LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
Santander Consumer USA TCPA Violations
By Jane Mundy
Santander Consumer USA recently faced a TCPA class action lawsuit over alleged Telephone Consumer Protection Act violations as well as violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The lawsuit also alleges Santander breached its own contracts by charging improper fees. Santander Consumer USA and TCPA Violations Santander Consumer USA, which operates in the automotive finance sector, is accused of using heavy-handed tactics—that allegedly violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)— to get consumers to pay their loans. These tactics allegedly include making repeated and harassing calls to plaintiffs' phones. Early in 2017, the US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case regarding the question of whether a bank that purchases delinquent debts and begins collecting on those debts can be held liable under the FDCPA. The Court will review the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Henson et al. v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., to dismiss the FDCPA class action that had been filed against Santander, and will look at the Plaintiffs’ request to determine whether a financing company that regularly attempts to collect delinquent debts is, in fact, a “debt collector” that is subject to the FDCPA.
According to its website, Santander is a “full-service, technology-driven, consumer finance company focused on vehicle finance and unsecured consumer lending products. Headquartered in Dallas, the company has more than two million customers across all credit grades.
Santander has allegedly engaged in collection agency tactics--for example, making harassing phone calls--to collect consumer debts. The company also advertises itself as a direct lender. On its website is the following:
"It may be possible to refinance your auto loan to save money with RoadLoans, Santander Consumer USA’s direct-lending product. You could pay off your existing auto note and replace it with a more affordable loan and monthly payment. Qualified customers can even choose a cash-back option or may even be able to skip a car payment."
Santander's subprime auto-loan business has recently come under state and federal regulatory scrutiny. Many consumers have complained about potentially discriminatory lending practices and the granting of loans with high interest rates to borrowers who may not be able to repay them, as occurred in the run-up to last decade’s housing crisis.
Santander has made many of its customers very angry. For instance, LawyersandSettlements has posted complaints against the lender and collection agency such as the following:
"I entered an auto loan agreement in Feb of 2014 for a 13,000 car. I have made monthly payments of 345.00 that has now reached about 12,000. I called for a payoff amount and was given 14,000... NONE of my payments have been applied toward the principal amount."
"I would like to join this lawsuit. I was constantly harassed by Drive Financial and when Santander took over I wasn't notify by the company of the change and was constantly harassed by the company If I was even a day late. I took out a loan on a 2007 Kia Spectra and my payoff was extended by lots of unexplained fees."
"I bought a 2010 Dodge Caliber in 2012 and Santander picked up my loan with a 24% interest rate. At the time I was aware of the affects of that interest rate. The total of the car was 13,999, I traded in a vehicle which they gave me $3,000 for . I have already paid $11,000 for the car and still owe $9,842 for payoff of this vehicle that is now worth $2,000."
The TCPA regulates the use of auto/predictive dialers, which are used to initiate pre-recorded voice messages, faxes and SMS text messages. Here is more about the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and restrictions of phone use. Debt collectors may violate federal law if they engage in any of the following practices:
Several Telemarketing lawsuits have been filed against the company over the past several years. A lawsuit filed in federal court in the Western District of Wisconsin holds that the federal statute may apply to calls even if an auto/predictive dialer is not used to initiate them. In Nelson v. Santander Consumer USA, Heather Nelson accuses Santander Consumer USA of calling her cellular phone more than 1000 times over the course of a year in an attempt to collect a debt on two vehicles she had financed. In May 2010, Santander repossessed one of those vehicles. In response, Nelson filed the lawsuit, arguing that Santander’s actions violated her rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Wisconsin Consumer Act, and Wisconsin common law.
In February 2015 Santander Consumer USA Inc. agreed to pay about $9.35 million to resolve a lawsuit by the Department of Justice alleging that the motor vehicle lender violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA). The settlement covers the improper repossessions of 1,112 motor vehicles between January 2008 and February 2013. The proposed consent order represents the largest settlement for illegal automobile repossessions ever obtained by the United States under the SCRA.
