If you’ve read the news lately, you may have heard that GlaxoSmithKline agreed to settle approximately 700 Avandia lawsuits for a reported $60 million. You may also have heard the calls to end the Avandia safety trial known as the TIDE trial. This may have you concerned about how these developments affect you, and rightfully so.
This week, Pleading Ignorance takes a look at how the Avandia settlement and the controversy over the Avandia and Actos TIDE trial may affect you.
GlaxoSmithKline has reportedly agreed to settle 700 lawsuits for approximately $60 million. How this settlement affects you depends on where you are in the lawsuit process, if you are involved at all.
Obviously, if you’re one of the 700 lawsuits that have been settled, then your lawsuit is now done; you’ll receive your share of the settlement and no longer have to worry about the litigation.
If you are one of the remaining lawsuits (reported to number in the thousands), how this settlement affects you is less clear. Details about the settlement have been kept quiet. Based on how big businesses operate, my guess (this is just speculation here) is that GlaxoSmithKline has not admitted to any wrongdoing (something most businesses attach to their settlements). The settlement, however, shows that the drug maker is willing to sit down with plaintiff’s lawyers to negotiate, which could be a good thing for the remaining lawsuits.
That said, there is no guarantee that a settlement in those 700 initial lawsuits will translate into a settlement for the remaining lawsuits. It’s a good sign, but it’s no guarantee.
If you are considering contacting a lawyer but haven’t done so yet, the statute of limitations might be running out for you. One of the things that plays into how much time you have to file is whether or not your state follows a discovery rule. What’s that? Basically, it’s the point in time in which an individual would have likely been aware that a claim could be made against a defendant—or that a claim existed. In the case of Avandia, that would mean the point at which a person most likely knew they suffered an injury related to taking Avandia—the point at which Avandia users became aware that Avandia had been linked to heart attacks. GSK has put that date at May 2007. Plaintiffs’ lawyers have disagreed stating that the date was actually later. Why does it matter? Because for states that follow a discovery rule, that date of discovery marks the time at which the clock starts ticking for an Avandia lawsuit’s statute of limitations.
The Avandia statute of limitations will vary by state—as it will with regard to filing any lawsuit—but rather than take chances it might be best for you to contact an attorney sooner than later. An attorney can tell you for sure if you have a case, rather than you wondering for the rest of your life if you might have had a case.
Also in the news lately are the calls from critics to put an end to the TIDE (Thiazolidinedione Intervention in Vitamin D Evaluation) trial, which compares Avandia’s safety to the safety of rival drug Actos. The basis for the argument to end the trial is that the trial puts participants’ safety at risk by having them be on a medication that could be harmful when a less harmful drug exists (the critics say).
So far, the trial has not been stopped, although the FDA is reportedly considering the matter and will make a decision after a July advisory committee meeting.
If you’ve read about the TIDE trial, you might be concerned about how taking Avandia affects you. After all, critics are saying that the risk of harm to patients makes the study unethical. There is no easy answer about what to do.
All I can say is that if you are currently taking Avandia and are concerned about it, you should speak to your doctor. Do not stop taking Avandia on your own. Your doctor can advise you about what you should do and can discuss the risks versus the benefits of continuing Avandia.
It should be noted that as critics call for the halt of this clinical trial, GSK is struggling to even find willing participants for TIDE. Given all the bad news regarding Avandia lately, I'm not surprised.
I can personally attest to the dangers of avandia as compared to actos as I am currently taking actos and have had no ill effects since I started taking it especially after having sufferered a stroke and losing part of my eye sight while on avandia the year and a half previously back in May of 2007. And which has left me disabled. It needs to be taken off the market.
Hi Raul, Sounds like a pretty bad experience with Avandia. Just curious–did you file a claim?
I took Avanda and told my doctor it made my heart skipped and tried to see D r.At his office and later Dr quit seeing me. and i was told got to emergency room and another Doctor took me off avanda. Fast heart rate to emergency room 3 x in one week . Heart rate over 260 Then i had have an ablasion. And later stents. i don't have the energy i used to have . It changes your life forever. And another Dr put me on actos and now i am on a different pill and insulin.
Hi Juanita, I'm sorry to hear about all you've been through since starting Avandia. We've heard from quite a number of folks who've had bad experiences with Avandia–and also Actos. There are lawyers who are reviewing patient claims regarding Avandia side effects and if you'd like, you can submit a claim for review at this link: https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/submit_form…
My doctor started me on AvandaMet in Oct. 2007. I stopped taking it in April 2009. In September 2010 I suffered a TIA whcih was diagnosed by my neurologist at the VA. There has never been any instance of strokes in my family history and I was prescribed AvandaMet even though my doctor knew of my heart attack in 1997 which required a stent implant in my right coronary artery. I finally filed a claim after hearing a commercial on the dangers of Avandia associated with strokes whcih I had never heard before (only heard about heart issues). The attorney's accepted my case and I'm awaiting the outcome.
Jack
My Dr,, never warned me of the ban or the Drug Avandia/ Avandiamet is not good , I was given scrips since 2004, and used it till I had a stroke,01/01/2007, was hospitalised for 2 months, & now have no use of my left sideof my body, filed a claim ,2009, and not hearing from my lawyers, I was told, the defence has my case, & waiting the outcome.
I recieved an 80% settlement on my avandia case after waiting 7yrs. My defense said GSK was holding the other 20% until my medicaid settle for there portion. I think they put a cap on it of $10,000. It has been about 6mo. Do you know anything about this issue? Please answer. Thank you
Hi Daniel, You'll have to follow up with your attorney on this–LawyersandSettlements.com would not have information on the terms of a specific individual's settlement agreement–so best to contact your lawyer.
We also are waiting Daniel. It's been over a year for us, and we are still waiting. Something is not right here.
Avandia has not paid settlements on the 700 as listed. My husband is one of them. He was paid half the money then told there was a hold up. Some judge has put a hold on the balance to be paid to the plaintiff's.We have heard time and time again for over a year now that nothing has changed, the money is still in limbo.So to correct the record, nothing has been settled.
we received part of the settlement to pending the medicare/Medicaid holdback, even though we did not have medicare/Medicaid. my husband passed away last month from heart failure at 56 and they tell me no you cant sue for that. his heart gradually got weaker and weaker since taking Avandia and having a heart attack in 07.
scott&white did the surgery…Avandia and heart failure etc
ttpay my bills and no smoke/drugs/alcohol…restricted in all areas..turned 70 in august. and filled aii thepaper work…talkabout 2 more months but no check…retired 45 yrs law enforcement
every thing is beautiful..going back to work part time
My family and I have put our case in to a law firm. Everytime I have called and asked about the Avandia lawsuit but they keep telling me they have not come to a settlement yet. Personally I think the law firm will get most of the money. We lost my mother!! Not that any amount of money can replace her. But she suffered not them.