In-N-Out Burger is accused of numerous California Labor Code violations, including failure to follow COVID safety protocols
Los Angeles, CAA former employee of In-N-Out Burger accuses the fast food restaurant chain of numerous California Labor Code violations, and unfair business practices, from COVID protocol failure to retaliation for whistleblowing. Luis Becerra is seeking to represent current and former In-N-Out employees dating back to January 2020.
Former In-N-Out butcher Luis Becerra filed a Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) complaint and a report with the L.A. Public Health Department. He also informed other butchers of their right to report workplace safety concerns adding in the PAGA complaint that other hourly employees are similarly aggrieved. The PAGA lawsuit enables employees to bring lawsuits over labor violations to recover civil penalties for themselves, other employees and the state. According to the National Law Review, Becarra accuses the chain of the following:
Failing to pay wages due upon termination;
Failing to provide accurate wage statements;
Failing to timely provide personnel files;
Failing to furnish a safe place of employment and not discharge employees who complain of health and safety conditions;
Discrimination and retaliation for using sick leave;
Retaliating for his engaging in protected reporting activities;
Failure to Enforce COVID Safety Protocol
According to the lawsuit, In-N-Out failed to enforce COVID-19 safety measures, including social distancing and requiring employees to wear personal protective equipment (PPE). In his report to the L.A. Public Health Department, Becerra claims the meat department was full of sick employees, many of whom exhibited COVID-19 symptoms, but In-N-Out did not place them on medical leave. Further, his lawsuit states that Becerra complained to the local public health department when the pandemic hit. An inspection was carried out and during that time Becarra encouraged co-workers to file their own health complaints.
Other Alleged Violations
Included in his complaint, Becarra was written up for absences in December 2018, despite providing a doctor's note saying he had to take time off due to pneumonia. In 2019 In-N-Out marked him absent after a supervisor had given him permission to switch work days to attend his daughter's school event. That same year, Becerra said he reported to management that a supervisor (same supervisor?) had sexually harassed his girlfriend. Becerra was written up again, this time for "not listening to his manager" and offering to buy him event tickets "as long as he kept quiet about the incident," he said.
In-N-Out Burger Defense
In-N-Out Burger portrays Becarra rather as a trouble-maker. In its defense, the fast food chain says the butcher was fired because he provided false documentation about an absence and exhausted his sick leave. (Law360 reports that Becarra and similarly aggrieved employees were terminated for attempting to use sick leave.) In May 2020, after he missed work due to asthma, Becerra apparently forged a medical note. "At In-N-Out Burger, we have always cared for our associates as if they are our own family and we are disappointed with the baseless and false claims that Mr. Becerra has made in his lawsuit,” said Arnie Wensinger, chief legal and business officer for In-N-Out, in a statement to Law360.
Becerra worked as an In-N-Out butcher from 2015 to May 2020. The case isBecerra v. In-N-Out Burger, Cal. Super. Ct., No. 21STCV17045.
If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to an employment law lawyer who may evaluate your California Labor Law claim at no cost or obligation.