Two studies, published in BMJ in October 2013, reportedly overstated the incidence of adverse reactions to statins. The problem, Forbes (5/14/14) reports, is that both papers improperly cited a previous paper, which resulted in an overstatement of the incidence of adverse events.
Initially, BMJ and the studies’ authors wrote a correction, which for one study kept the incidence of adverse reactions at “substantially higher than the 5% to 10% percent usually described in randomized, placebo-controlled trials,” but noted that the study they cited was uncontrolled and may be inflated.
BMJ had published an editorial noting that the adverse incident figure of 18 to 20 percent was based on statements in an observational study and did not take into account important caveats to the study. Therefore, statements suggesting adverse events occurred in 18 to 20 percent of patients were withdrawn. At the time, the editor-in-chief, Fiona Goodlee, noted that the incorrect statements were secondary to the primary focus of the articles and as such, the full articles should not be retracted.
Now, BMJ is convening an independent expert panel to determine whether the articles should be fully retracted.
READ MORE CRESTOR LEGAL NEWS
At the time Public Citizen wrote its petition, the organization noted that Crestor had only been on the market for just more than five months.
In February 2012, the FDA expanded its advice about statin risks to include the potential for muscle damage (myopathy), a small increased risk of diabetes and rare liver injury.
Lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer, maker of another statin called Lipitor, alleging patients suffered severe health problems as a result of using the statin.
READER COMMENTS
C. Dobson
on
I did, but still experienced a few days of pins an needles in the limbs. I honestly think it would have killed me, had I stayed on it.
I can't say ENOUGH bad things about statins.
janice king
on
robert paulin
on