Posts Tagged ‘ BP ’

BP Oil Spill Fix #13 – Psychological Warfare?

June 17th, 2010. By AbiK

Here’s an idea on how to fix the BP Oil Spill: hit ’em where it hurts. It’s like some sort of psychological warfare tactic whereby winning the war comes not by committing excessive force on the ground (or in this case, in the water) but by playing mind games—finding your opponent’s mental weak spot. Though this one lacks the imagery conjured up by, say, being forced to listen to non-stop bagpipe music, I’m sure many of you would enjoy seeing it none the less. Robert P. seems pretty confident he’s found the solution—and I tend to agree with him. Here’s what he has to say:

Fix the BP Oil Spill Idea #13

“Start charging the management of BP personally one million dollars a day. If this was charged to them today it would be fixed tomorrow morning.”

Short, sweet and effective. Exemplary use of emotional intelligence. And, not only preemptive but also highly punitive. A two-birds-with-one-stone kind of solution.

Got an idea you’d like to share? Let us know. Or email our editor at .

Thanks Robert P.!

Tags: BP, BP Oil Spill
Posted in Emerging Issues, Environment | No Comments »

BP Oil Spill Fix #12 – Expanding Sealant

June 17th, 2010. By AbiK

This one’s sort of like a virtual brainstorming session. Scott P. sent in a follow-up idea on how to fix the mess in the Gulf by adding onto a previously submitted idea (Fix the BP Oil Spill Idea #7, to be precise). As a refresher, this was what Caleb had said then:

“I believe that capping the well permanently is a very viable idea. In Geotechnical Engineering a technique for oceanic foundations design utilizes Suction Piles. They are very large cylinders which are floated to locations, filled with water, sunken into place, water is pumped out, and they are “sucked” down into the ocean bottom. They are large cylinders which could be used to cap the area which is discharging excessive volumes of crude oil into the gulf. This is a relatively expensive process, but with the bounds that have been made and the relatively low success rate, I think that some sort of Suction Pile retrofit would be a possible solution.”

This is what Scott P. now adds for consideration as a fix for the BP Oil Spill disaster…

Fix the BP Oil Spill Idea #12

“The other option is to maintain the cap size, retro fit them with quick connect couplers, just like you see on air guns. Possibly suck some of the water out of the caps. Through the quick connect couplers inject urethane grout. It is water activated, expands like “Stuff” that you use in your home to seal air gaps. Same concept. The thought is it would expand and eventually into the leak itself (path of least resistance once the cap was filled). The cap would obviously have to be permanent.
 
Possible drawbacks, at 5000 feet would the water temp be so cold that the urethane may not activate? Another unknown is the effect of the oily water on urethane. In my applications the water source was always natural groundwater that we would try to prevent from leaking. But just a idea, a expert in urethane could answer those questions and along with a engineer on site could decide if this even has a chance of working.”

Got an idea you’d like to share? Let us know. Or email our editor at .

Thanks Scott P.!

Tags: BP, BP Oil Spill
Posted in Environment | No Comments »

BP Disaster and Why the Jones Act Needs to Change

June 16th, 2010. By Kristine B

As the oil continues to make its way to shore, countless families try to cope with the economic impact of the BP oil spill. Meanwhile scores of birds and other animals that rely on the sea are dying in unprecedented numbers. But, it may be the deaths of the 11 men on the oil rig platform that could have the biggest impact on future oil drilling. If officials change US Maritime Law—which they should, it’s only right—BP could be forced to pay dearly for its alleged (yes, I’m still using alleged here) role in the oil rig explosion and deaths of the workers.

This week, Pleading Ignorance looks at US Maritime Law and the Jones Act to better understand what happens when a worker suffers injury or death while working on or for a sea-faring vessel or operation.

So, why does US Maritime Law need changing? The current situation is that under maritime law, families of people who die while working at sea are only able to sue for economic damages caused by the death. This includes things such as loss of income, medical bills and so on. They can’t sue for punitive damages. 

The problem is that it’s the punitive damages that hit home with companies like BP—and drive much needed change. Economic damages, in comparison, are relatively small. Here’s an example: say an oil rig worker makes $60,000 a year at the time of his death and still has an approximate Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: BP, BP Oil Spill
Posted in Pleading Ignorance | No Comments »

BP Oil Spill Fix (#11) – Interim Containment Theory?

June 16th, 2010. By AbiK

I’m somehow thinking that the $20 billion that BP’s agreed to set up as an escrow fund to pay for claims as a result of the BP Oil Spill disaster won’t be enough. But I suppose it’s a start. Meanwhile reports yesterday indicated that government officials actually increased the estimates on how much oil has been spewing into the Gulf—now 50% higher than what was previously estimated. That’s a lot of oil folks…

So today we hear from Nate, who has a sort of interim containment solution to recommend. Here’s what he says…

Fix the BP Oil Spill Idea #11

“Burning the oil/gas mix at the bottom of the ocean by injecting O2 or (other gas) through the top via the q4000. Not sure if its been thought of yet, and it’s only a temp solution to oil reaching the surface till the relief wells finish. Pollution differences would have to be addressed but it would not allow oil to the surface and MOST pollution would be stuck a mile down in a tight location in theory.”

Got an idea you’d like to share? Let us know. Or email our editor at .

Thanks Nate!

Tags: BP, BP Oil Spill
Posted in Environment | No Comments »

Is BP guilty of Organized Crime?

June 15th, 2010. By LucyC

An interesting lawsuit was filed this week, a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act of 1970) accusing BP of manipulating government agencies during guess who’s administration—yep—that would be George W’s—into relaxing the regulatory oversight of offshore drilling and oil operations in the US. And the resulting lack of oversight is what has led to the environmental disaster playing out in the Gulf of Mexico, its surrounding beaches and wetlands and the economies they collectively stimulate. Not to mention the death of 11 people who worked on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig.

According to an article on PNJ.com, the lawsuit states, “In the greedy interest of billions of dollars in offshore drilling profits, BP chose to misrepresent its capability to respond and prevent impact to the environment, the public and the plaintiffs, and concealed its incapacity to response.”

Now RICO came about as a means to fight organized crime networks including the mafia. I have to say I find the analogy interesting: in a time when the free market economy has come to stand for everything the West believes is sacred, at what point does the pursuit of bottom line interests cross the line, so to speak? And, if the officials elected to safeguard the systems that enable a free market economy to operate, (albeit in a somewhat utopian way), allow themselves to be manipulated as is implied Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: BP, BP Oil Spill
Posted in Environment | No Comments »