Request Legal Help Now - Free

Advertisement
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Tax Dispute

Hartford, CT: (Feb-07- 08) The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) brought charges against Magellan Petroleum Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Magellan Petroleum Australia Limited (MPAL), over an ongoing tax dispute. The recent ATO audit focused on certain income tax deductions claimed by Paroo Petroleum Pty. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of MPAL, related to the write-off of outstanding loans made by PPPL to other entities within the MPAL group of companies. As a result of this audit, in August 2007, the ATO issued position papers to MPAL which stated ATO's opinions that these previous deductions should be disallowed, resulting in additional income taxes being payable by MPAL and its subsidiaries. In the position papers, the ATO set out its legal basis for its conclusions. In its position papers, the ATO indicated that the amended tax liabilities arising from its proposed positions would be (Aus) $13,392,460 (US $12,003,930), plus possible interest and penalties, which could have exceeded the amount of the amended tax liabilities asserted by the ATO.

Sources stated that the parties reached a settlement in the matter, where Magellan Petroleum Australia Limited agreed to pay the ATO $14.6 million (US $13.1 million) to resolve the dispute. Company spokespersons stated that the settlement avoids a protracted and costly legal battle with the ATO. The Board of Directors of the Company, in consultation with its advisors and the MPAL Board, concluded that the settlement let them clear the way for progress and was, therefore, in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. [PR NEWSWIRE: TAX DISPUTE]


Legal Help

If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.
Published on Feb-8-08


ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE

Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.


Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Request Legal Help Now! - Free