In September 2014 Santander was sued by investors over subprime lending practices. Investors filed a lawsuit claiming the lender misled them about the company’s “auto lending business and underwriting practices."
Last updated on
FREE SANTANDER TCPA VIOLATIONS LAWSUIT EVALUATION
Send your Santander TCPA Violations claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
Santander Car Title Loans
"It may be possible to refinance your auto loan to save money with RoadLoans, Santander Consumer USA’s direct-lending product. You could pay off your existing auto note and replace it with a more affordable loan and monthly payment. Qualified customers can even choose a cash-back option or may even be able to skip a car payment."
Santander's subprime auto-loan business has recently come under state and federal regulatory scrutiny. Many consumers have complained about potentially discriminatory lending practices and the granting of loans with high interest rates to borrowers who may not be able to repay them, as occurred in the run-up to last decade’s housing crisis.
Santander has made many of its customers very angry. For instance, LawyersandSettlements has posted complaints against the lender and collection agency such as the following:
"I entered an auto loan agreement in Feb of 2014 for a 13,000 car. I have made monthly payments of 345.00 that has now reached about 12,000. I called for a payoff amount and was given 14,000... NONE of my payments have been applied toward the principal amount."
"I would like to join this lawsuit. I was constantly harassed by Drive Financial and when Santander took over I wasn't notify by the company of the change and was constantly harassed by the company If I was even a day late. I took out a loan on a 2007 Kia Spectra and my payoff was extended by lots of unexplained fees."
"I bought a 2010 Dodge Caliber in 2012 and Santander picked up my loan with a 24% interest rate. At the time I was aware of the affects of that interest rate. The total of the car was 13,999, I traded in a vehicle which they gave me $3,000 for . I have already paid $11,000 for the car and still owe $9,842 for payoff of this vehicle that is now worth $2,000."
Santander TCPA Lawsuit
- Communicate with your friends, relatives, co-workers, or individuals other than yourself on multiple occasions.
- Disclose to others that you owe a debt.
- Communicate with you at odd times or places without your consent.
- Make repeated phone calls to you with the intention of harassing you or communicate with you in a harassing or abusive manner.
- Communicate with you in a false or misleading manner.
- Call a cellular phone using an automatic dialing machine or a recorded message without express authorization.
Several Telemarketing lawsuits have been filed against the company over the past several years. A lawsuit filed in federal court in the Western District of Wisconsin holds that the federal statute may apply to calls even if an auto/predictive dialer is not used to initiate them. In Nelson v. Santander Consumer USA, Heather Nelson accuses Santander Consumer USA of calling her cellular phone more than 1000 times over the course of a year in an attempt to collect a debt on two vehicles she had financed. In May 2010, Santander repossessed one of those vehicles. In response, Nelson filed the lawsuit, arguing that Santander’s actions violated her rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Wisconsin Consumer Act, and Wisconsin common law.
Other Santander Lawsuits
In September 2014 Santander was sued by investors over subprime lending practices. Investors filed a lawsuit claiming the lender misled them about the company’s “auto lending business and underwriting practices."
TCPA Santander Legal Help
If you believe you have been subjected to abusive or illegal actions by Santander, or any collection agency or bank that has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act or the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, you may want to seek legal help.Last updated on
READ MORE Telemarketing and Robocall Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Consumer Banking Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Media/Telecom Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Consumer Banking Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Media/Telecom Settlements and Legal News
READER COMMENTS
Dwayne D Collins
on
Seriously, we need to find a law firm to start another class action lawsuit, they are conducting the same unethical business practices that they just recently paid millions to settle
Eddie Bledsoe
on
I owe one more year on a 2015 vehicle with interest rates about 23% and they have never wanted to refinance for a lower rate.
