One of the latest examples of litigation alleging affronts to California labor employment law is a class-action California labor lawsuit targeting Inter-Coast International Training (Inter-Coast). The assertion, according to court documents, is that employees were not paid overtime in accordance with overtime laws.
Specifically, it is alleged the defendant improperly classified its instructors as exempt from qualifying for overtime while being made to undertake non-exempt administrative tasks such as grading exams, submitting attendance reports and adhering to course outlines at the behest of the employer. Performing such tasks, according to the California labor lawsuit, effectively pushed them into an overtime situation, for which the plaintiffs should have been paid overtime.
California law allows that employees involved in administrative tasks, employed as supervisors or undertaking management functions - and salaried employees who achieve a certain income threshold - can be considered exempt from overtime. Thus, when work commitments require additional hours from time to time as needed, it is thought that management personnel and other highly paid staff members are already sufficiently compensated and thus, are not afforded the opportunity for overtime pay.
READ MORE CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW LEGAL NEWS
A common practice amongst employers attempting to minimize the costs associated with overtime is the misclassification of employees as exempt from overtime. Thus, employees classified as exempt who wind up performing non-exempt tasks for the majority of their day, will often turn to the courts through a California labor lawsuit.
Such is the case here. The California employee labor law class action is Suzanne Taylor-Bacon et al v. Inter-Coast International Training, Inc. Case No. FCS046848, filed April 1, 2016 in the Superior Court for the State of California, in and for the County of Solano.