We were waiting for this one. The International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery (ISHRS)—yes, there is such an organization—issued a press release earlier this week to state its position on the claims of Propecia sexual dysfunction that have been swirling around.
The ISHRS aims to quell concerns over reported Propecia side effects—namely those regarding sexual dysfunction, loss of sexual interest, and claims of infertility—by stating that there have been “no evidence-based data substantiating the link between finasteride and persistent sexual side effects after discontinued use of the drug in numerous, double blinded, placebo controlled studies conducted evaluating the use of Propecia 1mg for hair loss.”
Additionally, the ISHRS states that anecdotal reports of adverse events (as in erectile dysfunction) “should not define the safety and effectiveness of this drug”. Such a statement is reminiscent of that line about a disease being “rare” until you’re the one affected by it. True, some random report from a guy on Propecia having sexual difficulties is not perhaps indicative of a large-scale problem or cause for alarm. Unfortunately, though, the anecdotal reports are more than just a few one-off’s, and they are a cause of concern for the men who report them.
According to drugcite.com–a website that aggregates data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS), there have been 363 adverse events reported to the FDA for Finasteride (Propecia and Proscar). Of note, the most common reported Finasteride adverse event is erectile dysfunction.
The numbers seem low at first glance, but hair loss and sexual dysfunction don’t tend to be topics that anyone really wants to “come out” about and certainly not call attention to. And that raises the question of underreporting—could it be that due to the nature of the side effects not too many men really want to come forward and first, admit there is a problem to themselves, and then take it a step further and officially report it?
Given the upward trend of AERS reports from 2009 to 2011, one can only surmise that as more information regarding Propecia sexual side effects has hit the mainstream media—for example, the recent story in Men’s Health magazine—perhaps the stigma of talking about it has been reduced a bit (“see honey, it’s not me—it’s that hair loss drug I’ve been on…“).
Of note, the ISHRS release mentions that sexual dysfunction can be hard (no pun there) to assess—after all, there are numerous factors that can contribute to such problems: “nicotine, alcohol, prescription medications, stress, anxiety, fatigue and depression”. And, according the the release which quotes a 2006 study in the Archives of Internal Medicine, incidence of erectile dysfunction in middle-aged or older men in the general population can be as high as 49%.
That make sense—except when you look at the anecdotal reports from Propecia users (some of which are on LawyersandSettlements.com) and see that the victims can be rather young—in their 20’s and 30’s, some even as young as 19. So not quite in that “middle-aged or older” group.
According to AmericanHairLoss.org, “Approximately twenty five percent of men who suffer with male pattern baldness begin the painful process before they reach the age of twenty-one.” The ISHRS itself states on its site that “Hair loss in men is likely to occur primarily between late teen-age years and age 40-50″—if so, it would appear that the statistic of E.D. occurring in potentially 49% of middle-aged or older men is somewhat irrelevant.
Perhaps the most telling aspect of the ISHRS press release is the announcement that the organization has formed a task force to review the anecdotal reports of sexual dysfunction among certain Propecia users. While it’s certainly the responsible thing to do, it also somehow validates that there is growing concern over the drug’s potential for harmful side effects.
According to the release, the ISHRS has also reached out to “dermatologists, hair loss physicians, urologists, endocrinologists and sexual medicine specialists” to be a part of the task force and share their data and experiences with finasteride in a “fact-based manner”.
Undoubtedly there will be more to come—Propecia lawsuits included.
I would just like to n of any new findings about the cases
I am a disbled veteran lied to by the VA about finasteride that the VA goes out from it urologists for BPH-Enlarged Prostate. I have an FOIA act answered by VHA and VA Phamacy which shows that the VA despite FDA adverse warnings on finasteride in 2012 and 2014 the VA never put warnings on their drug labels. I was told it was 100% safe drug never given hormone blood tests by the VA and when one was done they did absolutely nothing about my hormones being messed up as part of my permanenet Post Finasteride Sympotmology -PFS adverse symptomology . The VA has stated in my medical records PFS does not exist and have refused me and tiers treatment and denied consults despite two top evaluations by leading researchers in the field of PFS .
Although I had full blown symptomology before 2012 ( took the drug between 2009 and 2014 as ordered as a safe drug by my VA uriologist) I ad a incompetent PFS case action lawyer who actually sued the wrong company as an Indian Company made my Generic finasterdie not Merck . He supposed expert as well as the class actions expert was not allowed to talk with him. The plaintiffs so called expert threw out from the class action anyone who took finasteride , proscar or procepia (despite having full blow symptomology and ones doctor stated it was 100% safe drug as the VA has stated in writing ) past 2012 when the FDA came out with the first warnings .
Thus anyone who took finasteride , proscar, or procepia past FDA warnings, even if there were none on your bottle like the VA pharmacy , past FDA warning of 2012 are thrown out of the class action or court and none will help us veterans . Not one lawyer so we cant get treatment from what the VA did to us and has lied about the drug anmd still lies about the drug refusing to recognize PFS claiming that there is no adesre symptomology as all symptom logy goes away onc you cease the drug. VA doctors and facials have also stated besides this verbally that all PFS doctors are bogus, the research is bogus , and there is not such a thing as PFS . Lawyers have refused to take our case for discrimination of a recognized disability, failure to report one case of PFS at the VA despite millions given this drug (They lie and tell vets its all due to your enlarged prostate or hormones being messed up to begin with or your mental health diagnosis kept in check for years) for enlarged prostate. This is millions of veterans . This discrimination by the VA in the form of medical neglect and medical malpractice goes on and on and who knows the numbers of vets committing suicde and are in pain like myself every day with no help.
So anyone who took finasteride proscar or procepia past the FDA warning of 2012 or continued to take such drug has no case period .according to the class action lawyers for finasteride. Many were lied to to take such cases and over 80% were throne out by the plaintiffs expert for this reason and not allowed to talk with plaintiffs expert like myself and others .
If you will look at the internet and this site no lawyer is taking any PFS finasteride, proscar or procepia cases period. Try to find an attorney who will do so !!
you can get me at :
Need help legally to sue the drug company and the Veterans Adminsitrations doctors and personnel.
Veteran