The lawsuit was filed by drivers for Uber, who alleged they should have been classed as employees, not as independent contractors. The line is a significant one: independent contractors have more discretion in carrying out their job duties, but they also have to pay their own maintenance fees and are not given employee benefits. Employees have less discretion over their job, but they have more protections.
Drivers say Uber controlled their jobs as though they were employees, but classified them as independent contractors. As such, they were not paid overtime nor given other protections and were forced to pay for gas, fees, and maintenance related to their vehicles.
In April 2016, a settlement worth $100 million was announced. But that settlement did not get Uber drivers classified as employees. Instead, they would stay as independent contractors - with no rights to minimum wage or overtime - and Uber would simply change its termination policy.
READ MORE CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW LEGAL NEWS
In a similar lawsuit, a settlement between Lyft and its drivers was recently rejected by the judge. In that case, the federal judge found that the initial proposed settlement of $12.25 million was too low. In May, Lyft offered to pay $27 million to settle the lawsuit and said it would change its terms of service to make the terms of driver termination more clear.
Uber also faces a lawsuit in New York City.
The California lawsuit is O’Connor v. Uber, case number 3:13-cv-03826, in the US District Court in the Northern District of California.