Who ya gonna call? Well, if you’ve had an ADT alarm system installed, you’re proababy thinking you don’t need to call anyone if someone should break into your home. After all, ADT is supposed to be right on it, detecting a break-in and alerting the police who should then get to your home more quickly than if you had detected the break-in yourself and tried to dial 911.
Right?
Unfortunately, a for a couple in Minnesota, things didn’t turn out that way. Their ADT alarm system failed—when they needed it most.
In 2006, Teri Lee had been afraid that her ex-boyfriend, Steven Van Keuren, might cause trouble—he’s the reason why she purchased an ADT system for her home. Sadly, Lee’s worst fears came true when Van Keuren entered Lee’s home and shot both her and her new boyfriend, Timothy Hawkinson. Both Lee and Hawkinson died.
Lee’s estate filed a lawsuit against ADT, and recently reached a confidential settlement.
Loss of life by murder is surely what we’d hope would be a freak accident as the alleged result of an alarm system failure. But it’s not all that far out there to envision, is it?… A break-in happens…should be your run-of-the-mill burglary…maybe the thief is looking for some jewelry, or cash…but maybe he finds the homeowner instead…unexpectedly. The outcome could be all the same—death—except legally we just call it different things…it’s a matter of degrees.
But what if it could’ve been prevented? What if there were a reasonable expectation—heck, a contractual expectation—that an installed alarm system should function properly and the would-be victim were still alive? No alarm system that touts itself as your security blanket and knight in shining armor should fail in your hour of need.
Over the past year and a half, LawyersandSettlements.com has received a number of complaints from individuals stating that their ADT alarm systems failed—or that the ADT response time was inadequate. Thankfully, they are all alive to tell their stories.
And, if we go back to 2007, there actually had been a lawsuit filed against ADT alleging slow response times—and it was seeking class action status.
If you were affected by the CertainTeed Organic Shingle Class Action, listen up.
We’ve gotten a very high number of complaints about CertainTeed shingles—in fact, we continue to get them. But if you purchased, installed—or even took on ownership of a home with defective CertainTeed Organic Shingles—and the shingles failed prematurely or did not perform in accordance with reasonable expectations, you may still be able to submit a claim form over at the CertainTeed Organic Shingle Class Action Settlement website. (Please note: do not submit a complaint here at LawyersandSettlements.com.)
To be sure, figuring out what type of shingles you have, when they were installed, how long the shingle warranty is, and how that all figures into if and when you need to submit a claim form by is no easy task. But the claims administrator has provided a chart showing the various warranty lengths for each of the CertainTeed Organic Shingle types (Custom Lok 25, Custom Saf-T-Lok/Saf-T-Lok, Custom Sealdon, Custom Sealdon 30, Hallmark Shangle, Hearthstead, Horizon, Shangle, Independence Shangle, Master Slab, Sealdon 20, Sealdon 25, Solid Slab).
Once you review the chart showing you what your warranty length is for your shingles, you can then determine when you either needed to submit a claim by (some claim submission dates have already passed) or if you still may be able to file a claim.
IMPORTANT: If you are not covered by the warranty or if you settled your warranty claim since August 1, 2006, your claim form must be postmarked or otherwise received by CertainTeed within 12 months after the effective settlement date of October 2, 2010.
If this applies to YOU—it’s last call for making a claim in the CertainTeed Organic Shingle Settlement—your claim form needs to be postmarked by October 2, 2011 (Sunday). So get moving!
Visit the CertainTeed Organic Shingle Class Action Settlement website for more info.
Kellogg’s Rice Krispies—and Cocoa Krispies—cereals are the focus of a class action lawsuit settlement. Granted, the Class Period for this lawsuit isn’t all that long: it’s for Rice Krispies or Cocoa Krispies bought between June 1, 2009 and March 1, 2010. But, as any mom with school-age kids could tell you, between bowls at breakfast and the ever-popular Rice Krispies treats (homemade, of course), there’s a good chance that a lot of folks—including you—are part of the Class for this one.
So here’s the lowdown on the Kellogg’s Rice Krispies class action settlement…
False advertising. How? The plaintiff claimed that Kellogg Company made claims about Rice Krispies’ and Cocoa Krispies’ supporting a person’s immunity system (see pic)—without having competent clinical evidence to support the claim. (Personally, I’d be seeking other ways to boost my immunity, but what do I know…). Kellogg denies any wrongdoing, however the company and Class Representatives agreed to settle to avoid the cost of a trial.
Anyone who purchased Rice Krispies or Cocoa Krispies in the US between June 1, 2009 and March 1, 2010 is considered part of the Class.
A settlement fund of $2.5 million has been set up. Claimants will share in the amount left over once attorney fees and an incentive award for Class Representatives have been paid from the settlement fund.
Accordingly, Class Members may then seek reimbursement of $5 per box purchased, up to a maximum of $15 (i.e., 3 boxes) per household. As is typical with class action lawsuits, the actual amount claimant receives will depend on how many valid claims are received for this class action. If valid claims exceed the amount of money available to pay them, then each award will be reduced pro rata.
You need to fill out and submit a claim form by November 16, 2011. Proof of purchase is not required (but your honesty is).
For full details on the Kellogg’s Rice Krispies and Cocoa Krispies class action lawsuit, visit www.cerealadvertisingsettlement.com.
The video above, which shows some broken Ford spark plugs–or more specifically, broken spark plugs from a 2004 Ford F150 Triton 5.4L V8–also shows what the recent Ford spark plug class action lawsuit is all about. A quick surf around the internet found that Ford owners who’ve had this problem have paid bills of a few hundred dollars to $750 to $4,500 and who knows how much more to get the spark plug problem fixed.
So what’s the deal with the Ford spark plug class action lawsuit? Here’s the lowdown…
The Ford spark plug lawsuit claims that spark plugs in certain Ford models break during replacement. As a result, broken pieces or fragments of the defective spark plugs get stuck in the cylinder head, which has led to expensive repair shop bills in order to remove the broken spark plug pieces and/or repair damage to engines. The Ford spark plug class action lawsuit is a defective product lawsuit.
Ford did issue a Technical Service Bulletin (08-7-6) in 2008 which provided instruction (11 pages!) on how to properly remove the spark plugs.
The “class” for this lawsuit would include owners of the following Ford, Lincoln and Mercury models:
Ford
Lincoln
Mercury
Fill out and submit your complaint form.
With the recent FDA approval of the DePuy Pinnacle CoMplete Acetabular Hip, we thought it might be helpful to put it all down on an infographic that shows the different types of hip implant components and which one has been the target of hip replacement lawsuits. Find more information on the metal-on-metal (MoM) DePuy ASR hip replacement here.