Employees at Hooters restaurants in North Fresno, Sacramento and Bakersfield allege that they were denied rest breaks and meal breaks and were required to cover any shortages if customers left without paying for their meals. According to a 3/16/10 Fox40 News report, servers were also forced to work off the clock and had to pay for their own uniforms.
Approximately three dozen current and former Hooters employees have joined the lawsuit.
Meanwhile, a recent ruling in the case of Rutti v. Lojack may have an impact on employee overtime in California. In this case, Rutti worked for Lojack installing car alarms. One issue addressed was whether or not commute time in a company vehicle is a compensable event. Lojack restricted Rutti's use of the company vehicle - no passengers, no personal errands and no detours between home and job.
Initially, the court ruled that time spent in a company vehicle commuting to and from work was not compensable. However, the Ninth Circuit court reversed its decision, citing a precedent in Morillon v. Royal Packing Co, in which the courts determined that commute time is compensable under certain conditions.
READ MORE CALIFORNIA OVERTIME LEGAL NEWS
This could have implications for overtime hours when employers provide their employees with company vehicles and put restrictions on their commute. Essentially, employers must either pay overtime for time spent commuting, or count it toward a regular eight-hour workday, in which case the employees might see their hours reduced. Alternatively, employers could stop providing company vehicles or lift restrictions on employees when they drive those vehicles.