drivers allege they are treated like employees, not like independent contractors. Independent contractors are able to set their own charges for providing a service and typically have a great deal of authority over how they carry out their job duties.
READ MORE CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW LEGAL NEWS
A settlement was reached in the Uber lawsuit, but that settlement was overturned by the judge, who found that the dollar amount of the settlement was too low. US District Judge Vince Chhabria ordered the two sides to come to a new agreement that more fairly compensates drivers for their claims. The settlement did not result in drivers being reclassified as employees.
In addition to the California lawsuit, GrubHub now faces a federal lawsuit filed in the Northern District of Illinois.
The GrubHub lawsuit is Tan, et al. v. GrubHub Inc., case number 3:15-cv-05128, District Court, Northern District of California.
READER COMMENTS
Stew Pidassil
on