KWTX.com reported it. The article about the car accident in Texas was only about 130 words. That’s it. And while a car accident is never something to be viewed with nonchalance, this one, as car accidents go, was pretty much your standard head-on collision–and thankfully, only one person of seven involved sustained injury (reportedly non-life threatening) of any sort.
So why am I even talking about it? Because it highlights a new age of “discovery” in the world of everyday car accidents. This accident, which happened on FM 2484 in Harker Heights, TX—sort of midway between Dallas and San Antonio—sparked 18 comments within approximately 24 hours.
Some of those comments were, of course, from well-wishers who were just thankful that all involved were generally “ok”. Some were from wannabe grammarians—always a few ’em out there… But the comments that caught my eye were these:
So I live nowhere near Harker Heights, TX—heck, I don’t even live near the state of Texas, but from reading the comments I can pretty much make out a few things:
Now, even though some of these commenters claim to have actually seen the accident, who knows if these eyewitness accounts (and in some instances, musings) reflect reality? When an accident occurs, you and the other driver (if they stay around) are usually the only ones at the scene and eyewitnesses can be hard to come by—particularly if you’re not on Main Street, Anytown, USA. Get on a highway and folks just aren’t stopping in the shoulder to offer up eyewitness accounts and their contact info for that police report.
But now, that all changes.
Imagine getting into an accident, coming home, and clicking on the local news site (just after clicking away from your insurer’s site, of course) only to find you’ve been indicted by a bunch of nowhere-to-be-seen-at-the-time onlookers? It makes you wonder, too, as that insurance claim is about to be processed, just who else is “researching” the accident via the local court of online public opinion?
I don’t know about you, but I was never one to get a lawyer for a car accident. Thankfully, I’ve never had to. But after reading these comments—and hey, they’re “free speech”—regardless of whether they’re accurate or not—the word “lawyer” might start popping into my brain…
Really interesting post. It's amazing with the use of the internet how fast news travels, especially when it comes to car accidents. I think you raise a valid point – if these minor accidents are being posted online (be it in the local news or somewhere else) and people are commenting on the story claiming to have seen the accident, etc, does that equal a valid testimony? And is it a good way to try and see if anyone saw your accident if maybe you couldn't get a statement from anyone at the time? Either way, I would definitely get a lawyer if I was involved in the case you're talking about – someone who can advise you as to what exactly is legal and will hold up in court.