LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
Alaska Communications Faces National Overtime Violations Class Action
Anchorage, AK: An employment class and collective action lawsuit has been filed in U.S. District Court in Anchorage against Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc., and Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc., (Alaska Communications) on behalf of former employee Laura Lee Peterson and all other similarly situated sales and marketing employees. The complaint details Alaska Communications' serious and longstanding violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Alaska Wage and Hour Act (AWHA). Attorneys from Sanford Wittels & Heisler LLP in San Francisco and Lee Holen Law Office in Anchorage are representing the plaintiffs.
"Alaska Communications is one of the state's largest telecommunications companies, which has systematically denied its sales and marketing employees basic overtime pay required under federal and state law, while racking up more than $125 million in operating profit last year alone," said Janette Wipper, a partner at Sanford Wittels & Heisler and a lead lawyer for Peterson and the class. "Alaska Communications willfully continues to retain the overtime wages owed to these employees despite the Alaska Department of Labor's unambiguous finding that Ms. Peterson was entitled to overtime pay."
Peterson, a resident of Anchorage, worked for Alaska Communications for almost eight years, from 2003 until mid-2011, first as a market analyst, and later in sales positions of Business Development Manager and Senior Manager of Carrier Sales. During her entire period of employment, the company deprived her of overtime pay by misclassifying her as an exempt employee. During typical workweeks at Alaska Communications, she worked more than 60 hours, without any overtime compensation.
"Federal and state overtime laws were designed, in part, to serve the compelling societal goal of reducing unemployment by giving employers a disincentive to concentrate work in a few overburdened hands and an incentive to instead hire additional employees." said Chaya Mandelbaum of Sanford Wittels & Heisler. "In today's economic climate, the importance of insuring that big companies like Alaska Communications are not able to avoid the incentive to hire by illegally requiring their employees to work overtime hours without pay cannot be overstated. It's a lose-lose situation for its employees and the Alaska workforce."
After reviewing Peterson's overtime wage claim, in November 2011 the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development determined that she was not an exempt employee of Alaska Communications and was entitled to unpaid overtime compensation and liquidated damages; however, the company has refused to abide by that determination.
Peterson's complaint asserts federal overtime claims on behalf of all Alaska Communications employees who worked in a sales or marketing position below the level of Vice President anywhere in the United States from April 30, 2009 until the date of judgment. In addition, she is seeking to recover overtime wages under Alaska's state law for herself and a class of Alaska Communications sales and marketing employees who have worked for the company in Alaska at any time between April 30, 2010 and the date of judgment.
Published on Apr-30-12
"Alaska Communications is one of the state's largest telecommunications companies, which has systematically denied its sales and marketing employees basic overtime pay required under federal and state law, while racking up more than $125 million in operating profit last year alone," said Janette Wipper, a partner at Sanford Wittels & Heisler and a lead lawyer for Peterson and the class. "Alaska Communications willfully continues to retain the overtime wages owed to these employees despite the Alaska Department of Labor's unambiguous finding that Ms. Peterson was entitled to overtime pay."
Peterson, a resident of Anchorage, worked for Alaska Communications for almost eight years, from 2003 until mid-2011, first as a market analyst, and later in sales positions of Business Development Manager and Senior Manager of Carrier Sales. During her entire period of employment, the company deprived her of overtime pay by misclassifying her as an exempt employee. During typical workweeks at Alaska Communications, she worked more than 60 hours, without any overtime compensation.
"Federal and state overtime laws were designed, in part, to serve the compelling societal goal of reducing unemployment by giving employers a disincentive to concentrate work in a few overburdened hands and an incentive to instead hire additional employees." said Chaya Mandelbaum of Sanford Wittels & Heisler. "In today's economic climate, the importance of insuring that big companies like Alaska Communications are not able to avoid the incentive to hire by illegally requiring their employees to work overtime hours without pay cannot be overstated. It's a lose-lose situation for its employees and the Alaska workforce."
After reviewing Peterson's overtime wage claim, in November 2011 the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development determined that she was not an exempt employee of Alaska Communications and was entitled to unpaid overtime compensation and liquidated damages; however, the company has refused to abide by that determination.
Peterson's complaint asserts federal overtime claims on behalf of all Alaska Communications employees who worked in a sales or marketing position below the level of Vice President anywhere in the United States from April 30, 2009 until the date of judgment. In addition, she is seeking to recover overtime wages under Alaska's state law for herself and a class of Alaska Communications sales and marketing employees who have worked for the company in Alaska at any time between April 30, 2010 and the date of judgment.
Alaska Communications National Overtime Violations Class Action Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.Published on Apr-30-12
READ MORE Employment Settlements and Legal News