larry benfield
on
Robert Beaston
on
kevin berhorst
on
Stephen Baker
on
Tanya Harris
on
Shirley Davis
on
sonya mccullough
on
Fabienne Milord
on
Catrina Knight
on
Carla Little
on
Jessica Russell
on
Beth
on
Will Randall
on
Doris L Keene
on
James Eley
on
Steve churilla
on
Shannon R
on
Eureka Hawkins
on
Elaine Young
on
Sherry Sauve
on
Aimee M Jewell
on
Santander has tacked on ridiculous late fees and now has charged off my account. I want to be a part of this lawsuit
Betty Hayes
on
Ginger Rider
on
Jamie Combs
on
Katrina Evans
on
Atiya w
on
Connie Shannon
on
Carla Little
on
Mari O.
on
LEAH P
on
We have always been marked late because their system delays payments made on the loan.
I make a payment and the payment never shows until 2 months later.
I made one payment at the bank , well my Husband insisted he do it instead of the online method I have used for the 5 years. That payment was never applied . I lost a months payment despite having evidence of payment.
Bank says they applied it and loan department says otherwise.
As far as other people on here. You do understand that all loans basically pay interest first then apply principle. The first 2 -3 years you pay interest with Santander then they get you for the amount you actually paid for the car at the tail end of loan. By that time of course your car is no longer worth what the loan is for , it's worth way less than your loan when you drive off the lot. That is why people should have GAP insurance on the policy. Gap insurance pays the entire loan balance instead of the book value of the car . Never finance a car without it. Of course when you buy a 10G car and it has 8G in interest for the loan you are paying the 18G for the car. Your car gets wrecked the day after you get it , you will be lucky if insurance pays you 10G , the 8G is still on you. Yes you paid 10 G for the car and the insurance pays them 10G , your loan is for 18G still , that's why it's a must for Gap insurance, so insurance pays 10G and the 8G , the gap between what your car is worth and the actual loan amount is covered. . I'm amazed at the amount of people who don't know what gap insurance is . I think dealers should be mandated to inform people of it esp when dealing with Santander.
Pamela Schutzman
on
Jerica Moore
on
Ciara D
on
Calvin Butler
on
Susan Curnutt Hughes
on
Brandon Keating
on
Susan H.
on
It's been almost 5 years and they have applied $8,886 toward the principal. This is an outrageous rip-off and there should be
a class action lawsuit against them as so many others have the same complaints.
Anastasia
on
Ashley R Hensley
on
Anna Ellia
on
Vanessa Neuerburg
on
George D Davis
on
Rache L.
on
Patience
on
Harold zanders
on
Tungelin Beene
on
Kimberly
on
Nancy Burdick
on
Rocky Stice
on
LISA MITCHELL
on
Tami Wenzl
on
Rachel
on
Kim
on
Monica Beavers
on
Yolanda Teasley
on
Ian Sabey
on
Jennifer Gray
on
Does anyone know how I can find out the names of all the dealerships Santander is suing? I'm one of the unfortunate dealerships that they have created irreparable harm to and after I've deposited a substantial amount of money thru a mediation process, they've decided after months of back and forth that they no longer wish to honor what they themselves gave as an offer. It's my understanding that they have over 100 dealerships they are suing so I not only wish to get the names to create a class but also to expose these cases in the media.
Thanks
Jenn
Yvonne Houston
on
Thank you.
Cliff Cunningham
on
It has not went down a dime am I paying 300 a month in interest the car was not on good condition to start and the auto center I got the car from were big scanners now I have a car that I put work into and paying monthly this is unfair need help
Thank you
Cliff Cunningham
Shelby fost
on
alice
on
Shirley Guyton
on
April
on
jodie sanchez
on
Marcus McKinney
on
Kimberly Davis
on
Martha Lancaster
on
Reshika Shivers
on
Lisa
on
How do I join this lawsuit
Maria
on
DeAnna G
on
Darnel
on
I really don't know where to start on this, but its dragging my credit down.