Miami, FLA class action Force-placed insurance lawsuit that has been on the books for some time was recently amended, but is nonetheless going forward and alleges that defendants in the case fraudulently and improperly withdrew Lender insurance premiums from the accounts of mortgagees that grossly exceeded the true costs of the lenders insurance, or so it has been alleged in the amended complaint.
Defendants in the class action are Homeward Residential (known as American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. or AHMSI, prior to 2012), the insurer QBE Insurance Corporation, the private equity firm of WL Ross & Co., and various affiliates. Allegations hold that QBE and certain affiliates had issued kickbacks and premium rebates on Force-Place Insurance masked as other transactions to Homeward, effectively lowering the true cost of what is often overpriced insurance.
However, in spite of the alleged kickbacks and premium rebates, Homeward is accused of extracting premiums representing the full cost of the Forced-place insurance from homeowner’s mortgage escrow accounts, and incorporated the allegedly inflated costs into their monthly mortgage payments.
As previously reported, the defendants are accused of concealing the alleged kickbacks and rebates as marketing services, warrants on stock, commissions and brokerage fees for what are alleged to be nonexistent brokerage services, as below:
According to court documents, it is alleged that $9.7 million was paid to Homeward (AHMSI) as purported compensation for fictitious marketing services. Warrants on QBE stock worth $135 million were issued directly to Homeward (AHMSI)'s shareholders, i.e., private equity funds managed by WL Ross, or so it is alleged. In addition, more than $16 million in allegedly fraudulent commissions for nonexistent brokerage services were purportedly provided by an affiliate of Homeward (AHMSI), together with at least $25 million in below-cost, outsourced services provided to Homeward (AHMSI) through an affiliate of QBE Insurance, or so the class-action lawsuit claims.
Forced-placed insurance has been a frustration for both homeowner and regulator alike - not insomuch as the product is a necessary evil when traditional property or hazard insurance is allowed to lapse - but how insurance providers and mortgage underwriters have often cozied up for a mutually beneficial profit and revenue environment at the expense of an often unsuspecting homeowner.
The homeowner having allowed, through either carelessness or financial hardship, hazard insurance on a mortgaged property to lapse can have no quarrel with a mortgage holder placing lender insurance on the property in order to protect the investment from potential loss.
The problem that has driven both state attorneys general and individual homeowners to file Forced-Placed Insurance Lawsuits centers on the tendency for such lender insurance to provide inferior coverage than standard insurance products, at a cost to the homeowner that is often far higher. To that end, a homeowner who has allowed a hazard insurance policy to lapse due to money problems is further stricken financially when the mortgage holder places Force-Place Insurance that is even more expensive than the lapsed policy, with inferior coverage.
The amendment to the forced-placed insurance class action was filed March 8 of this year in US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and is known as Parker et al v. AHMSI Insurance Agency, Case No. 1:15-cv-23840-JEM.
If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to an insurance lawyer who may evaluate your Force-Place Insurance claim at no cost or obligation.