How many people would have sex on a business trip, get injured while having sex, and then have the b#lls to file a worker’s compensation claim?
Not many, most likely.
There is one person, however—in Australia. We don’t know her name—that’s under lock and key—”for legal reasons”, but we do know that she was in her thirties, worked for the government, and she was hospitalized (hospitalized? what the heck were they doing?) for injuries sustained while having sex with a “male friend” in a hotel room during a business trip back in 2007.
Ok, we actually do know what they were doing… It seems that while they were going at it, a light fixture above the bed got torn from its mounting fixture—hey, it happens. And, when it came crashing down, it landed smack on the woman’s face. Party over.
Well, that led to her nose and mouth getting injured, along with one of her teeth. And that then led to her later suffering from depression, which then led to her inability to keep working at her government job.
Talk about a double whammy: lousy sex & no money. Sounds more like some sort of 20-something angst-ridden movie trailer than the plight of a 30-something would-be gainfully employed government worker. The 30-year old had an ace up her sleeve though: she filed a worker’s compensation claim—and initially, it had been approved.
Surprise, surprise, the approval was then reversed after further investigation into the worker comp claim.
According to the Mercury News, an administrative tribunal reviewing the details of the woman’s worker’s comp claim determined that her injuries had not been incurred “in the course of her employment”. And here’s the part that we all would’ve loved to have been a fly on the wall to witness being resolved–the tribunal’s conclusion that the sex was ‘”not an ordinary incident of an overnight stay” such as such as showering, sleeping and eating’.
Now, you’d think that would’ve been the end of it. And that’s where a serious set of b#lls comes into the picture; most folks would’ve quietly walked away, not wanting to risk further embarrassment. But no.
See, the law—regardless of what country you’re in—can work in mysterious ways and as such, after going through an appeal, the woman’s claim is now eligible for worker’s compensation benefits.
Yes, a federal judge—Judge John Nicholas—disagreed with the tribunal’s earlier stance that the sex needed to be condoned by the government in order for the claimant to qualify for compensation. Yes! She was able to claim that getting hurt while having consensual sex on a business trip—while working for the government mind you, not the ‘adult entertainment’ industry—entitles her to worker’s comp benefits.
Perplexed? Here’s the gist of Judge Nicholas’ decision: “If the applicant had been injured while playing a game of cards in her motel room, she would be entitled to compensation even though it could not be said that her employer induced her to engage in such activity.’
And, three other judges supported his decision.
No word yet on how much compensation the woman will be entitled to, or whether an appeal is to follow…
My question here, entirely omitted from this write-up, is did the sex CAUSE the chandelier to fall? If not, the decision is clearly correct—she'd have been hurt in her bed regardless of what she was doing there when the chandelier fell. The sex is colorful but irrelevant. If her lover was hanging from the chandelier, perhaps that's a different story. Then again, perhaps not: Was the lover a coworker?
Hi Ray, Kudos to you for truly parsing the details of this story! From the reports we'd seen we can't say for sure that anyone was literally hanging from the light fixture, but the gentleman involved had been quoted as saying things like they were going at it pretty hard–it's hard to know what exactly that involved. Rest assured, however, if the light fixture magically came off its base, with no relation to the sexual antics, then that surely would've been presented in arguments by the woman's attorney, no? We also do not know if this gentleman–only dubbed a 'male friend'–was a co-worker or client or vendor or…whatever.
INJUSTICE GONE MAD! Let me get this straight~ This woman got paid STEADY INCOME BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR having SEX ON THE JOB, and will now be paid PERMANENT INCOME BY THE GOVERNMENT for being injured while having sex on the job as an employee of the GOVERNMENT and condoned by the LEGAL SYSTEM, yet any non-government employee (i.e. citizen in society) may not receive ANY form of income from non-government sources (i.e. person in society) for having sex on the job (i.e. prostitution) AND will be prosecuted by the legal system! A double reward for govt. employees or a double screwing for all non-govt. employees!
-Cheri Woods
Author, Death Row Madam: Exposing sex and drugs in the entertainment industry