Despite studies that have linked Zofran to birth defects, the drugmaker chose to market its drug off-label to pregnant women to treat morning sickness. Zofran is only approved by the FDA for use by patients undergoing surgery or cancer treatments.Zofran lawsuits
Court records show that two Zofran lawsuits have been filed this month claiming that the drug caused children to be born with serious heart problems. A mother from Minnesota filed a lawsuit claiming she used Zofran during her pregnancies in 2004 and in 2006. Both Cheri Flynn’s children were born with serious heart defects (Case 2:15-cv-00709-PD).
Another lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, claiming a child was born with several congenital heart abnormalities. Tomesha LeClair took Zofran during her first trimester of pregnancy. LeClair’s child has undergone at least 13 different surgeries and continues to suffer from developmental delays and other health problems, according to the lawsuit, which also claims that GSK failed to warn her and her physician of this risk (Case 1:15-cv-10429).
Further, the world’s sixth-largest pharmaceutical company has been accused of bribing doctors with money and gifts to prescribe Zofran, a practice that appears to be commonplace with GSK - the number-one big pharma repeat offender. GSK since 1991 has paid a whopping $7.56 billion in criminal and civil penalties, according to Sidney M. Wolfe at Public Citizen. GSK has done its math and the cost of penalties, now likely to include Zofran birth defects lawsuits, is simply the cost of doing business.
In 2012, GSK agreed to pay $3 billion to settle a number of allegations including illegally marketing Zofran for non-approved use - but the company’s profits in that year alone were $7.7 billion.
Zofran studies
READ MORE ZOFRAN BIRTH DEFECT LEGAL NEWS
In 2012, The Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention published a study suggesting that women who used Zofran during the first trimester of pregnancy had a twofold increased risk of having a child with birth defects.
Although Zofran was not approved by the FDA for morning sickness, and despite studies linking the drug to birth defects, GSK continued to promote the use of its drug off-label.
READER COMMENTS
Cam
on
heather
on
Brigid Massey
on
briona johnson
on
Torri owens
on
Rose Price
on
melody
on
Susan
on
Crystal
on
Jordan
on
Jessica Raymond
on
J. McBride
on
Jenn T
on
niele
on
Christina
on
E.
on
Mellissa Ockerman
on
Then we realized there was something terribly wrong. Everything seemed fine until the techs started acting off. It was Spina Bifida. Talk about crushing when your doctor actually supports aborting your child. So given the choice we decided to continue! My son has undergone several surgeries for his back, bum, and head to combat all of the problems that come with Spina Bifida. I feel sick every time I think that all of his pain and suffering is due to me taking a prescription drug.
Brittany quatrevingt
on
Barbara Saavedra
on
I wonder if zofran could be the one to blame for this.
I called there number and said I don't qualify for an attorney. I need some answers.
Annette C
on
Melissa Mevis
on
louis
on
Crystal
on
Stephanie Simpson
on
Doris
on
Michelle
on
Brittany
on
Chastidie
on
S. M.
on
Nikki
on
Michelle
on