Judge Ann Jones on April 20 ruled in a summary adjudication on an overtime lawsuit Maria Sanchez v. McDonald's Restaurants of California Inc. et al Case No. BC499888, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles filed by a California McDonald's worker in 2013 that McDonald's timekeeping system violated California's 24-hour workday rule used to calculate overtime hours according to Bloomberg BNA's Daily Labor Report.
A summary adjudication is a ruling by a judge that a certain issue within a lawsuit is settled and need not be tried. The trial in May will determine damages that McDonalds' must pay.
Sanchez filed the original lawsuit in January 2013, alleging wage and hour violations. The following year, three more plaintiffs joined the lawsuit, and Jones in 2016 certified a class of more than 6,000 workers related to the overnight shift overtime claim.
In this case, class plaintiffs filed a motion earlier this year that McDonald's method of calculating overtime violates the California Labor Code, which requires employers to pay one-and-a-half-times the employee's regular rate of pay for any work in excess of 12 hours in any consecutive 24-hour period at the same time each calendar day.
Class plaintiffs contended that McDonald's violated that requirement because the fast-food mammoth "configured its electronic timekeeping system to attribute all hours worked by a class member on a specific shift to the date on which that shift began rather than the date the work was actually performed," according to the ruling.
READ MORE CALIFORNIA OVERTIME LEGAL NEWS
The plaintiffs' overtime claim is based on McDonald's "failure to pay for overtime hours worked from multiple shifts in a 24-hour period, "not just a single shift spanning two days," according to court documents.
McDonald’s has estimated damages from unpaid overtime to be $400,000 while class members contend that the amount is more than $2 million, according to Bloomberg BNA's Daily Labor Report.
A trial is scheduled for May 23, 2017.