What? The uber-hip, ultra-prep and ubiquitous Abercrombie & Fitch is at the center of an EEOC Complaint re: banning a Muslim employee from wearing her hijab (aka head scarf, for those of you less “hip” to all things diverse). Perish the thought!
Say it isn’t so, but oh, it’s true! Seems the Brand is the Look, and the Look is All-American-prep and so—you know, by that theory of transitivity you learned in prep school—well, the Brand is All-American-prep. Like complete mirror image. And we know brand integrity is Everything. Cap E intended.
Abercrombie & Fitch lost me a number of years ago—they used to be this quiet, reserved, quality outfitter with a store nestled in the upper recesses of Trump Tower on 5th in NYC. But then things changed. With folks like J. Crew eating up market share, well, A & F apparently found themselves in need of a re-image. Repositioning. ReBranding.
Rebrand—and expand with companies like Hollister—they did. Go into a store now and you’ll be greeted by a sea of 20-something oneness and assimiliation set to the backdrop of glaring music. Their black & white ads suggest a more “knowing” (yes, sexually) and somewhat monied and genteel crowd that I imagine the sales side of the biz only wishes it could duplicate on the sales floor. But there’s the rub. It can’t.
See, you can homogenize your ad campaign. Not so your sales staff.
So what happens when brand image isn’t playing out at the stores, or in this particular case on the stockroom floor of A&F subsidiary brand Hollister? If you’re a district manager who clearly didn’t read the page dedicated to “Diversity” on the company’s website (read excerpt below), you tell your employee that her hijab doesn’t fit the company’s look (sexy sepia!) and send her home.
But Umme-Hani Kahn—a year shy of entering that 20-something group—apparently came back to work this past Monday wearing the head scarf. See, she was trying to remain true to her religious beliefs during work hours. Well, as we know, the “look” is apparently Everything when you’re stocking inventory at Hollister—remember—the BRAND—so she was fired.
Long story short, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) filed a complaint on Wednesday. According to an article in The National Law Journal, Kahn was told at the beginning of her employment last October that she could wear the hijab. She was also told that it was ok “as long as it’s white, gray or Navy blue”—remember, the BRAND. The article also states that this complaint comes only five months after the EEOC filed suit against A&F over a similar complaint.
Oh, and here’s the that part about Diversity on the company website:
At Abercrombie & Fitch we are committed to increasing and leveraging the diversity of our associates and management across the organization. Those differences will be supported by a culture of inclusion, so that we better understand our customers, enhance our organizational effectiveness, capitalize on the talents of our workforce and represent the communities in which we do business.
Key words: “Those differences will be supported by a culture of inclusion, so that we better understand our customers…”.
Guess by that theory of transitivity—the one from prep school, remember?—A&F must not have any Muslim customers. Or maybe they won’t, now.
I think Abercrobie has every right to fire this person refusing to take off her religious scarf. I find those scarf's offensive and don't like to even pass someone on the street none the less a sales person. You need to leave your religious preferences at the alter.
Hi Michele, Well, can't say that I agree with you–but hey, everyone has a right to their opinion. What's interesting with this one is not so much that the employee is Islamic or wears a hijab, but that she was hired in the first place and told initially–at least according to all the reports–that she could wear it–so long as it was the "right" color. Kind of hard to accept someone on certain grounds and then reject them on the very same grounds that you seemingly accepted them on. A couple of things I am curious about though in reference to your comment…first, is it only a hijab that you find offensive–or is it also like, a yarmulke or a cross on a necklace or ashes on the forehead on Ash Wednesday, or those little fish people put on the backs of their cars or WWJD t-shirts or a Star of David–or, I'm wondering how you react to passing a group of Hare Krishna's on the street (does George Harrison's "My Sweet Lord" cause you to twitch–?). Just asking. Then, you indicate that one should leave their religious preferences at the alter–or "altar" as would be the case in my religion; does that mean that, say, companies shouldn't give employees off for Christmas and Good Friday–and that those should be taken as vacation days? Again, just asking.
I don't care for the scarfs either but I understand it is due to their religious teaching. I would love to see their hair, but I do understand. It is a shame that it is 2010 and we still don't get it. People are People and we need each other. This employee has every right to earn a living and a scarf should be no cause to take her job away. I heard of many stupid reasons but this one takes the cake.
Hi Rue, Thanks for your comment–you summed it up nicely by saying "People are People". I was actually in a major retailer yesterday (no, not Hollister or Abercrombie & Fitch) and took note of a saleswoman wearing a hijab, and also of two shoppers wearing them. They were certainly in the minority but everyone just went about their business just fine and it was hard not to reflect on the seemingly ridiculous-ness of the Holllister situation.