Although the agreement does not go so far as to classify Uber drivers as employees under California law, it "is nonetheless of significant value to class members," the motion for preliminary approval filed on behalf of the drivers states. Uber drivers argued that the service provider misclassified them as independent contractors and therefore failed to pay minimum wage and overtime, reimburse business expenses and provide itemized pay statements and sick leave.
Drivers had asked for a summary judgment last August, during which time they claimed that Uber had misclassified them under a California worker status test known as the ABC test, which was put in place as part of Assembly Bill 5, a new state law.
The settlement, scheduled for final approval before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in June, involves drivers who say they were misclassified as contractors instead of full employees, opted out of arbitration agreements and worked for the company between Feb. 28, 2019, and Dec. 17, 2020 – when Prop 22 was enacted. Each driver, under the proposed settlement, would be entitled to part of the settlement based on the number of miles drivers picked up passengers and food deliveries, as well as the number of miles driven. The case is James v. Uber Technologies, Inc., N.D. Cal., No. 3:19-cv-06462, motion for preliminary approval 2/17/22.