An example of what can go on from both sides of the fairness ledger is best illustrated through recent events involving Unum, one of the largest insurers in the country with a 16.2 percent market share. Unum got there by being a leader in the insurance industry. But the company has also been dogged by allegations of bad faith insurance that go back years. It’s an example of behavior generally observed by all insurance companies in one form or another, typified by the blanket denial of an insurance claim unless the claimant can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the claim is legitimate.
It’s akin to the notion that any American charged with a crime is presumed guilty unless proven innocent. That’s not the way juris prudence works, which holds that an individual shall be presumed innocent unless proven guilty. The insurance industry, it seems, turns that basic tenet on its head.
That said, insurance companies get taken to the cleaners too, which can be illustrated by what recently happened to market leader Unum. Recently, detectives with the California Department of Insurance (CDI) arrested two individuals over charges of health care disability fraud. According to States News Service (3/19/15), a Los Angeles-based doctor and his adopted son, proprietors of a dermatology center, were alleged to have collected in excess of $1.8 million in disability benefits while continuing to work and practice medicine.
According to the report, Dr. Glenn Neil Ledesma submitted a disability claim to Unum in 1997 over an inability to treat patients due to a medical condition. At the time, Unum told Dr. Ledesma that in order to receive benefits he could not treat patients or practice medicine, but that he could continue to operate his clinic, California Dermatology Center Inc. The report assumes that Ledesma successfully collected disability benefits under those terms until 2008, when it has been reported that he resumed his practice while continuing to receive benefits. It has been reported that between 2008 and 2013 he collected $1,605,464 in disability benefits from Unum under false pretenses. Ledesma’s adopted son was also accused of collecting in excess of $200,000 in benefits fraudulently.
And so, it seems insurance companies get hooked too.
Yet there remain accusations of bad faith insurance and Denied Disability Claims amongst insurance providers.
READ MORE LONG TERM DISABILITY LEGAL NEWS
The bad faith insurance lawsuit claims that Unum commenced LTD payments in 2009 upon the plaintiff’s release from the hospital, only to abruptly stop benefits in 2013, claiming the plaintiff was not, in Unum’s view, disabled and thus could duly perform the duties of his occupation. The plaintiff’s appeal to Unum, in spite of sound medical evidence, was not successful.
Unum is not the only bad guy. Bad faith insurance lawsuits abound, against dozens of well-known insurers.
The plaintiff’s Long term denied disability lawsuit is Case No. 1:15-cv-00238-GJQ, in the US District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division.
READER COMMENTS
toedliche rache
on
As you well know UNUM is consistently ranked the worst and for you to take the position without even thinking before writing and condemning the purported accused makes you no better than UNUM.
As you are fully aware NOTHING UNUM does is legal. If it were they wouldn't have to pay out so many Bad Faith claims.
Nect time before you mouth off, do some digging and find the truth. Don't beleive a self-serving PRESS RELEASE from a UNUM stooge (Dave Jones the California Insurance Commissioner) who is solely grandstanding FOR UNUM and publicly destroying two people before they were even arraigned.
The only thing you got correct was "the notion that any American charged with a crime is presumed guilty unless proven innocent" and you just exonerated UNUM and the CA DOI and the LA County DA and justified their illegal actions.
Are you aware that UNUM "contributes" to Dave Jones and the CA DOI? That the CA DOI gives grant money to every CA County DA to ENSURE their DOI rent-a-cop arrests stick? Most recently the CA DOI gave the LA County DA $6.4MM - read THAT press release! Did you know that the CA DOI is so beholden to the Insurance industry thaat any consuer complaint the DOI receives, they simply forward to the Insurance co in question for a response? the usual response is "oh they're just an unhappy customer, we did nothing wrong".
Are you aware that Dave Jones, the CA DOI, Kamala Harris the CA AG AND UNUM ALL violated Federal, State, Constitutional, ADA and HIPAA laws of the people you are commenting about and 'giving one to UNUM'?
Are you aware that not only did the aforementioned violate those laws, they BLATANTLY ignored and disregarded standing California laws re the definition of disability and USED THE UNUM DEFINITION, NOT THE LEGAL DEFINITION so they could orchestrate their sham arrest?
Instead of blindly accepting what you read from a known self-serving and non-credible source, if you have any credibility you should be offering your services to help those people KNOWING what you know about UNUM , your gut should have told you that what you read didn't seem right.
Why would UNUM pay someone for 15 years if there was fraud? Simple: either there is NO FRAUD or UNUM is fabricating evience, which means THERE WAS NO FRAUD BY THE INNOCENTS...something deeper, darker and uglier is in the works and you missed it. UNUM wants to change the definition of disability in California
Thoroughly revolted at your "guilty, prove to me you're innocent" position.
david dawson
on